If Your Finances Have Been Hit Hard By Your Fight Against Foreclosure, Here's a Less Expensive Program That Could Help: 2 1/2 Hours Of Phone Sessions With Danny H.

LESS EXPENSIVE STRATEGY TO GET YOUR NEEDED COMPLAINTS AND MOTIONS INTO COURT MORE QUICKLY.  NO TEACHING.  YOU KNOW YOUR DETAILS, I KNOW WHAT TO DO.

WE JUST GET SET UP WITH GOOGLE DRIVE SHARE AND WE BOTH JUST START WORKING AT THE SAME TIME ON YOUR COMPLAINT.  YOU WILL LEARN MORE AND RETAIN MORE.  IT IS ALREADY WORKING.

WE ARE NOW DOING CREDIT CARD DEBT ALSO.  IT IS JUST THE SAME ONLY EASIER.

Find Danny Hammond more easily now -  We are using just one email.  

I am not smart enough to use 3 EMAILS.   This is the one - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

I can't sustain working only on foreclosures and now credit card collectors.  I have proven to myself I can't spend all of my time on foreclosures. I don't know how many clients I can even take on.  I am going to very strictly spend half of the my time on Home Construction and half my time on foreclosures.  Unless I get enough interest to afford a staff, I will just keep the number of foreclosure and Credit Card Collections low.  If you are interested I have just told you availability will be limited.

I had to find a way to spend less time per person or I will have to stop for awhile and work full time on my own real job of real estate development and home building.  I am unable to bring in enough money to stabilize my monthly costs. I have to change something or I think I will have to quit for at least a year.  My company has come to a stop.

I have been testing this system of working with Borrowers together and spending our time actually putting together their cases using Google Drive Share Folders and literally writing and editing Complaints while looking and writing and editing on the document together in real time.

It can work.  But, I have to budget my time.  I can make myself work on my career, getting my home back and getting my income back up and stable 50% of the time.  And scheduling 50% of my time on Foreclosure Solutions work.  I can just no longer spend all of my time on foreclosures.

This new deal has been working well.  I can work a much shorter period of time on each Borrower's case and working together we have come up with better results than myself alone.

I know what to do better than my Borrower, but they know what happened and when.  We do it right there together.  If we do all we can in a session and we need for one of us to do something before we can go further, we just stop the session and arrange a time we go again.

It is much less money up front.  I have finished everything to be ready to file a Complaint within the time the Borrower has purchased.  I have to do more before I can tell if it works long term for me and the Borrowers.  

IF YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE CONTINUE READING

FORM TO SIGN UP FOR THIS PROGRAM - Phone Sessions With Danny Hammond

Where is Danny?  mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

What If Your Wrongful Foreclosure Was Already Void, But You Were Unaware Of This Fact?

There Is A Good Chance That Is True.

If you don't stick to your values when they're being tested, they're not values: they're hobbies.

               Jon Stewart

Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 court press

04-21-2022

Find Danny Hammond mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

I have just read a very long email from a borrower who was trying to tell me how he had proven over and over that the foreclosing party which does not exist, did not have the right to foreclose. He has been in court for years and suffered nearly unimaginable suffering and pain and costs.

But, I can imagine. I can remember trying to figure out the courts.

It shouldn't be that hard, should it? The courts seem crazy. But, what if Chuck's court is only incompetent? What if this judge is just a no-talent judge guy.

This judge won't learn anything because the other judge guys will protect him from the Borrower. He will protect his other judge guys also, so.....they won't learn anything either. That's how judges go. They are Knuckleheads. They all used to be attorney guys.

I know this is true. After years of working it out, I know that the majority of judges in these mortgage fraud cases are hopelessly devoid of knowledge of, or experience with, real estate chains of title or real estate law, or finance.

When I reply to him I know what I will say. It has been going around in my head like a song for a year. It will go something like this: CONTINUE READING

Find Danny Hammond - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

Get Answers Or Sign Up For The New Working Together to Protect Your Home In Foreclosure

A Letter From One Who Was Uniquely Qualified To Point Out The Chronic and Permanent Deficiencies In Setting Up The Constitutional Judiciary

In The Constitution, It is stated that it is the citizens who must defend the 

Constitution from defects or intentional changes when it is absolutely 

imperative.

Below is a letter considering whether the founders had made a grave error in establishing the parity of the 3 branches of government.  It is a fundamental problem today.

It is singularly responsible for the foreclosure crisis today.

The different Supreme Courts over decades and centuries have slowly created laws (which only Congress can do) covering the total ass of every judge by giving all judges (including their asses) Absolute Immunity. 

No matter what intentional or unintentional unlawful every judge has Absolute Immunity from being sued by the Parties in court case. Again. Absolute Immunity if your house is taken in a crime in which a judge was a co-conspirator.  

My strategy will still work, but it may be harder.  My problem with this is that the Constitution is clear that no citizen can be raised higher than any other citizen.  This is especially covered the 5th,11th, and 14th Amendments to the Constitution.  These Common Law abominations are just made up by multiple Supreme Courts.  They are inventions of convenience and not real laws.  They  didn't try to amend the constitution.  They just buried all of the self-invented self interest changes in common law backwater.

They made law.  They made every judge, not matter what he has done, untouchable and irresponsible for any act or crime they commit.  They can't do that, so those changes they made to protect their asses, but not ours, are unconstitutional.

There is no change in any of the words of those Amendments in the Constitution.  They changed constitutional law and buried these laws they made up which could only done following:

Only a majority vote in both houses in Congress and a vote of yes, by the citizens of 2/3 of the all of the states can amend the constitution.  There were ten amendments added immediately which make up the original Bill of Civil Rights.  This process makes changing the constitution so difficult that in 250 years there have been only 17 amendments since the enactment of the United States Constitution.

Today's King Robert's Supreme Court is the worst offender of all of the Supreme Court's over the entire 250 years of the Citizens created Judiciary.

Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

The Letter From a United States Citizen Complaining About The Lack of Any Oversite of Judges Starts Below:

"With us all the branches of the government are elective by the people themselves, except 

the Judiciary, of whose science and qualifications they are not competent judges." 

Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous;
that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and
irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only,
pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become 

law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and 

working its change by construction, before anyone has been busily employed in consuming its substance.

In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account.

             

Thomas Jefferson: letter to Monsieur A. Coray, Oct 31, 1823

Tenney's Win In The Judicial Foreclosure Kansas Appellate Court Case This was Danny Hammond's 1st Complete and Correct Win

 “I was playing for time. Just for time. I played the wrong way, of course.”

Raymond Chandler

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

Case No. 110.359

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Trustee for THE Certificateholders of CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST INC., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007- AMC1, Appellee, 

v. 

DENNIS W. TENNEY and BECKY TENNEY, et aI., Appellants the appellate court stated:

“Per Curiam: “Dennis and Becky Tenney filed a motion to set aside an agreed
judgment of mortgage foreclosure, claiming that the judgment was void. They argued that
U.S. Bank had not shown that it properly held the note secured by the mortgage therefore it was not the real party in interest, and it therefore lacked standing to sue. 

The district court denied the motion, finding that it was untimely. We disagree, because in Kansas lack of standing is jurisdictional and can be raised at any time, and Kansas Law is in lock step with Article III. 

We reverse and remand for a hearing on the question of whether the agreed judgment was void for U.S. Bank's lack of standing.

The district [Kansas state] court heard that motion the same day it was filed. The judge declined to take evidence, but it did hear arguments of counsel. 

The greatest part of the hearing consisted of a colloquy between the district court and the Tenneys' new attorney. Counsel advised the district court that the Tenneys were claiming the judgment was void under Article III and Kansas UCC statute, stating: "I think the judgment is void if they're [U.S. Bank] not the proper party in interest." 

The Tenneys' attorney maintained that the issue of whether a judgment was void for lack of standing could be raised at any time. The district court disagreed.

Continue Reading The First Face To Face Correct Win For Me.

Circuses Face Serious Labor Shortages As More Clowns Continue To Stream Into D.C.

 

                                       by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

In Other News:

From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: BORROWERS AS PRO SE WIN BIG FORECLOSURE FRAUD LAWSUIT AND GET THE HOUSE PLUS $2.5 MILLION DAMAGES

THE FORECLOSURE SOLUTIONS GROUP CLIENT BORROWERS IN COURT, AS PRO-SE, WIN BIG  FORECLOSURE FRAUD LAWSUIT AND GET THEIR HOUSE  PLUS  $2.5 MILLION DAMAGES 

"Turn this thing around, 

 I will not go quietly, 

 I will not lie down, 

 I will not go quietly"

                           Don Henley

This Article is being reprinted and was first posted April 9th, 2015.  I thought my clients would never lose again.  But, it was a slight change from what we are doing now and it couldn't be reproduced.

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

Pro Se means:  I am representing myself in court

MISSOURI STATE JUDGE MARCO A. ROLDAN made this ruling and you can read his very clear explanation on the link just below.

Continue Reading Click Here

There Are 3 Main Issues That I Am Trying To Get Across To You, Which, If You Can Except Them, Will Give You A Better Chance Of Winning

MERS Is Not An Issue.  It Is An Intentional False Issue To Keep You Looking The Wrong Way.

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc, MERSCORP, blah, blah, blah 

Following Are Two Depositions From Years Ago In Which J.K. Arnold, the President and Chief Executive of MERSCORP, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Incorporated, and William C Hultman, Chief Financial Officer Of The Same Two Companies  

Both Men, or Mouses, Describe In A Very Serpentine And Lengthy Manner All Of The Ways That, None of The MERS Phantom Entities Ever Put A Nickel Into Or Took A Nickel Out of Any Loan On Planet Earth, Our Solar System, Or Our Galaxy The Milky Way. 

Before this MERS groups did foreclose, did try to Service Loans etc, etc, etc.

Their names on your Assignments of your Security Instrument (mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed et.) are there in order to make it look like in a most ceremonial way that your mortgage, Promissory Note and the real money in any or this, your remaining DEBT, has been transferred from one party to another with no explanation how this could happen.  You believe that Someone has purchased your loan with the assignment of your mortgage or deed of trust.

This did not happen.  Yes, I am sure.  An assignment of the security instrument cannot not be done either lawfully or in common sense.

Continue Reading

Do You Want To Know Why MERS is not a threat to you? This is Deposition #2 It Is The Story Of MERS Through The Court Testimony Of Chief Financial Officer William Hultman. He Says MERS Never Owned Any Loans

 

The Deposition of William C Hultman The Original Chief Financial Officer of MERS

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY 

Deposition of William C Hultman CFO of MERS & other AKAs

 
DOCKET NO. F-10209-08 
 BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR 
 THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWABS, 
 INC. ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, 
 SERIES 2005-AB3 
 Plaintiff(s),
 vs. 
 VICTOR and ENOABASI UKPE 
 Defendant(s). 
___________________________________________ 
 VICTOR and ENOABASI UKPE 
 Counterclaimants and 
 Third Party Plaintiffs,
 vs.
 BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR 
 THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWABS, 
 INC. ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, 
 SERIES 2005-AB3 
 Defendants on the Counterclaim, 
 and 
 AMERICA'S WHOLESALE LENDER; 
 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.; 
 MORGAN FUNDING CORPORATION, 
 ROBERT CHILDERS; COUNTRYWIDE 
 HOME LOANS SERVICING LP, 
 PHELAN, HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, 
 P.C., 
 Third Party Defendants 
 -------------------- 
 April 7, 2010 
Deposition of William Hultman
DEGNAN & BATEMAN 
(856) 232-7400 
1 Oral sworn video/telephone conference deposition of WILLIAM HULTMAN,

 Attorneys for Ukpes as Defendants and 

 11 GOODWIN PROCTER, LLP  BY: SABRINA M. ROSE-SMITH, ESQUIRE 

13 CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates,  Series 2005-AB3 and Countrywide
15 MORGAN, LEWIS, BOCKIUS, LLP   BY: ROBERT M. BROCHIN, ESQUIRE 16
18 WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER 

CHANCERY DIVISION - ATLANTIC COUNTY  

CONTINUE READING IF YOU REALLY WANT TO FIGURE OUT MERS. IT IS A LITTLE LONG

Deposition #1 MERS Original President & CEO J. K. Arnold: No Matter How Hard It Is To Suspend Your Disbelief, You Gotta Try. MERS Is Not A Valid Concern To You. It Is An Invention With No Purpose Except To Distract You. The Depositions of The MERS Creators Follow. Prove This Myth To Yourself

 

It ain't what you don't know that get's you into trouble, it's what you know for sure that just ain't so!"                                                                                                                                                         -Mark Twain

Deposition of J.K. Arnold President and CEO Incorporated Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., and MERSCORP Inc. (and some other MERS names)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT 2 FOR 3 MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

45 DEBRA A. HENDERSON,

6 Plaintiff,

7 VS. 

                                                                    CIVIL ACTION NO.  CV-08-900805.00

MERSCORP, INC., et al.,
9
Defendants.
10
11 * * * * * * * * * * * * *
12
13 VIDEO DEPOSITION OF R.K. ARNOLD,
14 taken pursuant to stipulation and agreement before
15 Tracye Sadler Blackwell, Certified Court Reporter
16 and Commissioner for the State of Alabama at Large,
17 in the Offices of The American Association for
18 Justice, 777 6th Street, NW, Suite 200, Washington,
19 D.C., on September 25, 2009, commencing at
20 approximately 10:10 a.m.
21
22 * * * * * * * * * * * * *
23
2
1 APPEARANCES 2 3 ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF: 4 Mr. Nicholas H. Wooten
WOOTEN LAW FIRM
5 Attorneys at Law
P.O. Drawer 3389
6 Auburn, Alabama 36831 7 Mr. Lynn W. Jinks, III
JINKS, CROW & DICKSON
8 Attorneys at Law
219 North Prairie Street
9 P.O. Box 350
Union Springs, Alabama 36089
10
11 ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANTS:
12 Mr. Robert M. Brochin
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP
13 Counselors at Law
200 South Biscayne Boulevard
14 Suite 5300
Miami, Florida 33131
-2339
15
Mr. Shaun Ramey
16 SIROTE & PERMUTT
Attorneys at Law
17 2311 Highland Avenue
Birmingham, Alabama 35205
18
Ms. Sharon McGann Horstkamp
19 MERS
Vice President & General Counsel
20 1818 Library Street
Suite 300
21 Reston, Virginia 20190
-5619
22
ALSO PRESENT:
23 Mr. Fred Walker, Videographer
3
1 EXAMINATION INDEX
2
BY MR. WOOTEN . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3
4 EXHIBIT INDEX
5
To Find Out If MERS Is A Real Conern In Your Case, Read Further And Learn For Yourself.  But, Sit Down This Is Very Long.  But, It Eliminates MERS.  If You READ Far Enough
Continue Reading click here

The 3rd Thing I Want You To Really Understand Is. In Order To Prove That Any Of Your Characters Has Standing To Foreclose On You, One Them Can and Must Claim An Injury In Fact To Even File Into Court

How do they keep getting all of the great hands?

Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

The only thing that is worse for the bad guys than none of them claiming You injured them, is if Two Characters claim you Injured them.

There is only (Uno, 1) Foreclosing Party (or parties).  The rest of the characters are just dressed up and swirling around in your way in order to Confuse, Distract, Daze or Lie to you.

Stop trying to prove all of them are committing fraud.  That was never a lawful burden of the Borrower.  Did they claim that you caused Injury to them?  Did any of them ever mention it?

NO.  But, one has to be the foreclosing party who can claim and prove the right to Collect Money From You, because you owe the money to that party.  None of them ever do. 

I have never seen any, not one party, in all of the cases of families in foreclosure I have worked with, party step and and write in their filed documents Claim that "They had suffered an Injury" and in their first filing included Concrete and Particularized Evidence that proved that the injury was real (Injury In Fact) and that using that same evidence proved that they could "Fairly Trace" the causation of their Injury in Fact to the actions of the Borrower (Defendant) (Victim).

If I have never seen this. 

I have never seen any party fulfill this Requirement of proving they had the right to collect money from my clients before they began actions of Foreclosure or Eviction against my clients. 

Then how did 30 million families lose their homes in any real court in the United States.

They did not know it was rigged.

We were fighting fraud while they were rigging the system.

Yes, I finally started winning cases.  26 years after they began rigging them.  By myself it will take 200 years to put it back together.  

Their system is so simple and  so stupid while we all made them look complicated and smart by our racing in circles trying to prove fraud. 

That's how.

The Term "Void" Is Often Used In Contrast To "Voidable" And "Unenforceable". The Main Difference Is That An Action That Is Voidable Remains Valid Until It Is Voided.

“I was playing for time. Just for time. I played the wrong way, of course.”

Raymond Chandler

"Here cum da Judge"

   by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press.

  

Surely no one can truly believe that it is the Borrowers that come up with these bizarre scenarios? 

My sister uh, Mary, is an attorney, who is probably the smartest person I have ever known, was home this weekend and I asked about maybe we should be objecting to the new judge in this case who has oddly not committed a crime yet, and he was going to take over to provide cover for the original judge who had committed all of the crimes by removing the case to Federal Court.  That is like stealing 3rd base from 1st base.  No one would do that.  The Constitution is perfectly clear.  Not on stealing 3rd, but removing a VOID case to Federal court.  You can't do that.  

Although, if he says one more sentence, we are gonna pounce hard on him and make him the defendant, not as a judge but as himself, and make it stick.  

Mary came up with a Motion For Reconsideration, which startled me because I had actually begun to believe that was a term I made up, because I never had a judge comment on it, even though I tried it over 7 and a half billion times while helping Borrowers understand courts and such.

I told her that I just didn't see how you could remove VOID.  It is unthinkable.  Void cannot be arranged.  It is nothingness.  It never was.  It can never even be.

She kind of agreed.  But, neither of us could explain that notion in "earth terms". 

(You see, most attorneys don't ever deal with law all that much.  Except sewer court rat attorneys like ambulance chasers and Borrower representation in foreclosure).  Once again, I must speak up.

Read More

Catch Up With Danny Hammond at mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

PART 1: The Deck Has Been Stacked Against Us. Read What I Have Just Learned Here. Danny Vs Ai And Realizing I Need To Drag Ai Into The Real World Of Foreclosures and Criminal Involvement

Is there a way to save my home, Or is this going to make me cry?

As long as you don't panic while reading, and wait for the ending, I think this justifies my pursuit. 

Watch Me Closely and Don't Look Down!

There is more to this than meets the eye.  What you think is hopeless, has hope.  What gives you hope is hopeless.  

I quit working on foreclosures 3 times while working on all 3 parts below.  In all it was about 8 hours of hoplessness and hope. In the end.  What we need to do is exactly what I have done successfully over the past two years.  

We have lost one great advantage.  However, we never had it.  Several Supreme Courts have been lying to us for a long, long time and they have eroded our constitutional rights.  

In the most heinous and egregious ways they have already given all judges super powers that are not in the constitution.  

The Constitution forbids this.  It does no good to fight it, for now.  We still should win, it is just harder but within reasonable effort.

I have not been much of a fan of Ai Man. But, I never really tried to understand why I found the Answers to be elementary and not of much help if your problems you were trying resolve were not straight up mainstream. Like Crime in Foreclosure. 

I accidentally ran into Ai Man and I just happened to start up a conversation. It lasted 8 hours. Three sessions. I learned how to ask the questions that there was no way Ai Man could answer unless I addressed my questions from my real world perspective. 

Then, "sonofabitch" if I didn't begin to understand what he needed from me to help me.

I gave it up twice. But, just as soon as I walked away, I realized what I wanted to talk about next. It was incredible what I learned by the end of our session.

There is some bad here. Real Bad. But, as I continued this discussion, I found a more limited pathway to saving homes, including mine. But, this pathway is a more solid pathway. If you don't read it all three parts, you won't understand one more thing than you do now.  I won't be able to spend the time trying to explain it to everyone who calls me.  Just read it to the end of the last section.

It all began innocently enough. Neither me or Ai Man suspected the circuitous route it was going to take.


First Question:

 
"Danny to Ai Man: An Interview Between A Man, A Machine and Justice"


Danny to Ai Man: In a civil court case can a defendant sue a Plaintiff for a fully false case?


Ai Man To Danny: Yes, a defendant can sue a plaintiff for a fully false case, though the ability to do so depends on the specific nature of the misconduct and jurisdiction.

Continue Reading This Is What You Need To Know

I Am Astonished That Nearly Everyone Knows That What I Say About The Constitution Is Right. Then They Go Back To Obsessing About Their Fight With A Servicer that never collected money Wthin The Case We Are Contending Doesn't Exist

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." "Since when do you have to agree with people to defend them from injustice?" "If it were not for injustice, man would not know justice." "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."   

                                                                                                               Mark Twain

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

A very good way to show the "too complicated" I have been talking about.  Is the dreadful lack of wins in court when the Borrower is trying to use statute and law against mostly nonexistent or organized racketeer entities pushing their limited, wrong, and mostly "made up" strategies that cannot possibly win without the interference and facilitating of a judge.

I see a lot of wrong rulings now, that seem to be reasoned out, unless you read very carefully.  

In the beginning of the Wall Street Meltdown my judges just didn't recognize that I had even filed anything.  Then ruled Denied or Granted without explanation.  The law gave them 30 days to answer my motions or other filings.  I mean to tell you, they never acknowledged anything I wrote.

All laws and statute both state and Federal are still where they were before.  They have not been stolen or destroyed.  Most were written a long time ago.  For me a long time ago means everything written before 1999.  Things made sense before then. 

READ More Here: Don't Believe That ALL of What You Need Know Was In The Beginning.  Read it all.

The Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements of Article III Standing As Defined By the The United States Supreme Court- From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: Foreclosure Fraud Primer 101 #4

“All power is originally vested in, and consequently derived from, the people.”

                                                                                        The United States Constitution

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press  

The judge promised when he took the job that he, or she, would enforce and protect the laws that come from the constitution and that they would defend the public perception of the court ferociously in order to keep from losing the public trust in the integrity of the court.

Maybe that was too much to ask from some pompous asses. Why did we all expect more of judges and attorneys anyway? If I am any part of the public, then I can tell you for sure, the courts have already lost some of MY public trust.

It is difficult for me to pull Borrowers back from their searches for Promissory Notes, and the Assignments of Mortgage, MERS, PSA, etc., etc., thinking like Dick Tracy and Perry Mason, as well as Captain Kirk looking for a way to "prove" that the party trying to foreclose on them does not have the RIGHT or, STANDING, to do so.

CONTINUE READING

mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

The Borrower Can Challenge The Assignments Of The Security Instruments [mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed etc.] Pursuant To The Rulings In "Slorp": The Full Case is Included Here

"WHAT IF THE HANKY PANKY IS WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT?"

RICK A. SLORP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LERNER, SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; SHELLIE HILL; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

ALL OF THE FORECLOSING PARTIES HAVE BEEN USING THE WORN OUT INTERPRETATION  OF LAW,  SAYING "THE BORROWERS CANNOT CHALLENGE ANY ASSIGNMENTS OF THE MORTGAGE".   BUT, MORTGAGE FRAUD CHANGES ALL OF THAT ACCORDING TO THE SIXTH CIRCUIT APPEALS COURT IN "SLORP"!

   Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

   The Foreclosure Solutions Group

   mtgfrd.workshops@gmail.com

The Imposter Foreclosing Party almost always claims that the Borrower (as the mortgagor) cannot challenge assignments. You did make your Promissory Note negotiable according to the terms of your Promissory Note that you allegedly signed. That is why the foreclosing parties use this interpretation.

But did the foreclosing party buy it legally? No almost assuredly it was never involved in a purchase and sale transaction which even involved any real purchase of your debt.

                                                                                                             READ MORE Click this link 

Would you like a free review of your loan and foreclosure documents?

I Used To Have A List Of All Of The Bad Guys I Have Dealt With In Support Of My Foreclosure Clients. I Did Not Find The Full List Yet. But, I Am Posting What I Did Find Here Today. I Don't Know Why.

 "What If The Hanky Panky,
   Is What It's All About?"

Have you had a run-in with any of the names of this list?  Then your foreclosure was fraudulent and is VOID.  This is not a guess on my part.  During this tear through different courts in different states with my pro se clients over the last 6 months, I was surprised how many of these either still exist or their names are being used by "Successor Imposters"  

LIST OF SHAME  ( This is, I think, a complete list of just the companies that I have dealt with and keywords I have used in 14 years of doing whatever it is that I do.

First in italics are some of the keywords Borrowers found me with.  I have been around so long that my name Danny Hammond is one of the most common used.  I think that is kind of funny in a dark and sinister way.  What other lists must I be on.  

subject matter jurisdiction,Danny Hammond,Article III,Article III of the United States of America,Standing under FRCP Rule 12 (b)(1)  in wrongful foreclosure,Injury in Fact requirement for standing to foreclose,challenge standing,injury in fact,wrongful eviction,self-help eviction,stop eviction,challenge standing, challenge subject matter jurisdiction, foreclosure attorneys, saving my family's home, affordable fraud defenses, pro se, learn what pro se means, fighting foreclosure, consultants,stopping foreclosure, I can represent myself against my lender,save my house,save my home,help me save my home;can't find a foreclosure fraud attorney.

New Rez, LLC dba ShellPoint Servicing registered fictitions name,Ocwen, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Fannie Mae, Federal National Mortgage Association, Green Tree, Nationstar, LITTON LOAN SERVICING, RESIDENTIAL CREDIT, RESCAP LIQUIDATION TRUST,  COUNTRYWIDE  HOME LOANS, ARGENT MORTGAGE Corporation,  AMERIQUEST,  AMERICA'S WHOLESALE LENDERS FREEMONT MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION, FREEMONT INVESTMENT LOANS, CITIMORTGAGE, HSBC MORTGAGE CORP, TAYLOR BEANE & WHITAKER MORTGAGE CORP, FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC, GINNIE MAE, WACHOVIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, ADVANCE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, JP MORGAN CHASE, CHASE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, INDY MAC BANK FSB, AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE, PEOPLES BANK, SUNTRUST BANK, FINANCE AMERICA, LLC, INTERBAY FUNDING, LLC, PULASKI BANK, UNITED FIDELITY FUNDING CORPORATION, WORLD SAVINGS BANK, WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., GMAC MORTGAGE LLC,    DHI MORTGAGE COMPANY LTD,   CARRINGTON MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST,  Carrington Mortgage,  FRANKLIN BANK SSB, BANK OF AMERICA, NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE, MORTGAGE ONE CORP, MORTGAGE LENDER'S NETWORK USA, INC. AEGIS FUNDING CORP, WILMINGTON FINANCE,a division of AIG Federal Savings Bank, Caliber Mortgage, US BANK N.A., RESCAP GMAC MORTGAGE LLC FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY FRAUD, Deutsche Bank, Deutsch Bank National Trust Company as Trustee, Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, US Bank N.A. as Trustee, Bank of New York as Trustee, Deutsche Bank, Deutsch Bank National Trust Company as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, US Bank N.A. as Trustee,  Bank of New York "BONY" as Trustee, OCWEN, NATIONSTAR, GREEN TREE, SETERUS, EverBank, A Bunch of REMIC TRUSTS, DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, LITTON LOAN SERVICING (OR OTHER SIMILAR NAMES), COUNTRYWIDE  HOME LOANS  (and many similar names now owned by Bank of America and known as BAC,

READ MORE by going through our YouTube Channel

MORTGAGE FRAUD: It Is A Straight Line! Your Entire Fraudulent Foreclosure Case Is Based On A Straight Line With No Gaps. But In Today's Corrupted System There Are Always Unexplainable Gaps.

"I have complete faith in the continued absurdity of whatever's going on."

                                                                                                  John Stewart 

                           

Republished by Danny Hammond

I have read, and I still read, many messages from Borrowers

who are looking for help against mortgage fraud and wrongful foreclosure involving their homes.  Lately, I have run into

several Facebook Groups that exist for their members to collaborate and share their own searches on the internet and strategies that they have heard about or read about.  There are some issues with this that are causing them to  get overwhelmed and stuck.  

I know a lot about this.  Not because I am so smart, but because I am familiar with being overwhelmed and stuck.

It was easier for me to overcome because I learned about the Chain of Title of records recorded against the property that houses sit on starting at 12 years old with my Dad.  Most people never really deal with it more than once or twice in their lives.

Everything in life has a straight line.  A beginning and the middle and the end.  They never change positions.  In real estate, the straight line is usually more obvious than say a drive across the country.

CONTINUE READING                 

Would you like a free review of your loan and foreclosure documents?

A Question From The Comments Section of Our YouTube Channel: "Is It True, That State Laws Allow A Foreclosure To Take Place Without The Foreclosing Party Producing The Note?"

 An escalator can never break, 

It can only become stairs.

You should never see an "Escalator Temporarily Out Of Order" sign,

Just "Escalator Temporarily Stairs" "Sorry for the convenience"

      
                                        Mitch Hedberg

 

By Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

First, I have an update.  A real update.  It is a good update and it concerns the workshops.

UPDATE ON THE WORKSHOPS: 

I have faced one obstacle after another in putting together the workshops.  This is taking too long and I know there are people that are running out of time.  

But, our luck has finally changed, I have found an amazing and talented person to build a staff from and to help me.  The difference is amazing.  I will be ready in the very near future to start accepting applicants.

Now, back to:

  

"Is it true that state laws allow a foreclosure to take place without the Foreclosing Party producing the Note?"

For 14 years I have continuously been asked if "your lender" can foreclose without the Promissory Note. This requires a 2 part Answer.

READ MORE: THIS ONE IS VERY IMPORTANT

ALSO, See my Article, Down a few Posts: Or click here: "Let's All Take 3 Steps Back From Crazy!"