"WHAT IF THE HANKY PANKY IS WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT?"
A bumper sticker
A mortgage (the same thing as a Deed of Trust) is no more than the rule book for the agreement between the lender and the Borrrer of what happens if a Borrower can or cannot pay back his loan. The presence of fraud isn't the burden of the Borrower to prove in court. That is the constitutional duty of the judge. The judges are betraying their oath to protect the constitution and the "public perception of the nation's courts" on a massive scale.
 |
| by Danny Hammond mtgfrd.info@gmail.com |
MORTGAGE: Defined as-- "mortgage [a conditional conveyance of property as security for the repayment of a loan]" Proper term is "Security Instrument"
FRAUD: Defined as-- an intentional misrepresentation of material existing fact made by one person to another with knowledge of its falsity and for the purpose of inducing the other person to act, and upon which the other person relies with resulting injury or damage.
FRAUD: Defined as-- an intentional misrepresentation of material existing fact made by one person to another with knowledge of its falsity and for the purpose of inducing the other person to act, and upon which the other person relies with resulting injury or damage.
Foreclosing Parties have to prove with concrete and particularized evidence that they are acting legally at the beginning of a case they begin because they are wanting to take something away from someone is who is in possession of the thing. In other words, the Foreclosing Party must prove that they are, in fact, not committing fraud. The Borrower is being made to "prove" fraud, by judges is a violation of the constitution, a very grave and wrongful act for a judge.
