"It Could Happen To You"
Saturday, October 31, 2026
Friday, October 30, 2026
"LITTLE COUPONS"
And the men who hold high places, Must be the ones to Start,
To mold a new reality, Closer to the Heart.
The Blacksmith and the Artist, Reflect it in their art
and Forge their creativity, Closer to the Heart.
Philosophers and Ploughmen, Each must know his part
& Sow a new Mentality, Closer to the Heart.
You can be the Captain and I will draw the Chart,
Sailing into destiny, Closer to the Heart.
Closer to the Heart.
Rock Band "Rush"
"LITTLE COUPONS"
by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press
Even then it came from two completely different situations.
Judges have all along been making egregious rulings long after the Constitution has demanded they should not have. We have seen it for what it was from the beginning. But, believing was from day one was impossible. No one had seen it before so our brains told us to fight servicers. Which is nothing but a distraction and should be ignored.
_____________________________________________________
We are seeing more of the good guys who have platforms that are fighting consumer fraud and abuse and more, as kind of "consumer protection" effort. These separate leaders are beginning to reach out to each other to strengthen what they do now and add more knowledge and partners in order to add more categories through partnerships to the number of public abuses of the citizens of the United States.
_____________________________________________________
We are seeing more of the good guys who have platforms that are fighting consumer fraud and abuse and more, as kind of "consumer protection" effort. These separate leaders are beginning to reach out to each other to strengthen what they do now and add more knowledge and partners in order to add more categories through partnerships to the number of public abuses of the citizens of the United States.
I have had help from one such leader and I want to thank him and to tell you, dear reader, that I have had a new website created and it will go online right here.
Soon: "The Foreclosure Solutions Group & Danny Hammond"
Website Exclusively Created and Powered by
"Joseph Fain McDaniel"
This was an unexpected and sincere gesture. I have spoken to his group and answered Foreclosure questions. Everthing Top Notch with Joseph.
______________________________________________________
Back to the Post "Little Coupons" There was a critical reason that most Borrowers and even myself did not have the reasoning power in our past to us all to see the problem without great difficulty.
But, natural and sadly learned biases beginning in the 2nd grade prohibited all Borrowers who had the clean story of America from *Leave It to Beaver* & *Teletubbies* imprinted on their very consciousness were doomed in a lot of ways.
Do you remember the 2nd grade? Do you also remember 2nd Grade Social Studies and the lessons about professionals in your community and how they contributed to all of our lives positively?
(If you lived in another country, it may not have been identical.)
But, natural and sadly learned biases beginning in the 2nd grade prohibited all Borrowers who had the clean story of America from *Leave It to Beaver* & *Teletubbies* imprinted on their very consciousness were doomed in a lot of ways.
But to continue: I don't know if I spelled the "Telli" part correctly.
Regardless of spelling, I watched these shows 6 times a day while my children were growing up, and now I watch them with grandchildren, who never seemed to care about the spelling.
They just wanted me quiet while the Teletubbies were speaking to them about very complicated high brow issues, in the language of "high falutin?" (That may be redundant and again, I am not sure of the spelling.)
Do you remember the 2nd grade? Do you also remember 2nd Grade Social Studies and the lessons about professionals in your community and how they contributed to all of our lives positively?
(If you lived in another country, it may not have been identical.)
However it was also still there. the lesson is imprinted on your brain in another language, but you don't know that and you adjust back and forth naturally. Of course if you were in a truly dire situation like you somehow WERE on deck during the sinking of the Titanic, you may have screamed in MULTIPLE languages.
EARLY ON; We learned about what grown ups do in our community (which we already knew about my dad. "Turn off the lights when you leave a room and take out the trash before it covers the trash can in the corner of the kitchen.")
EARLY ON; We learned about what grown ups do in our community (which we already knew about my dad. "Turn off the lights when you leave a room and take out the trash before it covers the trash can in the corner of the kitchen.")
That is what I remembered,
but the teacher meant the careers of those protecting the community or making it move forward correctly. There was the badly drawn man in a police uniform. He is a policeman, if someone is beating you up or your house is on fire you call the policeman and in the second instance, he would call the fireman. You can trust both of these professionals to do their duty.
Next was a man in a tunic with a cool silver mirror on his forehead which helped him see his brain when he was thinking. His main job was to help you get well when you were sick. You could always depend on him to help you honestly by giving you a bill to pay, which is better than him openly stealing from your mom.
We then learned about another man...... (strangely women stayed at home all day in full woman official daily dress including a bead necklace. But she had no car until the man of the house came home from work. That must be where the saying "women of the night came from."
Women did not account for much in the views of men in general. That is until 1920, when women gave every man in the U.S., "The Look".
"The Look" which some woman invented and they all took it right up using it in a very united way, and forcing every man in DC; and a majority vote in 2/3 of the states to vote to give women the right to vote in the 19th Amendment on August 18, 1920.
That still isn't as good as some other groups.
Hell, blacks got the right to vote twice as many times as women did.
First in 1870: The 15th Amendment; and then again in the 1965 Civil Rights Act);
Women still are still angry about getting the right to vote only one time.
But, back to who helped you when the doctor thought you were too sick and needed medicine, it was the Pharmacist, who kept medicine in his home or office. Pharmacists were also regulars on whom you could depend.
Then there WERE MORE PROFESSIONALS WHO KEPT THE MACHINERY OF YOUR TOWN RUNNING, the butcher, the baker, and the candlestick maker. Next came bankers and lawyers, Oh dear, they are not all the same. Wait. Maybe they are.
Oh yeah, and the janitor who kept the floors clean at school. I still do trust them.
We were taught that all of these professionals were equally trained, equally smart, equally honest and cared about doing their job well. We grew up believing in this oddly American Grimm's Brothers Fairly tales.
We didn't just learn these things, they became ingrained and stamped on our very being. They became part of us. You should obey the law, everyone else does. That one doesn't help in foreclosure events, I know that for sure.
This all became absolutes as we grew up. When one of these professionals betrays you with any of these significant trust canons—for instance, by hurting or cheating someone like you and stealing your home—this betrayal of the American Dream doesn't register correctly like it happened instead of what you were told in the 2nd grade.
We are vulnerable beyond any self-control to a conspiracy built around two or more of these people, when we discover they would betray the trust.
We think, "This must be a mistake." It is part of how we think as the explanation to a child is interpreted by the adult.
"Now, as promised, I will detail my language beliefs theory. It is just as valid as I can think it is.
We really start getting good at English, the language we communicate with, in the 2nd grade also.
It is kind of the same. It is early in life and English is so stamped upon our subconscious that we never forget it.
I have never seen something that so rattled me that in the excitement I somehow broke out into speaking Chinese because I forgot how to speak English.
That has never happened to me. Never. There have been an estimated 25 million to 40 million American red blooded homes wrongfully foreclosed since 2002.
I hope there are others that are doing what I am doing for this for the right reason, but it does not seem so.
Saving people can be limited if the people being saved number in the millions. I cannot help millions by helping one person at a time. The signup applications we can handle are nearly full right now.
If your problem is immediate you need to get hold of us right away, or our help may be delayed. I am not the Batman, and Ken is not Robin (although due to a birth defect Ken can fly).
Also, we can't save everyone's home, especially if the Borrower cannot learn that what I believe to be true is true. It is just true.
Taking up my time needlessly to explain over and over is not productive for us or you.
The Borrower needs to follow our directions quickly. My strategy depends on speed and astonishment.
Not whether you think the devil done it, or your Servicer might be the Foreclosing Party. I really do know they or it is not. Even if I haven't even seen your documents yet.
IF NO ONE IS CHEATING, THEN THE 30 to 40 MILLION WRONGFUL AMERICAN FAMIY FORECLOSURES NUMBER, COULD NOT BE TRUE.
I am Danny Hammond and I have never seen a legal foreclosure presented. I have never heard or read the Constitutional words required from the Foreclosing party to meet the minimum requirements of Standing.
So there cannot be a foreclosing party in a court trying to foreclose on you. I just tricked you. These Racketeers are tricking you too.
The problem is you.
The Borrower trying to fight against some fake servicer and prove he/she/it/ or whatever, is committing fraud against you is going to lose. Probably, very quickly.
You are trying to use your detective and judge reasoning skills that you learned on Perry Mason, or if you are younger, "Boston Legal".
Next was a man in a tunic with a cool silver mirror on his forehead which helped him see his brain when he was thinking. His main job was to help you get well when you were sick. You could always depend on him to help you honestly by giving you a bill to pay, which is better than him openly stealing from your mom.
We then learned about another man...... (strangely women stayed at home all day in full woman official daily dress including a bead necklace. But she had no car until the man of the house came home from work. That must be where the saying "women of the night came from."
Women did not account for much in the views of men in general. That is until 1920, when women gave every man in the U.S., "The Look".
"The Look" which some woman invented and they all took it right up using it in a very united way, and forcing every man in DC; and a majority vote in 2/3 of the states to vote to give women the right to vote in the 19th Amendment on August 18, 1920.
That still isn't as good as some other groups.
Hell, blacks got the right to vote twice as many times as women did.
First in 1870: The 15th Amendment; and then again in the 1965 Civil Rights Act);
Women still are still angry about getting the right to vote only one time.
But, back to who helped you when the doctor thought you were too sick and needed medicine, it was the Pharmacist, who kept medicine in his home or office. Pharmacists were also regulars on whom you could depend.
Then there WERE MORE PROFESSIONALS WHO KEPT THE MACHINERY OF YOUR TOWN RUNNING, the butcher, the baker, and the candlestick maker. Next came bankers and lawyers, Oh dear, they are not all the same. Wait. Maybe they are.
Oh yeah, and the janitor who kept the floors clean at school. I still do trust them.
We were taught that all of these professionals were equally trained, equally smart, equally honest and cared about doing their job well. We grew up believing in this oddly American Grimm's Brothers Fairly tales.
We didn't just learn these things, they became ingrained and stamped on our very being. They became part of us. You should obey the law, everyone else does. That one doesn't help in foreclosure events, I know that for sure.
This all became absolutes as we grew up. When one of these professionals betrays you with any of these significant trust canons—for instance, by hurting or cheating someone like you and stealing your home—this betrayal of the American Dream doesn't register correctly like it happened instead of what you were told in the 2nd grade.
We are vulnerable beyond any self-control to a conspiracy built around two or more of these people, when we discover they would betray the trust.
We think, "This must be a mistake." It is part of how we think as the explanation to a child is interpreted by the adult.
"Now, as promised, I will detail my language beliefs theory. It is just as valid as I can think it is.
We really start getting good at English, the language we communicate with, in the 2nd grade also.
It is kind of the same. It is early in life and English is so stamped upon our subconscious that we never forget it.
I have never seen something that so rattled me that in the excitement I somehow broke out into speaking Chinese because I forgot how to speak English.
That has never happened to me. Never. There have been an estimated 25 million to 40 million American red blooded homes wrongfully foreclosed since 2002.
I hope there are others that are doing what I am doing for this for the right reason, but it does not seem so.
Saving people can be limited if the people being saved number in the millions. I cannot help millions by helping one person at a time. The signup applications we can handle are nearly full right now.
If your problem is immediate you need to get hold of us right away, or our help may be delayed. I am not the Batman, and Ken is not Robin (although due to a birth defect Ken can fly).
Also, we can't save everyone's home, especially if the Borrower cannot learn that what I believe to be true is true. It is just true.
Taking up my time needlessly to explain over and over is not productive for us or you.
The Borrower needs to follow our directions quickly. My strategy depends on speed and astonishment.
Not whether you think the devil done it, or your Servicer might be the Foreclosing Party. I really do know they or it is not. Even if I haven't even seen your documents yet.
IF NO ONE IS CHEATING, THEN THE 30 to 40 MILLION WRONGFUL AMERICAN FAMIY FORECLOSURES NUMBER, COULD NOT BE TRUE.
I am Danny Hammond and I have never seen a legal foreclosure presented. I have never heard or read the Constitutional words required from the Foreclosing party to meet the minimum requirements of Standing.
So there cannot be a foreclosing party in a court trying to foreclose on you. I just tricked you. These Racketeers are tricking you too.
The problem is you.
The Borrower trying to fight against some fake servicer and prove he/she/it/ or whatever, is committing fraud against you is going to lose. Probably, very quickly.
You are trying to use your detective and judge reasoning skills that you learned on Perry Mason, or if you are younger, "Boston Legal".
You forget that Perry Mason wasn't real and the Boston Legal fake attorneys are so rich they don't need to be bribed. Those are extensions of the baking of your brain starting in 2nd grade.
All of this is making it harder and harder to help you guys. You are taking up so much time talking and not listening that you can't hear what we are saying. I am saying that I make a lot of money at my job, which I have not worked at for 5 years, because (I think) I hate bulllies. Are these foreclosing parties not bullies. You got to leavev me some time to work on my career and my family's home too. I have been letting my family down while trying to save yours. This I can do no longer.
I am not able to put my money into subsidizing Borrowers any longer. There is just too much wasted time.
I am going to have to charge more. If the cost is too much for victims to pay, that can no longer be the deciding factor.
All of this is making it harder and harder to help you guys. You are taking up so much time talking and not listening that you can't hear what we are saying. I am saying that I make a lot of money at my job, which I have not worked at for 5 years, because (I think) I hate bulllies. Are these foreclosing parties not bullies. You got to leavev me some time to work on my career and my family's home too. I have been letting my family down while trying to save yours. This I can do no longer.
I am not able to put my money into subsidizing Borrowers any longer. There is just too much wasted time.
I am going to have to charge more. If the cost is too much for victims to pay, that can no longer be the deciding factor.
I can't support the effort of winning if I can't at least break even. Half of you spent thousands of wasted money on attorneys who did not help you.
I spent a miserable 15 years learning how to help you if you will stop trying to tell me what you are doing right.
I have not been asked any question in the last 8 years that I didn't know the answer to. Listen to me. Or let me go work on my own home and try to put back together my family.
Language is pertinent in this effort just in the first few paragraphs of the Post. I may be wrong, for which I will take full credit, if it is judged by the American Psychologists Society (which I just made up) to be correct or a fool's errand.
This new tool I am using is either the most important single revelation in my 15 year search for the answer, or just another mirage that pisses me off.
I believe it will be proven to be my greatest weapon which can also be understood in relevant language and average understanding. This is very important.
Sorry, for the mid-explanation rant. It is like a tic I have developed since 2012.
In 2008 I would have told you, quietly and without attempting in any way to aggrandize myself, that I knew more about real estate and real estate deal "doing" than anyone I had ever met. That is still true.
I say that with pretended humility. However, I majored in women's beach volleyball, with a minor in staying out of Vietnam for 30 more days at a time and then repeating for another 30 days.
Language is pertinent in this effort just in the first few paragraphs of the Post. I may be wrong, for which I will take full credit, if it is judged by the American Psychologists Society (which I just made up) to be correct or a fool's errand.
This new tool I am using is either the most important single revelation in my 15 year search for the answer, or just another mirage that pisses me off.
I believe it will be proven to be my greatest weapon which can also be understood in relevant language and average understanding. This is very important.
Sorry, for the mid-explanation rant. It is like a tic I have developed since 2012.
In 2008 I would have told you, quietly and without attempting in any way to aggrandize myself, that I knew more about real estate and real estate deal "doing" than anyone I had ever met. That is still true.
I say that with pretended humility. However, I majored in women's beach volleyball, with a minor in staying out of Vietnam for 30 more days at a time and then repeating for another 30 days.
That minor was not particularly helpful. What I should have done was, minor in Crime.
My home had a loan payment which I "believed" I owed to GMAC Mortgage, LLC,.
My home had a loan payment which I "believed" I owed to GMAC Mortgage, LLC,.
Why did I believe it? Because I had received little coupons in the mail from GMAC Mortgage, LLC telling me to pay them.
I did; that was wrong. Here is a little secret. I owned the mortgage company that made me the loan. I now know that GMAC Mortgage, LLC was not registered to do any business in Missouri including in that "not any business" was banking and finance. I delivered the loan documents to Fed Ex. I PUT THE LOAN TOGEHER. It Was Criminaly Altered Later.
I believe the first article I wrote regarding Foreclosure Fraud was entitled "Little Coupons."
I believe the first article I wrote regarding Foreclosure Fraud was entitled "Little Coupons."
If it wasn't I will check my new website search function to verify.
If I didn't write it thouroughly then, I will write it again soon.
I have just posted or spoke in a video what is the 2nd most important event triggering the largest PONZI Scheme in the history of our Solar System. The first event was the 1999 repeal of the Glass-Steagall Finance Act of 1934.
Glass-Steagall coming to a website near you soon.
Glass-Steagall coming to a website near you soon.
Wednesday, October 28, 2026
I Have an Assignment of Mortgage (or Deed of Trust) Recorded Against My Home. Does Carpenter Carpenter vs Longan Forbid Assignment of A Mortgage or Deed of Trust?
They're leaving you nothin' and nowhere to go
Just put you in the corner like an old banjo
The strings are breakin' but you can't say no
You're runnin' with the devil and it's touch and go
The strings are breakin' but you can't say no
You're runnin' with the devil and it's touch and go
Emerson Lake and Powel (Running with the Devil)
No, Carpenter v. Longan does not forbid the assignment of a mortgage; rather, it establishes that the mortgage follows the note. The Supreme Court held that the note and mortgage are inseparable, with the note being the principal and the mortgage an accessory.
The Court ruled that an assignment of the note carries the mortgage with it, while an assignment of the mortgage alone is a nullity. Therefore, a recorded assignment of a mortgage is legally valid only if it is accompanied by the assignment of the underlying promissory note. If you hold the note, the mortgage automatically transfers to you as an incident of the debt, regardless of whether a separate mortgage assignment is recorded or not.
Wednesday, July 1, 2026
The Borrower Can Challenge The Assignments Of The Security Instruments [mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed etc.] Pursuant To The Rulings In "Slorp": The Full Case is Included Here
"Curse my eyes, the people I've seen,
Crawlin' through the wreck, of the American Dream"
"Holiday Ranch"
a Minneapolis Rock Band
"WHAT IF THE HANKY PANKY IS WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT?"
 by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press |
RICK A. SLORP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LERNER, SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; SHELLIE HILL; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Appellees.
ALL OF THE FORECLOSING PARTIES HAVE BEEN USING THE WORN OUT INTERPRETATION OF LAW, SAYING "THE BORROWERS CANNOT CHALLENGE ANY ASSIGNMENTS OF THE MORTGAGE". BUT, MORTGAGE FRAUD CHANGES ALL OF THAT ACCORDING TO THE SIXTH CIRCUIT APPEALS COURT IN "SLORP"!
The Imposter Foreclosing Party almost always claims that the Borrower (as the mortgagor) cannot challenge assignments. You did make your Promissory Note negotiable according to the terms of your Promissory Note that you allegedly signed. That is why the foreclosing parties use this interpretation.
But did the foreclosing party buy it legally? No almost assuredly it was never involved in a purchase and sale transaction which even involved any real purchase of your debt.
Learn the Hanky Panky with Danny Hammond - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
Thursday, June 25, 2026
What If Your Wrongful Foreclosure Was Already Void, But You Were Unaware Of This Fact?
What If Your Wrongful Foreclosure Was Already Void, But You Were Unaware Of This Fact?
There Is A Good Chance That Is True.
If you don't stick to your values when they're being tested, they're not values: they're hobbies.
Jon Stewart
04-21-2022
 |
| Find Danny Hammond mtgfrd.info@gmail.com |
I have just read a very long email from a borrower who was trying to tell me how he had proven over and over that the foreclosing party which does not exist, did not have the right to foreclose. He has been in court for years and suffered nearly unimaginable suffering and pain and costs.
But, I can imagine. I can remember trying to figure out the courts.
It shouldn't be that hard, should it? The courts seem crazy. But, what if Chuck's court is only incompetent? What if this judge is just a no-talent judge guy.
Monday, June 15, 2026
A Letter From One Who Was Uniquely Qualified To Point Out The Chronic and Permanent Deficiencies In Setting Up The Constitutional Judiciary
In The Constitution, It is stated that it is the citizens who must defend the Constitution
from defects, intentional changes, or when democracy is being threatened by those
in power and it becomes absolutely imperative.
It is singularly responsible for the foreclosure crisis today.
Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous;
that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and
irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only,
pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become
In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account.
The different Supreme Courts over decades and centuries have slowly created laws (which only Congress can do) covering the total ass of every judge by giving all judges (including their asses) Absolute Immunity.
No matter what intentional or unintentional unlawful every judge has Absolute Immunity from being sued by the Parties in court case. Again. Absolute Immunity if your house is taken in a crime in which a judge was a co-conspirator.
My strategy will still work, but it may be harder. My problem with this is that the Constitution is clear that no citizen can be raised higher than any other citizen. This is especially covered the 5th,11th, and 14th Amendments to the Constitution. These Common Law abominations are just made up by multiple Supreme Courts. They are inventions of convenience and not real laws. They didn't try to amend the constitution. They just buried all of the self-invented self interest changes in common law backwater.
They made law. They made every judge, not matter what he has done, untouchable and irresponsible for any act or crime they commit. They can't do that, so those changes they made to protect their asses, but not ours, are unconstitutional.
There is no change in any of the words of those Amendments in the Constitution. They changed constitutional law and buried these laws they made up which could only done following:
Only a majority vote in both houses in Congress and a vote of yes, by the citizens of 2/3 of the all of the states can amend the constitution. There were ten amendments added immediately which make up the original Bill of Civil Rights. This process makes changing the constitution so difficult that in 250 years there have been only 17 amendments since the enactment of the United States Constitution.
Today's King Robert's Supreme Court is the worst offender of all of the Supreme Court's over the entire 250 years of the Citizens created Judiciary.
Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press
The Letter From a United States Citizen Complaining About The Lack of Any Oversite of Judges Starts Below:
"With us all the branches of the government are elective by the people themselves, except
the Judiciary, of whose science and qualifications they are not competent judges."
that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and
irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only,
pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become
law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and
working its change by construction, before anyone has been busily employed in consuming its substance.
In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account.
Thomas Jefferson: letter to Monsieur A. Coray, Oct 31, 1823
Reach Us At This Email mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
Wednesday, June 10, 2026
From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: DIRTY DEEDS DONE DIRT CHEAP: All You Need To Know About That Servicer & Successor Trustee You Say is After You
FORECLOSURE FRAUD DEPENDS ON JUST A FEW PLAYERS TO BE SUCCESSFUL.
BUT THEY MUST BE CRIMINAL PLAYERS
THE MOST IMPORTANT IS THE
SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE AND HE/SHE/IT IS/ARE THE ONLY ONE YOU REALLY CAN SUE
THE SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE PERFORMED AN ILLEGAL ACT IN THE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE
A FORECLOSURE DEED WAS CREATED {FORGERY} THEN IT WAS RECORDED {WIRE FRAUD}
"Pick up the phone, I'm here alone, or you could make a social call
I'm always home. Call me at any time.
Just ring 362-436-####
I lead a life of crime!
I lead a life of crime!
Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!
Dirty Deeds and they're done dirt cheap!
AC DC
This article is dedicated to the six foreclosure mill law firms that were "appointed" to be Substitute Trustees" by fictitious Lenders to fraudulently foreclose on 14,400 families in Jackson County Missouri alone. For each year, for the last five years. Creating displaced refugee families at numbers rivaling anywhere in the world.
Jackson County is just one medium-sized county in the United States.
If you want me to name these firms in this blog and tell what I know about each one, then fill out the form below (you don't have to put your name or contact info) just let me know that you are pissed off.)
I hate the idea that I'm the only person in the world who is pissed off. That would mean I have a problem with reality.
Wednesday, June 3, 2026
Tenney's Win In The Judicial Foreclosure Kansas Appellate Court Case This was Danny Hammond's 1st Complete and Correct Win
“I was playing for time. Just for time.
I played the wrong way, of course.”
Humphrey Bogart as detective Phillip Marlowe
by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press
Case No. 110.359
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Trustee for THE Certificateholders of CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST INC., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007- AMC1, Appellee,
v.
DENNIS W. TENNEY and
BECKY TENNEY, et aI., Appellants the appellate court stated:
“Per
Curiam: “Dennis and Becky Tenney filed a motion to set aside an
agreed
judgment of mortgage foreclosure, claiming that the judgment was void. They argued that
U.S. Bank had not shown that it properly held the note secured by the mortgage therefore it was not the real party in interest, and it therefore lacked standing to sue.
judgment of mortgage foreclosure, claiming that the judgment was void. They argued that
U.S. Bank had not shown that it properly held the note secured by the mortgage therefore it was not the real party in interest, and it therefore lacked standing to sue.
The district court denied the motion, finding that it was
untimely. We disagree, because in Kansas lack of standing is
jurisdictional and can be raised at any time, and Kansas Law is in
lock step with Article III.
The district [Kansas state] court heard that motion the same day it was filed. The judge declined to take evidence, but it did hear arguments of counsel.
The greatest part of the hearing consisted of a colloquy between the district court and the Tenneys' new attorney. Counsel advised the district court that the Tenneys were claiming the judgment was void under Article III and Kansas UCC statute, stating: "I think the judgment is void if they're [U.S. Bank] not the proper party in interest."
The Tenneys' attorney maintained that the issue of whether a judgment was void for lack of standing could be raised at any time. The district court disagreed.
Continue Reading The First Face To Face and Correct Win For Me.
Find Danny Hammond - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
Let us know at this email: mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
Tuesday, June 2, 2026
LET'S ALL JUST TAKE THREE STEPS BACK FROM CRAZY! THAT IS RULE #1-- WHEN FIGHTING MORTGAGE FRAUD: Carpenter v Longan 1872; [Also On YouTube Channel] @mtgfrd
Heirs of a cold war, that's what we've become, Inheriting troubles, I'm mentally numb
Crazy,..... I just cannot bear, That I'm living with something that just isn't fair,
Mental wounds not healing.....Who and what's to blame
I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train, I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train
Ozzy OsborneTHERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE: "ASSIGNMENT OF YOUR MORTGAGE",
EVEN THOUGH IT HAS BEEN USED ILLEGALLY 30 MILLION TIMES IN 22 YEARS
The Supreme Court settled the matter of assigning a mortgage or deed of trust in 1872. You can't assign those instruments. The case is CARPENTER V LONGAN AND THE CASE IS IN THIS ARTICLE JUST BELOW.
Find out why any assignment of the security agreement is void. Keep reading.
Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press
I have reviewed hundreds, possibly thousands of home loan paperwork preceding a fraudulent foreclosure. I have read about many more. I have never seen any deal where the foreclosing party was not relying on an assignment of the security instrument.
IN THE 26 STATES THAT USE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE THE MORTGAGE IS CALLED A DEED OF TRUST. THE WORD MORTGAGE IS RARELY SPOKEN IN THESE STATES.
In Judicial foreclosure states, the assignment of the security instrument involves what is called a mortgage. A mortgage is not a home loan. It is merely the rule book concerning the collateral you put up to ensure that the bank will be paid back.
A mortgage has no value and the assignment of a mortgage does NOT transfer your home loan from one party to another. In the Non-Judicial States, the security instrument is called a Deed of Trust which serves the same purpose as a mortgage. There is no such thing as "the assignment of a mortgage or a deed of trust. The mortgage or deed of trust exists only as part of the loan agreement and it is incidental. The security instrument is known as the incidental instrument (there are no laws that require collateral for a loan at all.)
Your house is the usual collateral involving a home loan because that is where the loan money was spent. But, collateral could also consist of one thousand Schwinn bicycles in a warehouse. It is my strong personal belief that all (ALL) of the foreclosures in the United States from about the year 2000, or earlier, are based on the exact (EXACT) same lie. What is that lie?
CARPENTER V LONGAN (SUPREME COURT 1872) THE ENTIRE RULING IS NEXT
IN THE 26 STATES THAT USE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE THE MORTGAGE IS CALLED A DEED OF TRUST. THE WORD MORTGAGE IS RARELY SPOKEN IN THESE STATES.
In Judicial foreclosure states, the assignment of the security instrument involves what is called a mortgage. A mortgage is not a home loan. It is merely the rule book concerning the collateral you put up to ensure that the bank will be paid back.
A mortgage has no value and the assignment of a mortgage does NOT transfer your home loan from one party to another. In the Non-Judicial States, the security instrument is called a Deed of Trust which serves the same purpose as a mortgage. There is no such thing as "the assignment of a mortgage or a deed of trust. The mortgage or deed of trust exists only as part of the loan agreement and it is incidental. The security instrument is known as the incidental instrument (there are no laws that require collateral for a loan at all.)
Your house is the usual collateral involving a home loan because that is where the loan money was spent. But, collateral could also consist of one thousand Schwinn bicycles in a warehouse. It is my strong personal belief that all (ALL) of the foreclosures in the United States from about the year 2000, or earlier, are based on the exact (EXACT) same lie. What is that lie?
CARPENTER V LONGAN (SUPREME COURT 1872) THE ENTIRE RULING IS NEXT
For questions, comments or clowning around with Danny Hammond - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
Saturday, May 30, 2026
Circuses Face Serious Labor Shortages As More Clowns Continue To Stream Into D.C.
For questions, comments or clowning around with Danny Hammond - mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press
In Other News:
by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)