Everyone Read This Before I Go On A Rampage. You Can't Fight This Within A Wrongful Foreclosure Case. There Is No Case. We Are Contending Their Case Was Void And Never Existed. You Have Already Won It. We Just Prove The Court Had No Jurisdiction

You Have No Burden To Prove Fraud.  The Definition of Fraud Should Tip You Off To The Fact That You Don't Need To Prove Fraud.  Fraud Means That Someone Is Lying To You And Hiding Something From You.

                                                                                                       Brilliant Quote By Danny Hammond

Comment From A Subscriber from Our YouTube Channel - @mtgfrd

The judge deprived me of the right to present my statute and regulatory findings. She immediately became angry and called me rude and if l keep talking l would be held in contempt and she would have the baliff arrest me throw me in jail. This is a nonjudicial foreclosure. This state is judicial. It was fraud.

@mtgfrd

17 minutes ago

Reply by Danny

I don't even know where to start. You need to pause  everything you are thinking. You don't want to want to fight fraud with statute or regulatory findings (whatever you think that means). No one can help you win a fraud case in your foreclosure fraud case. There is no fraud, because there is no case. None of that will help you.

The case is void. In law void means that it wasn't here yesterday. It won't be here today. It will not be here again tomorrow.

The only way anyone (Plaintiff, Foreclosing Party, Ghost Company particularly U.S. Bank Trust National Association) can bring their Complaint into any court and try to prosecute their case is by claiming -

1.) that they have suffered an Injury, and that they are providing "Concrete and Particularized" Evidence to prove that their injury is real or factual. An "Injury In Fact".

2.) They must continue and with that same burden of evidence they must be able to demonstrate that they can "Fairly Trace" the causation of their Injury to the Actions of the Defendant/Borrower, which is YOU.

And 3.) They must prove to the court that if the court rules in their favor, that will redress their Injury. (Make it all better.)

I have said this 100 times. I have worded it 1,000 ways. I have told you that you have no burden to prove fraud.

They must have Standing. That is the base of all Constitutional Law. Those things above that are numbered 1.) 2.) and 3.) are what the Foreclosing must say and prove.

You must Answer, "Huh, Uh."  I have never been in default with any of these jokers in this case. You already have a sort of Standing only stronger. You have the deed to the property. That is absolute.

You must forget all of the cartoon characters and Off-Broadway stage actors who are trying to get the judge to hand your home to a "Stranger to the Contract".

I no longer will take on a client that cannot get this through their heads.

It is not my strategy. It is the prescribed remedy that the framers put into the Constitutional Doctrine of "Cases and Controversies." 

Without the Foreclosing Party  proving that it, they, them, he, she has a genuine dispute with you then there can be no Standing. Without Standing there can be no Subject Matter Jurisdiction. The judge has no case to hear. Touchdown!!

At the beginning of your comment you said everything that you could possibly say to lose.

Losing hurts. I like winning better.

But, this all has been done the wrong way for so long, that it is a slippery slope to do it the easy way. Using the constitution.

Fraud means someone is lying to you and hiding information. And you choose to fight that? The law does not ask that of you. The Foreclosing party has to prove that they are not committing fraud.

SHEESH!!!

If Your Finances Have Been Hit Hard By Your Fight Against Foreclosure, Here's a Less Expensive Program : 2 1/2 Hours Of Real Time Working Together Phone Sessions To Create Your Complaint Fast

Foreclosure Solutions Group-  Q&A Session Thursday

6 PM Thursday July 30th The Meet Code Will Be Here By This Evening.

Meet Code: _________________________________________________

Click on the blue form below to help you decide if this is for you.

Danny Hammond Phone Sessions With Myself And The Client Working With Google Shared Files Allowing Us To Write and Edit A Document To File Together,  showed very good results 

YouTube Channel   @mtgfrd  

The Foreclosure Solutions Group Wants you to know, that we now have two "Working Programs regarding Working Together With The Client In Real Time."  To create together the documents required to show the Foreclosing Party You Are Getting Smarter At An Exponential Rate and you are ready for the fight.  We can start and finish the needed documents Much, Much Faster and with the Borrower retaining more of the information learned and needed than anything I have ever put together before.  This plan can let you budget how you want to go from this point to the end.

We have Plan A - $950 

To get you from start to finish.  As long as we agree we can only win by not quitting.

We have Plan B - $350 You will work with me to get your first filing in.  This way you will get 1st Hand experience at what I can do to help you.  If you wish to continue, you can make the last two payments of $300 at the beginning of the last stages, if necessary at those stages.  There is a good chance that we win the home in the 2nd stage making the last payment unnecessary.

Plan C is new and I may have to use it to make it even possible for me to afford to do it.

Plan C: Phase I -  $700 To Get Your First Filings In

             Phase II - $700 -To Respond And Answer their swarms of Motions To Dismiss etc.  We can win                                         at this phase making the 3rd phase uneccessary.

              Phase III -$700  To take you as far as we can go.  I expect a win before this.  But, I will be                                                 prepared to stay with it until we know we have done all we can. 

For whatever reason you need to start less expensively but still moving you forward rather than just sitting and worrying.  Whether you just want to see proof yourself before you spend nearly $1,000 or you can just need a less expensive beginning because your money situation is getting worse.   You can begin taking care of a significant time problem with the Foreclosing Party and the court breathing down your neck.

See what you think below.  

mtgfrd.info@blvdre.com  Leave Questions and Comments for Danny Hammond

That means from filing your Complaint immediately and Working With You In Real Time.  The Goal Is To Get To A Final Judgment Quickly.  

That Includes:

Answering All Motions, from the Foreclosing Party. 

The Borrower Can Challenge The Assignments Of The Security Instruments [mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed etc.] Pursuant To The Rulings In "Slorp": The Full Case is Included Here

"WHAT IF THE HANKY PANKY IS WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT?"

RICK A. SLORP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LERNER, SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; SHELLIE HILL; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

ALL OF THE FORECLOSING PARTIES HAVE BEEN USING THE WORN OUT INTERPRETATION  OF LAW,  SAYING "THE BORROWERS CANNOT CHALLENGE ANY ASSIGNMENTS OF THE MORTGAGE".   BUT, MORTGAGE FRAUD CHANGES ALL OF THAT ACCORDING TO THE SIXTH CIRCUIT APPEALS COURT IN "SLORP"!

   Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

   The Foreclosure Solutions Group

   

The Imposter Foreclosing Party almost always claims that the Borrower (as the mortgagor) cannot challenge assignments. You did make your Promissory Note negotiable according to the terms of your Promissory Note that you allegedly signed. That is why the foreclosing parties use this interpretation.

But did the foreclosing party buy it legally? No almost assuredly it was never involved in a purchase and sale transaction which even involved any real purchase of your debt.

                                                                                                             READ MORE Click this link 

Learn the Hanky Panky with Danny Hammond - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

What If Your Wrongful Foreclosure Was Already Void, But You Were Unaware Of This Fact?

There Is A Good Chance That Is True.

If you don't stick to your values when they're being tested, they're not values: they're hobbies.

               Jon Stewart

Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 court press

04-21-2022

Find Danny Hammond mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

I have just read a very long email from a borrower who was trying to tell me how he had proven over and over that the foreclosing party which does not exist, did not have the right to foreclose. He has been in court for years and suffered nearly unimaginable suffering and pain and costs.

But, I can imagine. I can remember trying to figure out the courts.

It shouldn't be that hard, should it? The courts seem crazy. But, what if Chuck's court is only incompetent? What if this judge is just a no-talent judge guy.

This judge won't learn anything because the other judge guys will protect him from the Borrower. He will protect his other judge guys also, so.....they won't learn anything either. That's how judges go. They are Knuckleheads. They all used to be attorney guys.

I know this is true. After years of working it out, I know that the majority of judges in these mortgage fraud cases are hopelessly devoid of knowledge of, or experience with, real estate chains of title or real estate law, or finance.

When I reply to him I know what I will say. It has been going around in my head like a song for a year. It will go something like this: CONTINUE READING

Find Danny Hammond - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

Get Answers Or Sign Up For The New Working Together to Protect Your Home In Foreclosure

A Letter From One Who Was Uniquely Qualified To Point Out The Chronic and Permanent Deficiencies In Setting Up The Constitutional Judiciary

In The Constitution, It is stated that it is the citizens who must defend the 

Constitution from defects or intentional changes when it is absolutely 

imperative.

Below is a letter considering whether the founders had made a grave error in establishing the parity of the 3 branches of government.  It is a fundamental problem today.

It is singularly responsible for the foreclosure crisis today.

The different Supreme Courts over decades and centuries have slowly created laws (which only Congress can do) covering the total ass of every judge by giving all judges (including their asses) Absolute Immunity. 

No matter what intentional or unintentional unlawful every judge has Absolute Immunity from being sued by the Parties in court case. Again. Absolute Immunity if your house is taken in a crime in which a judge was a co-conspirator.  

My strategy will still work, but it may be harder.  My problem with this is that the Constitution is clear that no citizen can be raised higher than any other citizen.  This is especially covered the 5th,11th, and 14th Amendments to the Constitution.  These Common Law abominations are just made up by multiple Supreme Courts.  They are inventions of convenience and not real laws.  They  didn't try to amend the constitution.  They just buried all of the self-invented self interest changes in common law backwater.

They made law.  They made every judge, not matter what he has done, untouchable and irresponsible for any act or crime they commit.  They can't do that, so those changes they made to protect their asses, but not ours, are unconstitutional.

There is no change in any of the words of those Amendments in the Constitution.  They changed constitutional law and buried these laws they made up which could only done following:

Only a majority vote in both houses in Congress and a vote of yes, by the citizens of 2/3 of the all of the states can amend the constitution.  There were ten amendments added immediately which make up the original Bill of Civil Rights.  This process makes changing the constitution so difficult that in 250 years there have been only 17 amendments since the enactment of the United States Constitution.

Today's King Robert's Supreme Court is the worst offender of all of the Supreme Court's over the entire 250 years of the Citizens created Judiciary.

Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

The Letter From a United States Citizen Complaining About The Lack of Any Oversite of Judges Starts Below:

"With us all the branches of the government are elective by the people themselves, except 

the Judiciary, of whose science and qualifications they are not competent judges." 

Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous;
that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and
irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only,
pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become 

law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and 

working its change by construction, before anyone has been busily employed in consuming its substance.

In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account.

             

Thomas Jefferson: letter to Monsieur A. Coray, Oct 31, 1823

From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: DIRTY DEEDS DONE DIRT CHEAP: All You Need To Know About That Servicer & Successor Trustee You Say is After You

 FORECLOSURE FRAUD DEPENDS ON JUST A FEW PLAYERS TO BE SUCCESSFUL.

BUT THEY MUST BE CRIMINAL PLAYERS

THE MOST IMPORTANT IS THE 

SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE AND HE/SHE/IT IS/ARE THE ONLY ONE YOU REALLY CAN SUE

THE SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE PERFORMED AN ILLEGAL ACT IN THE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE

A FORECLOSURE DEED WAS CREATED {FORGERY} THEN IT WAS RECORDED {WIRE FRAUD} 

"Pick up the phone, I'm here alone, or you could make a social call

I'm always home.  Call me at any time. 

Just ring 362-436-####
I lead a life of crime!

Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!
Dirty Deeds and their done dirt cheap!  AC DC

This article is dedicated to the six foreclosure mill law firms that were "appointed" to be Substitute Trustees" by fictitious Lenders to fraudulently foreclose on 14,400 families in Jackson County Missouri alone.  For each year, for the last five years.  Creating displaced refugee families at numbers rivaling anywhere in the world.  

          
Jackson County is just one medium-sized county in the United States.

If you want me to name these firms in this blog and tell what I know about each one, then fill out the form below (you don't have to put your name or contact info) just let me know that you are pissed off.)  

I hate the idea that I'm the only person in the world who is pissed off.  That would mean I have a problem with reality.  

 

BUT REMEMBER, THE FACT THAT YOU ARE PARANOID,

DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE POSSIBILITY THAT, 

SOMEONE IS OUT TO GET YOU

QUESTION:  HOW MANY SOCIOPATHIC RACKETEER ENTERPRISE PARTIES DOES IT TAKE TO STEAL YOUR HOUSE?

ANSWER:  ALL OF THEM

And I have just had it.  I am right.  You can't work on one subject for eight years, 7 days a week and not understand the material.  I am likely no genius, but I have often been told that I am very smart. Very smart?  I don't know about that, but I am right.

CONTINUE READING    

Danny Hammond Has Never Serviced Or Trusted Anyone - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

Tenney's Win In The Judicial Foreclosure Kansas Appellate Court Case This was Danny Hammond's 1st Complete and Correct Win

 “I was playing for time. Just for time. I played the wrong way, of course.”

Raymond Chandler

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

Case No. 110.359

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Trustee for THE Certificateholders of CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST INC., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007- AMC1, Appellee, 

v. 

DENNIS W. TENNEY and BECKY TENNEY, et aI., Appellants the appellate court stated:

“Per Curiam: “Dennis and Becky Tenney filed a motion to set aside an agreed
judgment of mortgage foreclosure, claiming that the judgment was void. They argued that
U.S. Bank had not shown that it properly held the note secured by the mortgage therefore it was not the real party in interest, and it therefore lacked standing to sue. 

The district court denied the motion, finding that it was untimely. We disagree, because in Kansas lack of standing is jurisdictional and can be raised at any time, and Kansas Law is in lock step with Article III. 

We reverse and remand for a hearing on the question of whether the agreed judgment was void for U.S. Bank's lack of standing.

The district [Kansas state] court heard that motion the same day it was filed. The judge declined to take evidence, but it did hear arguments of counsel. 

The greatest part of the hearing consisted of a colloquy between the district court and the Tenneys' new attorney. Counsel advised the district court that the Tenneys were claiming the judgment was void under Article III and Kansas UCC statute, stating: "I think the judgment is void if they're [U.S. Bank] not the proper party in interest." 

The Tenneys' attorney maintained that the issue of whether a judgment was void for lack of standing could be raised at any time. The district court disagreed.

Continue Reading      The First Face To Face and Correct Win For Me.

Find Danny Hammond - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

LET'S ALL JUST TAKE THREE STEPS BACK FROM CRAZY! THAT IS RULE #1-- WHEN FIGHTING MORTGAGE FRAUD: Carpenter v Longan 1872; [Also On YouTube Channel] @mtgfrd

 

Heirs of a cold war,  that's what we've become, Inheriting troubles,  I'm mentally numb

Crazy,..... I just cannot bear,  That I'm living with something that just isn't fair, 

Mental wounds not healing.....Who and what's to blame

I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train,  I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train

                                                                                                                      Ozzy Osborne

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE:  "ASSIGNMENT OF YOUR MORTGAGE",

EVEN THOUGH IT HAS BEEN USED ILLEGALLY 30 MILLION TIMES IN 22 YEARS

The Supreme Court settled the matter of assigning a mortgage or deed of trust in 1872. You can't assign those instruments.  The case is CARPENTER V LONGAN AND THE CASE IS IN THIS ARTICLE JUST BELOW. 

Find out why any assignment of the security agreement is void.  Keep reading.

Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

I have reviewed hundreds, possibly thousands of home loan paperwork preceding a fraudulent foreclosure.   I have read about many more.  I have never seen any deal where the foreclosing party was not relying on an assignment of the security instrument.  

IN THE 26 STATES THAT USE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE THE  MORTGAGE IS CALLED A DEED OF TRUST.  THE WORD MORTGAGE IS RARELY SPOKEN IN THESE STATES.

In Judicial foreclosure states, the assignment of the security instrument involves what is called a mortgage.  A mortgage is not a home loan.  It is merely the rule book concerning the collateral you put up to ensure that the bank will be paid back.  

A mortgage has no value and the assignment of a mortgage does NOT transfer your home loan from one party to another.  In the Non-Judicial States, the security instrument is called a Deed of Trust which serves the same purpose as a mortgage.  There is no such thing as "the assignment of a mortgage or a deed of trust.  The mortgage or deed of trust exists only as part of the loan agreement and it is incidental.  The security instrument is known as the incidental instrument (there are no laws that require collateral for a loan at all.)  

Your house is the usual collateral involving a home loan because that is where the loan money was spent.  But, collateral could also consist of one thousand Schwinn bicycles in a warehouse.  It is my strong personal belief that all (ALL) of the foreclosures in the United States from about the year 2000, or earlier, are based on the exact (EXACT) same lie.  What is that lie?

CARPENTER V LONGAN (SUPREME COURT 1872)  THE ENTIRE RULING IS NEXT

CONTINUE READING    

For questions, comments or clowning around with Danny Hammond - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

Circuses Face Serious Labor Shortages As More Clowns Continue To Stream Into D.C.

 

For questions, comments or clowning around with Danny Hammond - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

                                                   by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

In Other News:

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press