Read More:
In that one moment, she had changed everything. We now had a judge committing a criminal act.
Bam! I was thunderstruck. This is the only simple and clear act a judge can commit for which they have no immunity from criminal prosecution. Even better, it is against Constitutional Law to deprive a citizen of his or her civil rights. We can't bring criminal cases.
We can bring civil cases based on actual injury a judge causes us to suffer. Here we are talking about the right of Due Process as defined by the 5th and the 14th amendment. There is no question of if, your right to Due Process has been deprived by your judge. Deprivation of the civil right to Due Process. If the judge simply cannot deprive you of your right, then he must not have been a judge when he did it. (and this is so).
Well he wasn't. He was a citizen, no higher or lower than you. He was for that moment an imposter.
Once I headed in the pro se direction I next had her tell me that a seasoned attorney has learned to restrain from shot gunning messages at the judge.
She told me that if you have 10 issues of wrong doing on the part of the your opposing party you should use 3 or 4.
If you have 6 issues, use 3 or 4.
If you have 4 issues use 3 or 4.
I quit for two years when I realized that Borrowers were being treated differently and that Standing and Subject Matter Jurisdiction were being ignored completely.
Since Standing is the Constitutional basis for even bringing a case before the court, we were going to have to force judges to realize that they had sworn a sacred oath to defend the constitution.
But this criminal act is always present and it is the responsibility for a judge in every civil trial. It was instantly apparent to me that out of the 2000 or more cases I had reviewed, the judge had committed this crime. I have still have never see a judge review a case for Standing and then write up his reasoning and file it into the case. Not one time.
Accepting that nothing is like what I have seen going on around the courts has really helped me stay on track. I have cut back on the shot gun approach and now it is just a few accurate issues that I don't see how to come off of. They are absolute.
I see three that are fatal to the defendants.
1 No claim of Injury in fact. No Concrete and Particulized evidence of any Injury which of course they couldn't have presented evidence if they didn't claim Injury.
2. If you have Challenged Standing and Subject Matter Jurisdiction because there can be no Standing without a claim of Injury then your case is void. Either Party or the court may may Challenge Standing at ANY time.
3. Unjust Enrichment. The Defendant has claimed to have purchased your house and US Bank has claimed that you did not pay for your loan as directed in your contract which is the Promissory Note.
The Defendant US Bank has not presented the original Promissory Note with all endorsements signed and notarized.
Nor has the Defendant US Bank even mentioned a Promissory Note.
The debt is the thing. If time has gone by and if any payments have been made the balance of the debt will have changed.
In your case the Promissory Note might have been signed and granted by the Plaintiffs to the Mortgage Company which put their deal together and the Plaintiffs were present and they were informed that Happy Crook Mortgage was the named Lender. A closing took place on ____2006.
This loan was perfected 18 years ago. It is not logical to believe that the Plaintiffs never made any payments in 18 years.
Yet, the Defendant is purported to have sold the home to the Defendant Real Estate Legal Purchases, LLC , which, one would surmise, paid cash to whoever acted as the auctioneer.
There is nothing new to learn, and certinly in time.
I am not sure why you do not understand that.
You sent me a text to tell that you might have some ideas. That was a time to tell me what was on your mind.
I was at my desk all day. It takes you a week to take a step.
The Promissory Note is the most important thing you don't have. I told you that 2nd time we talked. You have never grasped why, do you even know what it might look like?
I address it by telling the court the foreclosing party has the burden of addressing it, not me. That is the basis of Caspenter v Longan. A U.S. Supreme Court Ruling from 1872 Colorado territories that was partially about wheat as a currency. I just said it that way to get your attention. It was not completely wrong though.
I don't think you have read, and more importantly, understood the Motion and Memorandum I sent you.
Those writings are completely comprehensive.
I don't think you have read more than one or two of the articles I sent you from my website.
The one that would have helped you the most is about the case where a KC state judge ordered Hudson City Savings to let go of a my pro se clients' $600,000 house and awarded $2.5 million in punative damages by the legal formulas judges must use to levy damages by law. Not by a whim they have.
That was in 2016, I think.
Those clients called me in desperation after looking at my website 5 years earlier (2011) They had been foreclosed and were facing eviction within 2 days.
I stopped the eviction and they paid me $900 a month for 6 years and they never left the house. They never paid another one of their $3,100 payment.
They were saving $2200 a month.
