No Matter How Hard It Is To Suspend Your Disbelief, You Gotta Try. MERS Is Not Your Valid Concern. They Are An Invention With No Purpose Except To Distract You. Read The Deposition of The MERS Creators

 

It ain't what you don't know that get's you into trouble, it's what you know for sure that just ain't so!"         -Mark Twain

Deposition of J.K. Arnold President and CEO Incorporated Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., and MERSCORP Inc. (and some other MERS names)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT 2 FOR 3 MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

4

5 DEBRA A. HENDERSON,

6 Plaintiff,

7 vs. 

                                                                      CIVIL ACTION NO.  CV-08-900805.00

8

MERSCORP, INC., et al.,

9

Defendants.

10

11 * * * * * * * * * * * * *

12

13 VIDEO DEPOSITION OF R.K. ARNOLD,

14 taken pursuant to stipulation and agreement before

15 Tracye Sadler Blackwell, Certified Court Reporter

16 and Commissioner for the State of Alabama at Large,

17 in the Offices of The American Association for

18 Justice, 777 6th Street, NW, Suite 200, Washington,

19 D.C., on September 25, 2009, commencing at

20 approximately 10:10 a.m.

21

22 * * * * * * * * * * * * *

23

2

1 APPEARANCES 2 3 ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF: 4 Mr. Nicholas H. Wooten

WOOTEN LAW FIRM

5 Attorneys at Law

P.O. Drawer 3389

6 Auburn, Alabama 36831 7 Mr. Lynn W. Jinks, III

JINKS, CROW & DICKSON

8 Attorneys at Law

219 North Prairie Street

9 P.O. Box 350

Union Springs, Alabama 36089

10

11 ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANTS:

12 Mr. Robert M. Brochin

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP

13 Counselors at Law

200 South Biscayne Boulevard

14 Suite 5300

Miami, Florida 33131

-2339

15

Mr. Shaun Ramey

16 SIROTE & PERMUTT

Attorneys at Law

17 2311 Highland Avenue

Birmingham, Alabama 35205

18

Ms. Sharon McGann Horstkamp

19 MERS

Vice President & General Counsel

20 1818 Library Street

Suite 300

21 Reston, Virginia 20190

-5619

22

ALSO PRESENT:

23 Mr. Fred Walker, Videographer

3

1 EXAMINATION INDEX

2

BY MR. WOOTEN . . . . . . . . . . . 8

3

4 EXHIBIT INDEX

5

To Find Out If MERS Is A Real Conern In Your Case, Read Further And Learn For Yourself.  But, Sit Down This Is Very Long.  But, It Eliminates MERS.  If You READ Far Enough

Continue Reading click here

Do You Want To Know Why Mers is not a threat to you? Here Are 2 Depositions By MERS Top Organizing Officers. They Say MERS Never Owned Any Loans.

 

The Deposition of William C Hultman The Original Chief Financial of MERS

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY 

Deposition of William C Hultman CFO of MERS & other AKAs

 

CHANCERY DIVISION - ATLANTIC COUNTY  
DOCKET NO. F-10209-08 
 BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR 
 THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWABS, 
 INC. ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, 
 SERIES 2005-AB3 
 Plaintiff(s),

 
 vs. 

 VICTOR and ENOABASI UKPE 
 Defendant(s). 
___________________________________________ 
 VICTOR and ENOABASI UKPE 
 Counterclaimants and 
 Third Party Plaintiffs,

 
 vs.

 
 BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR 
 THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWABS, 
 INC. ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, 
 SERIES 2005-AB3 

 Defendants on the Counterclaim, 
 and 

 AMERICA'S WHOLESALE LENDER; 
 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.; 
 MORGAN FUNDING CORPORATION, 
 ROBERT CHILDERS; COUNTRYWIDE 
 HOME LOANS SERVICING LP, 
 PHELAN, HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, 
 P.C., 

 Third Party Defendants 
 -------------------- 
 April 7, 2010 
Deposition of William Hultman
DEGNAN & BATEMAN 
(856) 232-7400 

Page 2 

1 Oral sworn video/telephone conference deposition of WILLIAM HULTMAN, taken in the law office

2 of Morgan, Lewis, Bockius, 502 Carnegie Center, Princeton, New Jersey, before Michelle M. Downes, a

3 Certified Court Reporter and Notary Public of the State of New Jersey, commencing at 10:55 a.m. on the

4 above date, there being present: 

5 LAW OFFICES OF JAMES F. VILLERE, JR.  BY: JAMES F. VILLERE, JR., ESQUIRE 

6 MARK J. MALONE, ESQUIRE 
 Attorneys for Ukpes as Defendants and 

7 Third Party Plaintiffs 

8 SOUTH JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES 
 

BY: ABIGAIL SULLIVAN, ESQUIRE 

9 Attorneys for Ukpes as Defendants and  Third Party Plaintiffs 

10 Via video conference in Washington DC: 

11 GOODWIN PROCTER, LLP  BY: SABRINA M. ROSE-SMITH, ESQUIRE 

12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Bank of New York  as Trustee for the Certificate Holders

 
13 CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates,  Series 2005-AB3 and Countrywide as Third 14 Party Defendants

 
15 MORGAN, LEWIS, BOCKIUS, LLP   BY: ROBERT M. BROCHIN, ESQUIRE 16 Attorneys for MERS 

17 Via telephone:

 
18 WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER 

19 BY: DANIEL S. BERNHEIM, ESQUIRE 

20 Attorneys for Third Party Defendant 21 

22 Also present: 

23 Judy Romano, Esquire (via telephone) 24 John Murphy, Esquire (via video) 

25 Daniel E. Orr, Esquire

CONTINUE READING IF YOU REALLY WANT TO FIGURE OUT MERS. IT IS A LITTLE LONG

EMAILS AND OTHER INFORMATION AND CONTACTS FOR THE FORECLOSURE SOLUTIONS GROUP ON YOUTUBE AND HERE ON BLOGGER

 Emails: 

For Free Review Of Your Foreclosure Click Here  Fill Out This Form

Phone Visits With Danny  Click https://secure.blueoctane.net/forms/2MFCRF9OCARC

Foreclosure Solutions Workshops Info: https://secure.blueoctane.net/forms/FOVQXJZ529TJ

Sign To Get Emails regarding News & Events : https://secure.blueoctane.net/forms/9D18TWH6VB08  

I Am Astonished That Nearly Everyone Knows That What I Say About The Constitution Is Right. Then They Go Back To Obsessing About Their Fight With A Servicer that never collected money Wthin The Case We Are Contending Doesn't Exist

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." "Since when do you have to agree with people to defend them from injustice?" "If it were not for injustice, man would not know justice." "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."   

                                                                                                               Mark Twain

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

A very good way to show the "too complicated" I have been talking about.  Is the dreadful lack of wins in court when the Borrower is trying to use statute and law against mostly nonexistent or organized racketeer entities pushing their limited, wrong, and mostly "made up" strategies that cannot possibly win without the interference and facilitating of a judge.

I see a lot of wrong rulings now, that seem to be reasoned out, unless you read very carefully.  

In the beginning of the Wall Street Meltdown my judges just didn't recognize that I had even filed anything.  Then ruled Denied or Granted without explanation.  The law gave them 30 days to answer my motions or other filings.  I mean to tell you, they never acknowledged anything I wrote.

All laws and statute both state and Federal are still where they were before.  They have not been stolen or destroyed.  Most were written a long time ago.  For me a long time ago means everything written before 1999.  Things made sense before then. 

Our laws are for the most part simple and logical.  The authors of the Constitution, Federal Law, and state law would never know of the internet.  They never dreamed of air travel. None of them ever got to ride in a car or even travel about on paved roads.  They were not as distracted as we are, so they had the time and the schooling to make simple logical law.

There has always been and there will always be a percentage of people who are corrupt, greedy, and have no interest in doing the right thing. 

But nothing in history can come close to the hell we are living with today.  I blame the internet, the very technology I am typing this "article" on.

After 2004-2008  there is little research that you can do that will be effective in saving your home.  This is because the laws that should work, don't.  "Is a law, a law, if it is not enforced. 

When your government along with the judiciary cannot be trusted, researching for the legal answers and protections you are looking for is pretty easy to describe and scope.  

If a court (judge) has been promised cash, gold and a boat, and he must "rule" against you to get those things, he is going to rule against you.  

The laws are still on shelves, in libraries and even on the internet.  They are untouched.  It is easy for you to have the expectation that you can use them in your wrongful foreclosure case and that they will help you prove fraud against everyone involved.

But, if you hang around losing and making "notes to self" long enough, you will figure out which laws won't work and narrow down your choices of which laws will work. 

The Burden Of Proof:  Since 2010 everyone I have talked to has been trying to prove to a court that they have been, or still are, being defrauded.  I started out the same way.  We were not attorneys who worked in the same court every day with all the same judges and having relationships with those judges for years.  

The framers of the constitution knew much more about human nature than we do.  They could see the future.  They did not see this coming.  That the judiciary would rule against law if they were offered enough incentive.   

But they did guess that things would go wrong.   They left room for changes that they didn't try to imagine.  They gave us methods and remedies to correct changes for the worse.  

For instance, the constitution states in one sentence that everyone had civil rights that could never be violated.  (Thus, the often stated heresay that "judges have some leeway" is inaccurate. Because, no, they don't.)

They had some rough spots in the very beginning of the Judiciary.  These brilliant men had not written down or thought through those civil rights.  The first Supreme Court (called "The Court") had its first melt down before the ink dried on the Constitutional Signatures.

It seems many people decided that they should avail themselves of those civil rights in court.  The court had to go to Congress with a very logical question about the ensuing logjam. You have said that we have rights, but the people are asking us if their civil rights in various ways have been violated.  So, Mr. Congress just "What are our civil rights when addressed by a court?"  (Three Stooges slap to the head)

READ More Here: Don't Believe That ALL of What You Need Know Was In The Beginning.  Read it all.

LIVE FREE Question & Answer SESSION WITH DANNY HAMMOND TODAY A SUNDAY (04/11/2026) 6 PM CENTRAL TIME (WHERE KC AND CHICAGO SIT)

LIVE FREE Question  & Answer SESSION WITH DANNY HAMMOND _____________, (______/2026) ___PM CENTRAL TIME (WHERE KC AND CHICAGO SIT)

CODE:  https://meet.google.com

Contact Us:  mtgfrd@gmail.com

To send us what you have regarding a foreclosure for a free review   Fill Out And Submit Form Here

Details: The Foreclosure Solutions Group Create Your Complaint       Foreclosure Solutions Workshops  

Danny Hammond PHONE VISITS 2 1/2 hr TOTAL TIME                          Phone Visits Information

Sign Up For Emails For YouTube & Website; News; Events                   Sign Up For Email Notifications  

                                                                                         

The New and Revised What's The Problem Bugging Danny Hammond? Is It Solved Yet? YES, We Have A New & Better Plan With A Lower Cost!!

"I've got to keep in some sort of touch with all the loose ends of this dizzy affair if I'm ever gonna make heads or tails of it."

                                                       Sam Spade

How Do These Foreclosure Mills Keep Getting Those Incredible  Hands?

By Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

03-06-2026  I have begun to think that our pricing structure to help Borrowers in Wrongful Foreclosure situations needs to be changed.

I have a new way of demonstrating to Borrowers, a simpler faster way to get to the filing of a lawsuit which is better also.

This is our original pricing which we used until today.

Phase I - Working with Borrowers to create their Complaint and get it filed.

                $750

Phase II - Immediately after filing the Complaint, the characters in their case will file Motions.  A parade of Motions.  Most likely Motion to Dismiss the Case of the Borrowers just filed.  They Borrower won't know how to Answer.  So they will need us again.  That could be a long process.  But, in actuality they and I know more about their case and the Motions won't come as fast.  But, I would suggest that they sign up for Phase II.

               $500    

Total Cost  -  $1,250

New Pricing for the Foreclosure Solutions Group Workshop.

03-08-2026    Phase I & Phase II  Correct the strategy that they have been using and involve them in the change, so that when we file they will understand their own lawsuit (Complaint).  This is the most difficult phase.  We have to go through all of their paperwork and any past legal attempts.  They must help put it together.  They have the information, they just don't know what it all is yet. They will help with writing it.  But, with myself using what I have recently learned.

Total Cost For Phase I & 2 to be paid upfront = $950   

If paid upfront and if I do have a better plan, I may be able to attain my goal of hiring a small but capable staff.

$1,250 - $950 = $300 SAVINGS

SAVINGS THAT WILL HELP YOU WITH MORE LONGER   

Savings on a better program. We can hire staff sooner and help more Borrowers nearly immediately.  

LET'S TRY TO SOLVE ANOTHER ISSUE:  You want to talk to Danny Hammond before signing up for the workshop

If your funds are tight and thinking about sending money to a "talking head" on the internet creeps you out.  If you need to ask questions and get answers before you pay a larger amount of money.

Then you should get to do that.  But, I am worried about time, money, and existing Complaints I am working on.

I know many of you want to talk to me first.  I haven't been able to arrange that because time is my issue.  But, I should try to figure out something.

This has to work for me to.  But, we can both decide something instead of wondering.

Phone Visits With Danny Hammond:  $300

Schedule 2.5 hours of phone visits:

Send Your Paperwork and Turn In the Detailed  Form So I Can Review It. I don't want to take up your or my time with trying to get me up to date.  It will waste less of your paid time if you send what you have first for me to review before the call.

Discuss and Review Your Particular Situation With Danny Hammond.

One 30 minute Phone Visit with Danny Hammond for us both to get oriented.

Schedule either 2 phone one hour visits or one 2 hour visit to discuss the actual issues and the plans with explanations and the results and goals that we can work for.

and

If you are comfortable, you can sign up for the Workshop knowing what the goals are.  Or you can decide that it isn't for you, but you do have more knowledge to help you know what to do.  You will still have the advice and you can decide more confidently how to approach your problem.

Click Here to Sign Up For Danny Hammond Phone Visits

What If Your Wrongful Foreclosure Was Already Void, But You Were Unaware Of This Fact?

There Is A Good Chance That Is True.

If you don't stick to your values when they're being tested, they're not values: they're hobbies.

               Jon Stewart

Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 court press

04-21-2022

I have just read a very long email from a borrower who was trying to tell me how he had proven over and over that the foreclosing party which does not exist, did not have the right to foreclose. He has been in court for years and suffered nearly unimaginable suffering and pain and costs.

But, I can imagine. I can remember. Trying to figure out the courts.

It shouldn't be that hard, should it? The courts seem crazy. But, what if Chuck's court is only incompetent? What if this judge is just a no-talent judge guy.

This judge won't learn anything because the other judge guys will protect him from the Borrower. He will protect his other judge guys also, so.....they won't learn anything either. That's how judges go. They are Knuckleheads. They all used to be attorney guys.

I know this is true. After years of working it out, I know that the majority of judges in these mortgage fraud cases are hopelessly devoid of knowledge of, or experience with, real estate chains of title or real estate law, or finance.

When I reply to him I know what I will say. It has been going around in my head like a song for a year. It will go something like this: CONTINUE READING

The Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements of Article III Standing As Defined By the The United States Supreme Court- From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: Foreclosure Fraud Primer 101 #4

“All power is originally vested in, and consequently derived from, the people.”

                                                                                        The United States Constitution

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press  

The judge promised when he took the job that he, or she, would enforce and protect the laws that come from the constitution and that they would defend the public perception of the court ferociously in order to keep from losing the public trust in the integrity of the court.

Maybe that was too much to ask from some pompous asses. Why did we all expect more of judges and attorneys anyway? If I am any part of the public, then I can tell you for sure, the courts have already lost some of MY public trust.

It is difficult for me to pull Borrowers back from their searches for Promissory Notes, and the Assignments of Mortgage, MERS, PSA, etc., etc., thinking like Dick Tracy and Perry Mason, as well as Captain Kirk looking for a way to "prove" that the party trying to foreclose on them does not have the RIGHT or, STANDING, to do so.

CONTINUE READING

Would you like a free review of your loan and foreclosure documents?

mtgfrd.workshops@gmail.com

The Borrower Can Challenge The Assignments Of The Security Instruments [mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed etc.] Pursuant To The Rulings In "Slorp": The Full Case is Included Here

"WHAT IF THE HANKY PANKY IS WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT?"

RICK A. SLORP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LERNER, SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; SHELLIE HILL; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

ALL OF THE FORECLOSING PARTIES HAVE BEEN USING THE WORN OUT INTERPRETATION  OF LAW,  SAYING "THE BORROWERS CANNOT CHALLENGE ANY ASSIGNMENTS OF THE MORTGAGE".   BUT, MORTGAGE FRAUD CHANGES ALL OF THAT ACCORDING TO THE SIXTH CIRCUIT APPEALS COURT IN "SLORP"!

   Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

   The Foreclosure Solutions Group

   mtgfrd.workshops@gmail.com

The Imposter Foreclosing Party almost always claims that the Borrower (as the mortgagor) cannot challenge assignments. You did make your Promissory Note negotiable according to the terms of your Promissory Note that you allegedly signed. That is why the foreclosing parties use this interpretation.

But did the foreclosing party buy it legally? No almost assuredly it was never involved in a purchase and sale transaction which even involved any real purchase of your debt.

                                                                                                             READ MORE Click this link 

Would you like a free review of your loan and foreclosure documents?

I Used To Have A List Of All Of The Bad Guys I Have Dealt With In Support Of My Foreclosure Clients. I Did Not Find The Full List Yet. But, I Am Posting What I Did Find Here Today. I Don't Know Why.

 "What If The Hanky Panky,
   Is What It's All About?"

Have you had a run-in with any of the names of this list?  Then your foreclosure was fraudulent and is VOID.  This is not a guess on my part.  During this tear through different courts in different states with my pro se clients over the last 6 months, I was surprised how many of these either still exist or their names are being used by "Successor Imposters"  

LIST OF SHAME  ( This is, I think, a complete list of just the companies that I have dealt with and keywords I have used in 14 years of doing whatever it is that I do.

First in italics are some of the keywords Borrowers found me with.  I have been around so long that my name Danny Hammond is one of the most common used.  I think that is kind of funny in a dark and sinister way.  What other lists must I be on.  

subject matter jurisdiction,Danny Hammond,Article III,Article III of the United States of America,Standing under FRCP Rule 12 (b)(1)  in wrongful foreclosure,Injury in Fact requirement for standing to foreclose,challenge standing,injury in fact,wrongful eviction,self-help eviction,stop eviction,challenge standing, challenge subject matter jurisdiction, foreclosure attorneys, saving my family's home, affordable fraud defenses, pro se, learn what pro se means, fighting foreclosure, consultants,stopping foreclosure, I can represent myself against my lender,save my house,save my home,help me save my home;can't find a foreclosure fraud attorney.

New Rez, LLC dba ShellPoint Servicing registered fictitions name,Ocwen, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Fannie Mae, Federal National Mortgage Association, Green Tree, Nationstar, LITTON LOAN SERVICING, RESIDENTIAL CREDIT, RESCAP LIQUIDATION TRUST,  COUNTRYWIDE  HOME LOANS, ARGENT MORTGAGE Corporation,  AMERIQUEST,  AMERICA'S WHOLESALE LENDERS FREEMONT MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION, FREEMONT INVESTMENT LOANS, CITIMORTGAGE, HSBC MORTGAGE CORP, TAYLOR BEANE & WHITAKER MORTGAGE CORP, FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC, GINNIE MAE, WACHOVIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, ADVANCE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, JP MORGAN CHASE, CHASE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, INDY MAC BANK FSB, AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE, PEOPLES BANK, SUNTRUST BANK, FINANCE AMERICA, LLC, INTERBAY FUNDING, LLC, PULASKI BANK, UNITED FIDELITY FUNDING CORPORATION, WORLD SAVINGS BANK, WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., GMAC MORTGAGE LLC,    DHI MORTGAGE COMPANY LTD,   CARRINGTON MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST,  Carrington Mortgage,  FRANKLIN BANK SSB, BANK OF AMERICA, NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE, MORTGAGE ONE CORP, MORTGAGE LENDER'S NETWORK USA, INC. AEGIS FUNDING CORP, WILMINGTON FINANCE,a division of AIG Federal Savings Bank, Caliber Mortgage, US BANK N.A., RESCAP GMAC MORTGAGE LLC FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY FRAUD, Deutsche Bank, Deutsch Bank National Trust Company as Trustee, Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, US Bank N.A. as Trustee, Bank of New York as Trustee, Deutsche Bank, Deutsch Bank National Trust Company as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, US Bank N.A. as Trustee,  Bank of New York "BONY" as Trustee, OCWEN, NATIONSTAR, GREEN TREE, SETERUS, EverBank, A Bunch of REMIC TRUSTS, DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, LITTON LOAN SERVICING (OR OTHER SIMILAR NAMES), COUNTRYWIDE  HOME LOANS  (and many similar names now owned by Bank of America and known as BAC,

READ MORE by going through our YouTube Channel

MORTGAGE FRAUD: It Is A Straight Line! Your Entire Fraudulent Foreclosure Case Is Based On A Straight Line With No Gaps. But In Today's Corrupted System There Are Always Unexplainable Gaps.

"I have complete faith in the continued absurdity of whatever's going on."

                                                                                                  John Stewart 

                           

Republished by Danny Hammond

I have read, and I still read, many messages from Borrowers

who are looking for help against mortgage fraud and wrongful foreclosure involving their homes.  Lately, I have run into

several Facebook Groups that exist for their members to collaborate and share their own searches on the internet and strategies that they have heard about or read about.  There are some issues with this that are causing them to  get overwhelmed and stuck.  

I know a lot about this.  Not because I am so smart, but because I am familiar with being overwhelmed and stuck.

It was easier for me to overcome because I learned about the Chain of Title of records recorded against the property that houses sit on starting at 12 years old with my Dad.  Most people never really deal with it more than once or twice in their lives.

Everything in life has a straight line.  A beginning and the middle and the end.  They never change positions.  In real estate, the straight line is usually more obvious than say a drive across the country.

CONTINUE READING                 

Would you like a free review of your loan and foreclosure documents?

A Question From The Comments Section of Our YouTube Channel: "Is It True, That State Laws Allow A Foreclosure To Take Place Without The Foreclosing Party Producing The Note?"

 An escalator can never break, 

It can only become stairs.

You should never see an "Escalator Temporarily Out Of Order" sign,

Just "Escalator Temporarily Stairs" "Sorry for the convenience"

      
                                        Mitch Hedberg

 

By Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

First, I have an update.  A real update.  It is a good update and it concerns the workshops.

UPDATE ON THE WORKSHOPS: 

I have faced one obstacle after another in putting together the workshops.  This is taking too long and I know there are people that are running out of time.  

But, our luck has finally changed, I have found an amazing and talented person to build a staff from and to help me.  The difference is amazing.  I will be ready in the very near future to start accepting applicants.

Now, back to:

  

"Is it true that state laws allow a foreclosure to take place without the Foreclosing Party producing the Note?"

For 14 years I have continuously been asked if "your lender" can foreclose without the Promissory Note. This requires a 2 part Answer.

1. Yes, it is true that the original Promissory Note must be presented by anyone claiming to own the Note and is trying to collect money from you, including collecting money by Foreclosure, in both judicial and nonjudicial states.

But it is not a Promissory Note which is owned. The Promissory Note is the title to the debt you still owe, just like the title to a car or machinery.

The lender does not record the Promissory Note and neither does the Borrower in most cases.  That is because the law regarding this is in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). It says that you should fill out a UCC-1 form describing the transaction and then record both the UCC-1 form and the Promissory Note in the County Recorder's office which is the same place your other recorded documents are recorded and kept.

In fact, very few Borrowers even know they should do this. I knew better but I did not do this on the loans for my properties. 

The law is unforgiving. "I was very busy," is not in any law or statute, as far as I know.

So that should expose all of you to the fact that, despite some compliments paid to me occasionally, I am not a certifiable genius.  Only certifiable.

 

If we all had done this, much of the Wall Street Meltdown could not have happened.  So, you really need to remember this fact that the Promissory Note is the contract between you and a lender and it is the evidence of the existence of the debt, or remaining debt you owe. When signed It becomes  a fact that when you signed for your loan, you agreed you had received the money, and that you owed the money back. This agreement and its terms are what created the contract that is in the Promissory Note and signed by you and the "lender".

That makes your lender, whoever actually sent the money you borrowed to the closing of your loan, the original "person in interest" who owns your remaining debt. That is where you must divide your mind (which if it wasn't true before it probably is now) between the law that you keep asking me about, and Crime.  None of the above is what really happened.  It is only what should have happened and since it didn't there is no foreclosing party that can meet the Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements of Standing.

READ MORE: THIS ONE IS VERY IMPORTANT

ALSO, See my Article, Down a few Posts: Or click here: "Let's All Take 3 Steps Back From Crazy!"

From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: BORROWERS AS PRO SE WIN BIG FORECLOSURE FRAUD LAWSUIT AND GET THE HOUSE PLUS $2.5 MILLION DAMAGES

THE FORECLOSURE SOLUTIONS GROUP CLIENT BORROWERS IN COURT, AS PRO-SE, WIN BIG  FORECLOSURE FRAUD LAWSUIT AND GET THEIR HOUSE  PLUS  $2.5 MILLION DAMAGES 

"Turn this thing around, 

 I will not go quietly, 

 I will not lie down, 

 I will not go quietly"

                           Don Henley

This Article is being reprinted and was first posted April 9th, 2015.  I thought my clients would never lose again.  But, it was a slight change from what we are doing now and it couldn't be reproduced.

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

Pro Se means:  I am representing myself in court

MISSOURI STATE JUDGE MARCO A. ROLDAN made this ruling and you can read his very clear explanation on the link just below.

Click Here

Circuses Face Serious Labor Shortages As More Clowns Continue To Stream Into D.C.

 

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

In Other News:

LET'S ALL JUST TAKE THREE STEPS BACK FROM CRAZY! THAT IS RULE #1-- WHEN FIGHTING MORTGAGE FRAUD: Carpenter v Longan 1872; [Also On YouTube Channel] @mtgfrd

 Heirs of a cold war,  that's what we've become, Inheriting troubles,  I'm mentally numb

Crazy,..... I just cannot bear,  That I'm living with something that just isn't fair, 

Mental wounds not healing.....Who and what's to blame

I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train,  I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train

                                                                                                                      Ozzy Osborne

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE:  "ASSIGNMENT OF YOUR MORTGAGE",

EVEN THOUGH IT HAS BEEN USED ILLEGALLY 30 MILLION TIMES IN 22 YEARS

The Supreme Court settled the matter of assigning a mortgage or deed of trust in 1872. You can't assign those instruments.  The case is CARPENTER V LONGAN AND THE CASE IS IN THIS ARTICLE JUST BELOW. 

Find out why any assignment of the security agreement is void.  Keep reading.

Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

I have reviewed hundreds, possibly thousands of home loan paperwork preceding a fraudulent foreclosure.   I have read about many more.  I have never seen any deal where the foreclosing party was not relying on an assignment of the security instrument.  

IN THE 26 STATES THAT USE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE THE  MORTGAGE IS CALLED A DEED OF TRUST.  THE WORD MORTGAGE IS RARELY SPOKEN IN THESE STATES.

In Judicial foreclosure states, the assignment of the security instrument involves what is called a mortgage.  A mortgage is not a home loan.  It is merely the rule book concerning the collateral you put up to ensure that the bank will be paid back.  

A mortgage has no value and the assignment of a mortgage does NOT transfer your home loan from one party to another.  In the Non-Judicial States, the security instrument is called a Deed of Trust which serves the same purpose as a mortgage.  There is no such thing as "the assignment of a mortgage or a deed of trust.  The mortgage or deed of trust exists only as part of the loan agreement and it is incidental.  The security instrument is known as the incidental instrument (there are no laws that require collateral for a loan at all.)  

Your house is the usual collateral involving a home loan because that is where the loan money was spent.  But, collateral could also consist of one thousand Schwinn bicycles in a warehouse.  It is my strong personal belief that all (ALL) of the foreclosures in the United States from about the year 2000, or earlier, are based on the exact (EXACT) same lie.  What is that lie?

CARPENTER V LONGAN (SUPREME COURT 1872)  THE ENTIRE RULING IS NEXT

CONTINUE READING    

mtgfrd.workshops@gmail.com   For questions or comments