Everyone Read This Before I Go On A Rampage. You Can't Fight This Within A Wrongful Foreclosure Case. There Is No Case. We Are Contending Their Case Was Void And Never Existed. You Have Already Won It. We Just Prove The Court Had No Jurisdiction

You Have No Burden To Prove Fraud.  The Definition of Fraud Should Tip You Off To The Fact That You Don't Need To Prove Fraud.  Fraud Means That Someone Is Lying To You And Hiding Something From You.

                                                                                                       Brilliant Quote By Danny Hammond

Comment From A Subscriber from Our YouTube Channel - @mtgfrd

The judge deprived me of the right to present my statute and regulatory findings. She immediately became angry and called me rude and if l keep talking l would be held in contempt and she would have the baliff arrest me throw me in jail. This is a nonjudicial foreclosure. This state is judicial.

It was fraud.

@mtgfrd

17 minutes ago

Reply by Danny

I don't even know where to start. You need to pause  everything you are thinking. You don't want to want to fight fraud with statute or regulatory findings (whatever you think that means). No one can help you win a fraud case in your foreclosure fraud case. There is no fraud, because there is no case. None of that will help you.

The case is void. In law void means that it wasn't here yesterday. It won't be here today. It will not be here again tomorrow.

The only way anyone (Plaintiff, Foreclosing Party, Ghost Company particularly U.S. Bank Trust National Association) can bring their Complaint into any court and try to prosecute their case is by claiming -

1.) that they have suffered an Injury, and that they are providing "Concrete and Particularized" Evidence to prove that their injury is real or factual. An "Injury In Fact".

2.) They must continue and with that same burden of evidence they must be able to demonstrate that they can "Fairly Trace" the causation of their Injury to the Actions of the Defendant/Borrower, which is YOU.

And 3.) They must prove to the court that if the court rules in their favor, that will redress their Injury. (Make it all better.)

I have said this 100 times. I have worded it 1,000 ways. I have told you that you have no burden to prove fraud.

They must have Standing. That is the base of all Constitutional Law. Those things above that are numbered 1.) 2.) and 3.) are what the Foreclosing must say and prove.

You must Answer, "Huh, Uh."  I have never been in default with any of these jokers in this case. You already have a sort of Standing only stronger. You have the deed to the property. That is absolute.

You must forget all of the cartoon characters and Off-Broadway stage actors who are trying to get the judge to hand your home to a "Stranger to the Contract".

I no longer will take on a client that cannot get this through their heads.

It is not my strategy. It is the prescribed remedy that the framers put into the Constitutional Doctrine of "Cases and Controversies." 

Without the Foreclosing Party  proving that it, they, them, he, she has a genuine dispute with you then there can be no Standing. Without Standing there can be no Subject Matter Jurisdiction. The judge has no case to hear. Touchdown!!

At the beginning of your comment you said everything that you could possibly say to lose.

Losing hurts. I like winning better.

But, this all has been done the wrong way for so long, that it is a slippery slope to do it the easy way. Using the constitution.

Fraud means someone is lying to you and hiding information. And you choose to fight that? The law does not ask that of you. The Foreclosing party has to prove that they are not committing fraud.

SHEESH!!!