Sunday, August 30, 2026

ATTENTION: Danny Hammond Q & A THURSDAY (tomorrow night) 10-08-2026 7 pm Central




ATTENTION!

The Foreclosure Solutons Group & Danny Hammond Q & A

Every Sunday and Thursday evening beginning

Tomorrow Thursday 10-08-2026

7 pm  Central

These will be FREE for two weeks

After those four sessions, we will evaluate your interest to see if it is worthwhile to do

Let us know how you feel about attending at:
mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

FREE ZOOM CODE WILL BE POSTED HERE 

HERE




This Question and Answer Session is being scheduled for for two reasons

1.) I have finally put together the beginning of a Good Staff. But, through what I hope is me getting my MoJo back, the addition is one man and he has more talent and knowledge than I deserve to have joining me. 2.) We have progressed at an astonishing pace. Is there a strategy being used by the bad guys that is repetitive? What is it?


Or. Our website: https://foreclosurefraudanswers.blogspot.com Or, Facebook: Search for Danny Hammond Foreclosure Solutions Group https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100063547893864

Wednesday, July 1, 2026

The Borrower Can Challenge The Assignments Of The Security Instruments [mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed etc.] Pursuant To The Rulings In "Slorp": The Full Case is Included Here

"WHAT IF THE HANKY PANKY IS WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT?"





   Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press
   The Foreclosure Solutions Group

   

RICK A. SLORP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LERNER, SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; SHELLIE HILL; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

ALL OF THE FORECLOSING PARTIES HAVE BEEN USING THE WORN OUT INTERPRETATION  OF LAW,  SAYING "THE BORROWERS CANNOT CHALLENGE ANY ASSIGNMENTS OF THE MORTGAGE".   BUT, MORTGAGE FRAUD CHANGES ALL OF THAT ACCORDING TO THE SIXTH CIRCUIT APPEALS COURT IN "SLORP"!



The Imposter Foreclosing Party almost always claims that the Borrower (as the mortgagor) cannot challenge assignments. You did make your Promissory Note negotiable according to the terms of your Promissory Note that you allegedly signed. That is why the foreclosing parties use this interpretation.

But did the foreclosing party buy it legally? No almost assuredly it was never involved in a purchase and sale transaction which even involved 
any real purchase of your debt.
                                                                                                             READ MORE Click this link 

Learn the Hanky Panky with Danny Hammond - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

If you wish to ask questions about your foreclosure problems CLICK HERE

Thursday, June 25, 2026

What If Your Wrongful Foreclosure Was Already Void, But You Were Unaware Of This Fact?

What If Your Wrongful Foreclosure Was Already Void, But You Were Unaware Of This Fact?   

There Is A Good Chance That Is True.


If you don't stick to your values when they're being tested, they're not values: they're hobbies.
               Jon Stewart

Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 court press
04-21-2022

Find Danny Hammond mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

I have just read a very long email from a borrower who was trying to tell me how he had proven over and over that the foreclosing party which does not exist, did not have the right to foreclose. He has been in court for years and suffered nearly unimaginable suffering and pain and costs.



But, I can imagine. I can remember trying to figure out the courts.

It shouldn't be that hard, should it? The courts seem crazy. But, what if Chuck's court is only incompetent? What if this judge is just a no-talent judge guy.


If you wish to ask questions about your foreclosure problems Click Here

Monday, June 15, 2026

A Letter From One Who Was Uniquely Qualified To Point Out The Chronic and Permanent Deficiencies In Setting Up The Constitutional Judiciary



In The Constitution, It is stated that it is the citizens who must defend the 

Constitution from defects or intentional changes when it is absolutely 

imperative.


Below is a letter considering whether the founders had made a grave error in establishing the parity of the 3 branches of government.  It is a fundamental problem today.

It is singularly responsible for the foreclosure crisis today.

The different Supreme Courts over decades and centuries have slowly created laws (which only Congress can do) covering the total ass of every judge by giving all judges (including their asses) Absolute Immunity. 

No matter what intentional or unintentional unlawful every judge has Absolute Immunity from being sued by the Parties in court case. Again. Absolute Immunity if your house is taken in a crime in which a judge was a co-conspirator.  

My strategy will still work, but it may be harder.  My problem with this is that the Constitution is clear that no citizen can be raised higher than any other citizen.  This is especially covered the 5th,11th, and 14th Amendments to the Constitution.  These Common Law abominations are just made up by multiple Supreme Courts.  They are inventions of convenience and not real laws.  They  didn't try to amend the constitution.  They just buried all of the self-invented self interest changes in common law backwater.

They made law.  They made every judge, not matter what he has done, untouchable and irresponsible for any act or crime they commit.  They can't do that, so those changes they made to protect their asses, but not ours, are unconstitutional.

There is no change in any of the words of those Amendments in the Constitution.  They changed constitutional law and buried these laws they made up which could only done following:

Only a majority vote in both houses in Congress and a vote of yes, by the citizens of 2/3 of the all of the states can amend the constitution.  There were ten amendments added immediately which make up the original Bill of Civil Rights.  This process makes changing the constitution so difficult that in 250 years there have been only 17 amendments since the enactment of the United States Constitution.

Today's King Robert's Supreme Court is the worst offender of all of the Supreme Court's over the entire 250 years of the Citizens created Judiciary.

Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

The Letter From a United States Citizen Complaining About The Lack of Any Oversite of Judges Starts Below:

"With us all the branches of the government are elective by the people themselves, except 
the Judiciary, of whose science and qualifications they are not competent judges." 

Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous;
that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and
irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only,
pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become 
law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and 
working its change by construction, before anyone has been busily employed in consuming its substance.

In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account.

             
Thomas Jefferson: letter to Monsieur A. Coray, Oct 31, 1823   



Reach Us At This Email    mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: DIRTY DEEDS DONE DIRT CHEAP: All You Need To Know About That Servicer & Successor Trustee You Say is After You

 FORECLOSURE FRAUD DEPENDS ON JUST A FEW PLAYERS TO BE SUCCESSFUL.

BUT THEY MUST BE CRIMINAL PLAYERS

THE MOST IMPORTANT IS THE 

SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE AND HE/SHE/IT IS/ARE THE ONLY ONE YOU REALLY CAN SUE

THE SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE PERFORMED AN ILLEGAL ACT IN THE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE

A FORECLOSURE DEED WAS CREATED {FORGERY} THEN IT WAS RECORDED {WIRE FRAUD} 

"Pick up the phone, I'm here alone, or you could make a social call
I'm always home.  Call me at any time. 

Just ring 362-436-####
I lead a life of crime!

Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!

Dirty Deeds and their done dirt cheap!  AC DC


This article is dedicated to the six foreclosure mill law firms that were "appointed" to be Substitute Trustees" by fictitious Lenders to fraudulently foreclose on 14,400 families in Jackson County Missouri alone.  For each year, for the last five years.  Creating displaced refugee families at numbers rivaling anywhere in the world.  
          
Jackson County is just one medium-sized county in the United States.  

If you want me to name these firms in this blog and tell what I know about each one, then fill out the form below (you don't have to put your name or contact info) just let me know that you are pissed off.)  
I hate the idea that I'm the only person in the world who is pissed off.  That would mean I have a problem with reality.
 






Wednesday, June 3, 2026

Tenney's Win In The Judicial Foreclosure Kansas Appellate Court Case This was Danny Hammond's 1st Complete and Correct Win

 “I was playing for time. Just for time. I played the wrong way, of course.”

Raymond Chandler










by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press


Case No. 110.359

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Trustee for THE Certificateholders of CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST INC., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007- AMC1, Appellee, 

v. 


DENNIS W. TENNEY and BECKY TENNEY, et aI., Appellants the appellate court stated:

“Per Curiam: “Dennis and Becky Tenney filed a motion to set aside an agreed
judgment of mortgage foreclosure, claiming that the judgment was void. They argued that
U.S. Bank had not shown that it properly held the note secured by the mortgage therefore it was not the real party in interest, and it therefore lacked standing to sue. 

The district court denied the motion, finding that it was untimely. We disagree, because in Kansas lack of standing is jurisdictional and can be raised at any time, and Kansas Law is in lock step with Article III. 

The district [Kansas state] court heard that motion the same day it was filed. The judge declined to take evidence, but it did hear arguments of counsel. 

The greatest part of the hearing consisted of a colloquy between the district court and the Tenneys' new attorney. Counsel advised the district court that the Tenneys were claiming the judgment was void under Article III and Kansas UCC statute, stating: "I think the judgment is void if they're [U.S. Bank] not the proper party in interest." 

The Tenneys' attorney maintained that the issue of whether a judgment was void for lack of standing could be raised at any time. The district court disagreed.

Continue Reading      The First Face To Face and Correct Win For Me.


Find Danny Hammond - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

If you wish to ask questions about your foreclosure problems

Let us know at this email:  mtgfrd.info@gmail.com



If you wish to ask questions about your foreclosure problems

Let us know at this email:  mtgfrd.info@gmail.com




Tuesday, June 2, 2026

LET'S ALL JUST TAKE THREE STEPS BACK FROM CRAZY! THAT IS RULE #1-- WHEN FIGHTING MORTGAGE FRAUD: Carpenter v Longan 1872; [Also On YouTube Channel] @mtgfrd

 


Heirs of a cold war,  that's what we've become, Inheriting troubles,  I'm mentally numb

Crazy,..... I just cannot bear,  That I'm living with something that just isn't fair, 
Mental wounds not healing.....Who and what's to blame

I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train,  I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train
                                                                                                                      Ozzy Osborne




THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE:  "ASSIGNMENT OF YOUR MORTGAGE",

EVEN THOUGH IT HAS BEEN USED ILLEGALLY 30 MILLION TIMES IN 22 YEARS




The Supreme Court settled the matter of assigning a mortgage or deed of trust in 1872. You can't assign those instruments.  The case is CARPENTER V LONGAN AND THE CASE IS IN THIS ARTICLE JUST BELOW. 

Find out why any assignment of the security agreement is void.  Keep reading.




Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press


I have reviewed hundreds, possibly thousands of home loan paperwork preceding a fraudulent foreclosure.   I have read about many more.  I have never seen any deal where the foreclosing party was not relying on an assignment of the security instrument.  

IN THE 26 STATES THAT USE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE THE MORTGAGE IS CALLED A DEED OF TRUST.  THE WORD MORTGAGE IS RARELY SPOKEN IN THESE STATES.

In Judicial foreclosure states, the assignment of the security instrument involves what is called a mortgage.  A mortgage is not a home loan.  It is merely the rule book concerning the collateral you put up to ensure that the bank will be paid back.  


A mortgage has no value and the assignment of a mortgage does NOT transfer your home loan from one party to another.  In the Non-Judicial States, the security instrument is called a Deed of Trust which serves the same purpose as a mortgage.  There is no such thing as "the assignment of a mortgage or a deed of trust.  The mortgage or deed of trust exists only as part of the loan agreement and it is incidental.  The security instrument is known as the incidental instrument (there are no laws that require collateral for a loan at all.)  


Your house is the usual collateral involving a home loan because that is where the loan money was spent.  But, collateral could also consist of one thousand Schwinn bicycles in a warehouse.  It is my strong personal belief that all (ALL) of the foreclosures in the United States from about the year 2000, or earlier, are based on the exact (EXACT) same lie.  What is that lie?


CARPENTER V LONGAN (SUPREME COURT 1872)  
THE ENTIRE RULING IS NEXT


For questions, comments or clowning around with Danny Hammond - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

If you wish to ask questions about your foreclosure problems CLICK HERE

Saturday, May 30, 2026

Circuses Face Serious Labor Shortages As More Clowns Continue To Stream Into D.C.

 

For questions, comments or clowning around with Danny Hammond - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com



                                                   by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press





In Other News:



by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press



From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: BORROWERS AS PRO SE WIN BIG FORECLOSURE FRAUD LAWSUIT AND GET THE HOUSE PLUS $2.5 MILLION DAMAGES

THE FORECLOSURE SOLUTIONS GROUP CLIENT BORROWERS IN COURT, AS PRO-SE, WIN BIG  FORECLOSURE FRAUD LAWSUIT AND GET THEIR HOUSE  PLUS  $2.5 MILLION DAMAGES 

"Turn this thing around, 
 I will not go quietly, 
 I will not lie down, 
 I will not go quietly"
                           Don Henley

This Article is being reprinted and was first posted April 9th, 2015.  I thought my clients would never lose again.  But, it was a slight change from what we are doing now and it couldn't be reproduced.

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

Pro Se means:  I am representing myself in court

MISSOURI STATE JUDGE MARCO A. ROLDAN made this ruling and you can read his very clear explanation on the link just below.

Continue Reading Click Here

Find Danny Hammond - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

If you wish to ask questions about your foreclosure problems CLICK HERE

Friday, May 29, 2026

MORTGAGE FRAUD: It Is A Straight Line! Your Entire Fraudulent Foreclosure Case Is Based On A Straight Line With No Gaps. But In Today's Corrupted System There Are Always Unexplainable Gaps.

"I have complete faith in the continued absurdity of whatever's going on."

                                                                                                  John Stewart 
                           
Republished by Danny Hammond
I have read, and I still read, many messages from Borrowers
who are looking for help against mortgage fraud and wrongful foreclosure involving their homes.  Lately, I have run into
several Facebook Groups that exist for their members to collaborate and share their own searches on the internet and strategies that they have heard about or read about.  There are some issues with this that are causing them to  get overwhelmed and stuck.  

I know a lot about this.  Not because I am so smart, but because I am familiar with being overwhelmed and stuck.

It was easier for me to overcome because I learned about the Chain of Title of records recorded against the property that houses sit on starting at 12 years old with my Dad.  Most people never really deal with it more than once or twice in their lives.

Everything in life has a straight line.  A beginning and the middle and the end.  They never change positions.  In real estate, the straight line is usually more obvious than say a drive across the country.


If you wish to ask questions about your foreclosure problems CLICK HERE
             


Hang Glide With Danny Hammond by email  mtgfrd.info@gmail.com



Thursday, May 28, 2026

The Term "Void" Is Often Used In Contrast To "Voidable" And "Unenforceable". The Main Difference Is That An Action That Is Voidable Remains Valid Until It Is Voided.

“I was playing for time. Just for time. I played the wrong way, of course.”
Raymond Chandler



"Here cum da Judge"




   by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press.

  


Surely no one can truly believe that it is the Borrowers that come up with these bizarre scenarios? 

My sister uh, Mary, is an attorney, who is probably the smartest person I have ever known, was home this weekend and I asked about maybe we should be objecting to the new judge in this case who has oddly not committed a crime yet, and he was going to take over to provide cover for the original judge who had committed all of the crimes by removing the case to Federal Court.  That is like stealing 3rd base from 1st base.  No one would do that.  The Constitution is perfectly clear.  Not on stealing 3rd, but removing a VOID case to Federal court.  You can't do that.  

Although, if he says one more sentence, we are gonna pounce hard on him and make him the defendant, not as a judge but as himself, and make it stick.  

Mary came up with a Motion For Reconsideration, which startled me because I had actually begun to believe that was a term I made up, because I never had a judge comment on it, even though I tried it over 7 and a half billion times while helping Borrowers understand courts and such.

I told her that I just didn't see how you could remove VOID.  It is unthinkable.  Void cannot be arranged.  It is nothingness.  It never was.  It can never even be.

She kind of agreed.  But, neither of us could explain that notion in "earth terms". 

(You see, most attorneys don't ever deal with law all that much.  Except sewer court rat attorneys like ambulance chasers and Borrower representation in foreclosure).  Once again, I must speak up.


Would you like for us to review your loan?   Click Here

Then Return Here To Click On To Older Posts


When You Reach The Last Post, There Are Still Over 200 More Look Down Below And To The Right

                                                                                                       And Just Below You Will See      Older Posts
                                                                                                                                                                    Click on Older Posts 
                                                                                                                                                                            Look Down Here

Tuesday, May 12, 2026

The 3rd Thing I Want You To Really Understand Is. In Order To Prove That Any Of Your Characters Has Standing To Foreclose On You, Only One Of Them Can and Only If He/She/They/Them/It Actually Claims An Injury In Fact.




The only thing that is worse for the bad guys than none of them claiming You injured them, is if Two Characters claim you Injured them.

There is only (Uno, 1) Foreclosing
Party (or parties).  The rest of the characters are just dressed up and swirling around in your way in order to Confuse, Distract, Daze and Lie to you.

Stop trying to prove all of them are committing fraud.  That was never a lawful burden of the Borrower.  Did they claim that you caused Injury to them?  Did any of them ever mention it?

NO.  But, one has to be the foreclosing party who can claim and prove the right to Collect Money From You, because you owe the money to that party.  None of them ever do. 

I have never seen any, not one party, in all of the cases of families in foreclosure I have worked with. 

I have not seen even one party step and and write in their filed documents a Claim that "They had suffered an Injury" and in their first filing included Concrete and Particularized Evidence that proved that the injury was real (Injury In Fact) and that using that same evidence proved that they could "Fairly Trace" the causation of their Injury in Fact to the actions of the Borrower (Defendant) (Victim).

I have never seen this. 

I have never seen any party fulfill this Requirement of proving they had the right to collect money from my clients before they began actions of Foreclosure or Eviction against my clients. 

Then how did 30 million families lose their homes in any real court in the United States?

They did not know it was rigged.

We were all fighting fraud while they were rigging the system.

Yes, I finally started winning cases.  26 years after they began rigging them.  By myself it will take 200 years to put it all back together.  

Their system is so simple and so stupid and we all made them look brilliant, complicated and smart by our racing in circles trying to prove fraud. 


By Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press  at mtgfrd.info@gmail.com



If you wish to ask questions about your foreclosure problems CLICK HERE


Wednesday, April 29, 2026

Fraudulent Foreclosure and the Danny Hammond MIKE SINGLETARY Offense For Borrowers Facing Fraudulent Foreclosure

“There is only one way to succeed in anything and that is to give it everything.”

                                                                             Vince Lombardi


Reposted because it is the 3rd most popular article out of 271 articles still posted


by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press
mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

The theory behind my "Mike Singletary Mortgage Fraud Offense" begins with the premise that in your foreclosure court there are some nameless players who aren't really affecting the game as much as you think.

These players include the Imposter and Fictitious Payee Foreclosing party who is pushing a baseless claim and its attorneys who are the puppets voicing this claim. But, there is one party in your court who is keeping you from winning.

It is no secret that I think it is your judge and I am almost always right.  So, to explain my strategy let's pretend that your court is a football game. You are in the right which puts you down on your opponent's 30-yard line with the ball and one minute left to score a touchdown and win the game.   Your foreclosure judge is the embodiment of Mike Singletary. For the 8 people in America who are not children, but still haven't heard of Mike Singletary, he was the phenomenal middle linebacker who was drafted by the Chicago Bears in the 2nd round of the 1981 NFL Draft and became to be known as probably the greatest linebacker of all time as "The Heart of the Defense" for the Chicago Bears' Monsters of the Midway in the mid-1980s.

So, in my little metaphor, Mike Singletary represents your judge and he has been knocking down passes, sacking you, the quarterback, stuffing all the running plays and pretty much controlling the game. He is offsides on every play.  He is holding lineman, interfering with pass receivers, roughing the quarterback and generally is operating with complete disregard for the rules.  There is no accountability for his actions.  No one will argue with him.  He is accountable to no one.  There are no consequences for his actions.

You are not going to win if Mike Singletary continues to play.

Therefore, Mike Singletary must be removed from play, no matter what it takes. So, you call a timeout and on the next play, you send 15 players on the field and hike the ball to the quarterback who takes a knee while the other 14 players pile on Mike and twist his ankles, bite his ears, and break his arm.

This is, of course, against the rules so you accept your penalty for "too many men on the field " and huddle up. Three plays later you score. You win because you neutralized the one person who is intent on beating you on this day and he could have without your brutal and decisive action.

If you wish to ask questions about your foreclosure problems CLICK HERE

RACE Coast To Coast In the 2026 Cannonball Run With Danny Hammond  mtgfrd.info@gmail.com 



Wednesday, April 15, 2026

MY NEW METAPHOR FOR "MORTGAGE FRAUD" IS A GAMBLING CASINO THAT LET'S NO ONE WIN WITHOUT ANYONE REALIZING IT

“He snorted and hit me in the solar plexus. I bent over and took hold of the room with both hands and spun it. When I had it nicely spinning I gave it a full swing and hit myself on the back of the head with the floor.” 
                      Raymond Chandler

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

This was originally posted 04-16-2016 on this website.  I am reposting it because I like it.


I am always trying to find a simpler way to describe how there could even possibly be so many illegal foreclosures because it has been very difficult to explain to someone who is unaware of the size and scale of the scheme of something that really is kind of unbelievable.


Then in a conversation yesterday I thought of an example of how something could be done right in front of the eyes of everyone without anyone seeing it.


Let me know if you think this is a good metaphor for Wall Street and Mortgage Fraud.

A casino decides to not let anyone win. There are 1000 people on the gambling floor, but few of them know each other. All of them are losing consistently. 

Each of them thinks that they are having a bad night of gambling because "it happens". 


All of them go home losers, but they have no clue that everyone else went home a loser too.


There were no winners. It never occurs to any of them that all of them have been robbed in plain sight.


Of course, the casino keeps all of the money because no one knows it is missing." 




If you  would like for us to review your loan documents   Click Here