So, Fraud is a fact and the "burden of proof" of the Foreclosing Parties is to prove with "concrete and particularized evidence" that they are not committing fraud and that instead, they are the legitimate owner of the loan and that they paid money in a documented transaction to purchase the loan. I have never seen in any foreclosure sale or foreclosure case the written words of the Foreclosing Party claiming and proving anything at all. But, it is not for us to argue this with and against the Foreclosing Party. The judge is the only person controlling his courtroom. It is he that must review the words of the Foreclosing Party and then file into court his reasoning of finding that the Foreclosing Party has met the constitutional, irreducible, minimum requirements of Standing...or not. No fraudulent Imposter or Fictitious Payee Foreclosing Party can cheat at this. But, judges can ignore their duty and assist the scheme. Your judge has most assuredly done this.
Not at the beginning of a case where the Imposters and Fictitious Payees (real legal terms) are trying to take the most expensive and most precious item that any American can ever own. The false foreclosing parties are trying to take this thing away from someone is who is in legal possession of the thing. Homes. They are taking homes. I have never seen them doing it legally. But, in the end, this is the responsibility of the judge. It is his job to keep the proceedings from "running amuck"! (It is time that we made the term running amuck a truly legal phrase.)
