Pay now

From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: BORROWERS AS PRO SE WIN BIG FORECLOSURE FRAUD LAWSUIT AND GET THE HOUSE PLUS $2.5 MILLION DAMAGES

THE FORECLOSURE SOLUTIONS GROUP CLIENT BORROWERS IN COURT, AS PRO-SE, WIN BIG  FORECLOSURE FRAUD LAWSUIT AND GET THEIR HOUSE  PLUS  $2.5 MILLION DAMAGES 

"Turn this thing around, 

 I will not go quietly, 

 I will not lie down, 

 I will not go quietly"

                           Don Henley

This Article is being reprinted and was first posted April 9th, 2015.  I thought my clients would never lose again.  But, it was a slight change from what we are doing now and it couldn't be reproduced.

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

Pro Se means:  I am representing myself in court

MISSOURI STATE JUDGE MARCO A. ROLDAN made this ruling and you can read his very clear explanation on the link just below.

Click Here

Circuses Face Serious Labor Shortages As More Clowns Continue To Stream Into D.C.

 

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

In Other News:

I Used To Have A List Of All Of The Bad Guys I Have Dealt With In Support Of My Foreclosure Clients. I Did Not Find The Full List Yet. But, I Am Posting What I Did Find Here Today. I Don't Know Why.

 "What If The Hanky Panky,

   Is What It's All About?"

Have you had a run-in with any of the names of this list?  Then your foreclosure was fraudulent and is VOID.  This is not a guess on my part.  During this tear through different courts in different states with my pro se clients over the last 6 months, I was surprised how many of these either still exist or their names are being used by "Successor Imposters"  

LIST OF SHAME  ( This is, I think, a complete list of just the companies that I have dealt with and keywords I have used in 14 years of doing whatever it is that I do.

subject matter jurisdiction,Article III,Article III of the United States of America,Standing under FRCP Rule 12 (b)(1)  in wrongful foreclosure,Injury in Fact requirement for standing to foreclose,challenge standing,injury in fact,wrongful eviction,self-help eviction,stop eviction,challenge standing, challenge subject matter jurisdiction, foreclosure attorneys, saving my family's home, affordable fraud defenses, pro se, learn what pro se means, fighting foreclosure, consultants,stopping foreclosure, I can represent myself against my lender,save my house,save my home,help me save my home;can't find a foreclosure fraud attorney.

Ocwen, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Fannie Mae, Federal National Mortgage Association, Green Tree, Nationstar, LITTON LOAN SERVICING, RESIDENTIAL CREDIT, RESCAP LIQUIDATION TRUST,  COUNTRYWIDE  HOME LOANS, ARGENT MORTGAGE Corporation,  AMERIQUEST,  AMERICA'S WHOLESALE LENDERS FREEMONT MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION, FREEMONT INVESTMENT LOANS, CITIMORTGAGE, HSBC MORTGAGE CORP, TAYLOR BEANE & WHITAKER MORTGAGE CORP, FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC, GINNIE MAE, WACHOVIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, ADVANCE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, JP MORGAN CHASE, CHASE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, INDY MAC BANK FSB, AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE, PEOPLES BANK, SUNTRUST BANK, FINANCE AMERICA, LLC, INTERBAY FUNDING, LLC, PULASKI BANK, UNITED FIDELITY FUNDING CORPORATION, WORLD SAVINGS BANK, WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., GMAC MORTGAGE LLC,    DHI MORTGAGE COMPANY LTD,   CARRINGTON MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST,  Carrington Mortgage,  FRANKLIN BANK SSB, BANK OF AMERICA, NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE, MORTGAGE ONE CORP, MORTGAGE LENDER'S NETWORK USA, INC. AEGIS FUNDING CORP, WILMINGTON FINANCE,a division of AIG Federal Savings Bank, Caliber Mortgage, US BANK N.A., RESCAP GMAC MORTGAGE LLC FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY FRAUD, Deutsche Bank, Deutsch Bank National Trust Company as Trustee, Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, US Bank N.A. as Trustee, Bank of New York as Trustee, Deutsche Bank, Deutsch Bank National Trust Company as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, US Bank N.A. as Trustee,  Bank of New York "BONY" as Trustee, OCWEN, NATIONSTAR, GREEN TREE, SETERUS, EverBank, A Bunch of REMIC TRUSTS, DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, LITTON LOAN SERVICING (OR OTHER SIMILAR NAMES), COUNTRYWIDE  HOME LOANS  (and many similar names now owned by Bank of America and known as BAC,

READ MORE by going through our YouTube Channel

LET'S ALL JUST TAKE THREE STEPS BACK FROM CRAZY! THAT IS RULE #1-- WHEN FIGHTING MORTGAGE FRAUD: Carpenter v Longan 1872; [Also On YouTube Channel] @mtgfrd

 Heirs of a cold war,  that's what we've become, Inheriting troubles,  I'm mentally numb

Crazy,..... I just cannot bear,  That I'm living with something that just isn't fair, 

Mental wounds not healing.....Who and what's to blame

I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train,  I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train

                                                                                                                      Ozzy Osborne

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE:  "ASSIGNMENT OF YOUR MORTGAGE",

EVEN THOUGH IT HAS BEEN USED ILLEGALLY 30 MILLION TIMES IN 22 YEARS

The Supreme Court settled the matter of assigning a mortgage or deed of trust in 1872. You can't assign those instruments.  The case is CARPENTER V LONGAN AND THE CASE IS IN THIS ARTICLE JUST BELOW. 

Find out why any assignment of the security agreement is void.  Keep reading.

Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

I have reviewed hundreds, possibly thousands of home loan paperwork preceding a fraudulent foreclosure.   I have read about many more.  I have never seen any deal where the foreclosing party was not relying on an assignment of the security instrument.  

IN THE 26 STATES THAT USE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE THE  MORTGAGE IS CALLED A DEED OF TRUST.  THE WORD MORTGAGE IS RARELY SPOKEN IN THESE STATES.

In Judicial foreclosure states, the assignment of the security instrument involves what is called a mortgage.  A mortgage is not a home loan.  It is merely the rule book concerning the collateral you put up to ensure that the bank will be paid back.  

A mortgage has no value and the assignment of a mortgage does NOT transfer your home loan from one party to another.  In the Non-Judicial States, the security instrument is called a Deed of Trust which serves the same purpose as a mortgage.  There is no such thing as "the assignment of a mortgage or a deed of trust.  The mortgage or deed of trust exists only as part of the loan agreement and it is incidental.  The security instrument is known as the incidental instrument (there are no laws that require collateral for a loan at all.)  

Your house is the usual collateral involving a home loan because that is where the loan money was spent.  But, collateral could also consist of one thousand Schwinn bicycles in a warehouse.  It is my strong personal belief that all (ALL) of the foreclosures in the United States from about the year 2000, or earlier, are based on the exact (EXACT) same lie.  What is that lie?

CARPENTER V LONGAN (SUPREME COURT 1872)  THE ENTIRE RULING IS NEXT

CONTINUE READING    

mtgfrd.info@gmail.com   For questions or comments

US Bank, Its Trust Department, Or Its Meddling Henchmen Have Been Showing Up In 75% Of All Of Our Foreclosure Cases In The Last Few Years. Are They A Criminal Operation?

 Yes, They Are a Criminal Organization.

 "Venal and evil men are destroying the world you were born in. It's us against them, my good friend. Don't compromise your principle  or abandon your cause." 

                                                                                             

                                                                                                 Major General John Bell Hood CSA

US Bank's own Trust Department Brochure is a bombshell revelation.  It says that a Corporate Trustee has no authority or ability to participate in any Real Estate Foreclosures

In the battle to defend your home from wrongful foreclosure, homeowners often find themselves up against big names like U.S. Bank, Deutsche Bank, or Bank of New York Mellon. These “trustees” appear on foreclosure documents, often leading homeowners to believe these institutions are actively managing their loans and directly pulling the strings in the foreclosure process. But here’s the truth: *They’re not*.

We have been using a US Bank Trust Department marketing brochure for years that makes their role as a loan trustee or a mortgage-backed security trustee (the word trustee has many meaning in foreclosures. This confuses Borrowers and it is intentional.  But, the marketing brochure put out by the US Bank Trust Department makes what "CAN'T HAPPEN" crystal clear. It’s like hearing from the horse’s mouth that the supposed power these trustees hold over your mortgage is largely a facade. This document exposes a shocking reality that many homeowners – and even their attorneys – don’t fully understand. Let’s break it down.

In U.S. Bank’s own words, as a trustee for Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS), they perform a narrow set of duties:

READ MORE

I Have Good News - And That Will Bring On Some Changes In How I Think We Can Win

 

When I was younger, so much younger than today, I never needed anybody's help in any way. 

But now these days are gone, I'm not so self-assured, 

Now I find, I've changed my mind, and opened up the doors.

                                                                                The Beatles

I have been doing this for 14 years.  I have never met another borrower who had lost more than I have.  Not just money, I have lost the most I have heard about and worked with, but I have lost so much family, friends and my own youth.

Last June, I realized I had gotten old fighting something so big that it made no sense to think it was winnable.

But, maybe it is.  I have just done something so remarkable, that I haven't said much to anyone.

By 2012, I knew what we had to do and I knew why it would work.  But, I couldn't solve the end.  Napolean's "Ta Dum."

I have taken 6 straight Borrower's to a win.  That is not anything I ever even thought about.  It seems really odd to say it now.  It wasn't dramatic.  They all happened just as they should.  It changes everything.

I had not done anything with any Borrowers for 3 years.  I was absolutely exhausted.

Then recently, it hit me that I knew what to do and I was just holding back because I thought that if it was just another almost right idea, I might go crazy.  I have had a YouTube Channel for more than ten years.  It never did anything and this website outperformed it many, many times over.  

But, I was ready to change the last piece of the puzzle and I was looking for where it would work best.  I made four quick videos and placed them on my YouTube Channel with 18 older ones.  YouTube had changed.  It works.  I got the 6 clients in one week and they all looked like they would work.  131 days later they all were quiet wins.  No marching bands, no confetti in the streets,  No huge balloon characters held down by 20 people with ropes.  It went just like all of us thought it should.

It could still be some unearthly quirk.  Luck.  Dumb luck.  I don't think so, though.  It was just so logical.

I am going after my properties now.  I am rejuvenated.  Not hysterically so.  Just ready.

None of the six have been able to pay me even what little I asked for.  I am not upset about that.  They just wanted so badly to not lose their home.  I am upset that so many of us have fought it so long that no one can afford what this can be done for today.  It is going to be much less expensive than what so many of us have spent.

I have always wanted to put a big group together and use it to raise money so everyone has a chance.  None of my early ideas worked.  I have always thought it was going to take a monstrous journalist or movie star to shine a spotlight on the problem.

I have adapted there now, also.  I know how to do it.

I want to use YouTubes new ideas and add Patreon and Telegram and raise the money with the 30 million Americans who lost their homes.  I am starting today.  I am wrapping up the last of the six and I took on one other that could not pay, but there were some great things I could learn from it.  I'll let all of you know if I am right.  Intellectually I am sure.  

But, emotionally I am waiting for the other shoe to drop.  I don't feel it yet.  But, in ways it is better to know it than feel it.

If you would like to have us evaluate your situation please fill out this form:

Click for Form Here

The Term "Void" Is Often Used In Contrast To "Voidable" And "Unenforceable". The Main Difference Is That An Action That Is Voidable Remains Valid Until It Is Avoided.

“I was playing for time. Just for time. I played the wrong way, of course.”

Raymond Chandler

"Here cum da Judge"

   by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press.

  

Surely no one can truly believe that it is the Borrowers that come up with these bizarre scenarios? 

My sister uh, Mary, is an attorney, who is probably the smartest person I have ever known, was home this weekend and I asked about maybe we should be objecting to the new judge in this case who has oddly not committed a crime yet, and he was going to take over to provide cover for the original judge who had committed all of the crimes by removing the case to Federal Court.  That is like stealing 3rd base from 1st base.  No one would do that.  The Constitution is perfectly clear.  Not on stealing 3rd, but removing a VOID case to Federal court.  You can't do that.  

Although, if he says one more sentence, we are gonna pounce hard on him and make him the defendant, not as a judge but as himself, and make it stick.  

Mary came up with a Motion For Reconsideration, which startled me because I had actually begun to believe that was a term I made up, because I never had a judge comment on it, even though I tried it over 7 and a half billion times while helping Borrowers understand courts and such.

I told her that I just didn't see how you could remove VOID.  It is unthinkable.  Void cannot be arranged.  It is nothingness.  It never was.  It can never even be.

She kind of agreed.  But, neither of us could explain that notion in "earth terms". 

(You see, most attorneys don't ever deal with law all that much.  Except sewer court rat attorneys like ambulance chasers and Borrower representation in foreclosure).  Once again, I must speak up.

Read More

If you would like to have us evaluate your situation please fill out this form: Click for Form Here

If You Believe In Borrowers Getting A Modification To Protect Them From Foreclosure, I Have A Unicorn In My Basement I Might Be Willing To Sell

They're leaving you nothing and nowhere to go

Just put you in the corner like an old banjo
The strings are breakin' but you can't say no
You're runnin' with the devil and it's touch and go

                                               Emerson Lake and Powel (Running with the Devil)

by Danny Hammond
of the 3/4 Court Press

I am getting an increasing number of pleas for me to help people who think they are in the middle of a Modification of their loan. I thought we were done with that in 2012. Modifications usually start with a 3 month "trial" to see if you can now pay on time. 

Everyone that calls me passed this part according to the rules given to them. Pay 3 month on time. Then the wickedness sets in. All sorts of "reasons" begin to be received by the Borrower regarding why their trial failed.  

Most are absurd.  They are relating experiences like telling the Borrower he did not pass the 3 months of payments, when he did.

Or the Borrower did not respond in the right amount of time. 

Or the Borrower used the wrong means of notification to the (usually the Servicer), whatever that means at that moment.   Or the Borrower used the wrong form, and the particularly nasty, your Servicer has changed and you must start over.  

My client right now who we are about to file into state court, was told every one of these things above.  She is stilled scared to death it is going to be a problem in the Lawsuit or Petition as a lawsuit is called in Missouri.  Read More

If you would like a free evaluation of your situation click here

From The Comments That I Am Getting, I Think I Am Concentrating Too Much On What Is True, But Not Explaining What is False. So, Here Goes

 

And the men who hold high places,  Must be the ones to Start, To mold a new reality, Closer to the Heart.

The Blacksmith and the Artist, Reflect it in their art, and Forge their creativity, Closer to the Heart.

Philosophers and Ploughmen, Each must know his part & Sow a new Mentality, Closer to the Heart.

You can be the Captain and I will draw the Chart, Sailing into destiny, Closer to the Heart.

Closer to the Heart. 

                                                                                                                                Rock Band "Rush"

I am getting an increasing number of pleas for me to help people who think they are in the middle of a Modification of their loan.  I thought we were done with that in 2012.

Modifications usually start with a 3 month "trial" to see if you can now pay on time.  Everyone that calls me passed this part according to the rules given to them.  Pay 3 month on time.

Then the wickedness sets in.  All sorts of "reasons" begin to be received by the Borrower regarding why their trial failed.  Most are absurd.  The Borrower did not respond in the right amount of time.  The Borrower used the wrong means of notification to the (usually the Servicer), whatever that means at that moment.

So, I will try to explain how and why a modification of your loan was supposed to be done when you got behind and just wanted to do the right thing to catch up.

Read More

The U.S. Department Of Treasury is tasked with the oversight of the HOME AFFORDABLE MODIFICATION ACT (HAMP) It was a very good law as written, but the Treasury left it up to the Lender or Servicer to administrate it.

Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP)

The largest program within MHA is the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). HAMP’s goal

is to offer homeowners who are at risk of foreclosure reduced monthly mortgage payments that are 

affordable and sustainable over the long-term.

HAMP was designed to help families who are struggling to remain in their homes and show:

• Documented financial hardship.
• An ability to make their monthly mortgage payments after a modification.

HAMP is a voluntary program that supports servicers’ efforts to modify mortgages, while

protecting taxpayers’ interests. To protect taxpayers, MHA housing initiatives have pay‐for‐

success incentives. This means that funds are spent only when transactions are completed

and only as long as those contracts remain in place. Therefore, funds will be disbursed over

many years.

Starting in the summer of 2012, the scope of the program will expand to help even more

families in need.

Continue Reading

HAMP works by encouraging participating mortgage servicers to modify mortgages so

struggling homeowners can have lower monthly payments and avoid foreclosure. It has

specific eligibility requirements for homeowners and includes strict guidelines for servicers.

The program includes incentives for homeowners, servicers, and investors to encourage

successful mortgage modifications.

Families in this program typically reduce their monthly payments by a median of more than 

$530 each month. But the program’s impact goes even further. HAMP has also encouraged

private lenders to modify mortgages at no expense to taxpayers.

When the housing crisis began, the mortgage industry was ill-equipped to respond adequately.

Mortgage servicers had insufficient resources to address the needs of a market that was

reeling from increasing foreclosures. In addition, their servicing expertise and infrastructure

was limited to overseeing collections and foreclosing on those who failed to pay. They did not 

have the systems, staffing, operational capacity, or incentives to engage with homeowners on 

a large scale and offer meaningful relief from unaffordable mortgages.

Before HAMP, there was no standard approach among loan servicers or investors about how

to help homeowners who wanted to keep making payments, but needed mortgage assistance.

By setting standards for what constitutes a sustainable modification across the mortgage 

industry, HAMP has helped to make private loan modifications more affordable for

homeowners. 

In fact, thanks in part to HAMP, the proportion of private loan modifications 

that reduce monthly payments for homeowners has more than doubled. Together, public and

private efforts have helped nearly 5 million Americans get mortgage assistance to prevent

avoidable foreclosures.

MHA includes comprehensive compliance reviews to ensure that servicers fairly evaluate

homeowners for assistance and follow program guidelines. Treasury requires participating

servicers to take specific actions to improve their servicing processes to more effectively assist 

struggling homeowners. While more progress needs to be made, servicers are focusing

attention on the areas identified through regular compliance and program reviews.

Note: If you are a homeowner seeking help with your mortgage, please visit Making Home

Affordable.

U.S. Department of the Treasury

• About Treasury
 
• Policy Issues
 
• Data
 
• Services
 
• News
• Search

Breadcrumb

1. Home 
 
2. Data 
 
3. Troubled Asset Relief Program 
 
4. Housing 
 
5. Making Home Affordable (MHA) 
 
6. Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) 

• • Housing
    • Overview
    • Program Documents
    • Hardest Hit Fund (HHF)
    • Making Home Affordable (MHA)
      • Extensions and Enhancements to MHA
      • Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP)
      • Program Research
      • Contracts
    • Beware of Foreclosure Scams
  • Investment in American International Group (AIG)
  • TARP Reports
• Digital Government Strategy Milestones

Accounting Of The Foreclosure Sale Proceeds, Credit Bid and; Deficiencey Or Surplus Due To The Borrower

“Court business is a hell of a problem. It’s a good deal like politics. It asks for the highest type of men and women, and there’s nothing in it to attract the highest type of men and women. So we have to work with what we get...”
                                     Paraphrasing of ― Raymond Chandler, The Lady in the Lake

WATCH THIS VIDEO IT IS IMPORTANT

@mtgfrd  On YouTube Search

or search for - "Danny Hammond foreclosure" You will find it.

If you would like to have us evaluate your situation free please fill out this form:

Click for Form Here

What If Your Wrongful Foreclosure Was Already Void, But You Were Unaware Of This Fact?

If you don't stick to your values when they're being tested, they're not values: they're hobbies.

               Jon Stewart

Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 court press

04-21-2022

I have just read a very long email from a borrower who was trying to tell me how he had proven over and over that the foreclosing party which does not exist, did not have the right to foreclose. He has been in court for years and suffered nearly unimaginable suffering and pain and costs.

But, I can imagine. I can remember. Trying to figure out the courts.

It shouldn't be that hard, should it? The courts seem crazy. But, what if Chuck's court is only incompetent? What if this judge is just a no-talent judge guy.

This judge won't learn anything because the other judge guys will protect him from the Borrower. He will protect his other judge guys also, so.....they won't learn anything either. That's how judges go. They are Knuckleheads. They all used to be attorney guys.

I know this is true. After years of working it out, I know that the majority of judges in these mortgage fraud cases are hopelessly devoid of knowledge of, or experience with, real estate chains of title or real estate law, or finance.

When I reply to him I know what I will say. It has been going around in my head like a song for a year. It will go something like this: CONTINUE READING

The Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements of Article III Standing As Defined By the The United States Supreme Court- From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: Foreclosure Fraud Primer 101 #4

“All power is originally vested in, and consequently derived from, the people.”

                                                                                        The United States Constitution

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press  

The judge promised when he took the job that he, or she, would enforce and protect the laws that come from the constitution and that they would defend the public perception of the court ferociously in order to keep from losing the public trust in the integrity of the court.

Maybe that was too much to ask from some pompous asses. Why did we all expect more of judges and attorneys anyway? If I am any part of the public, then I can tell you for sure, the courts have already lost some of MY public trust.

It is difficult for me to pull Borrowers back from their searches for Promissory Notes, and the Assignments of Mortgage, MERS, PSA, etc., etc., thinking like Dick Tracy and Perry Mason, as well as Captain Kirk looking for a way to "prove" that the party trying to foreclose on them does not have the RIGHT or, STANDING, to do so.

CONTINUE READING

Would you like a free review of your loan and foreclosure documents?

mtgfrd.info@gmail.com