The Answer was the Bill of Rights, the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. Much better to work with and the result was The Doctrine of Cases and Controversies and the impossible to circumvent STANDING to even bring a case to be filed by the clerk of the court.
There have been only 27 amendments to the Constitution which went into effect before 1800 due to the 2/3 or 66% of all states voting "Yea".
The rest of every person's identical Civil Rights are numbered in order and have been permanently added to the Constitution as Amendments.
1. BURDEN OF PROOF IN EVERY FORECLOSURE CASE: That is the basis of what I want you to understand. I have had two breakthroughs since I was attacked by the horde known as the Federal National Mortgage Association (often abbreviated as FNMA). Created in 1938, it is a government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) that provides liquidity to the mortgage market by purchasing, guaranteeing, and securitizing mortgages to make homeownership more accessible.
All laws and statute both state and Federal are still sitting where they were but getting very dusty since the repeal of the Glass-Steagal Act of 1934. Most were written a long time ago. For me a long time ago means everything before 1999 by men and to a lesser degree women.
These people had never heard of the internet. Many had never ridden in a car or even traveled about on paved roads.
There has always been a percentage of people who were corrupt, greedy, and had no interest in doing the right thing, but nothing in history can come close to today. I blame the internet, the very technology I am typing this "article" on.
After 2005-2008 there is little research that can be done to teach you how to win, especially because your mindset limits you to seeing only that your foreclosure problem must be stopped by making those who are trying to foreclose on you stop. This is fraud and you are trying to convince the judge you are being defrauded. You may have figured out that many judges are crooked, but you think there is some good in him and that you must prove fraud by suing the Servicer, Trustee, Foreclosing Party, Etc., Etc, Etc.
In law, this is not your burden. It has never been your burden. It will never be your burden.
It is the burden of the foreclosing party to prove with "concrete and particularized" evidence that he, she, it, they, them own your Promissory Note which is the contract between you and a lender.
The Foreclosing Party must demonstrate this ownership is legal and it must prove this BEFORE a case against you can even begin.
The foreclosing party must prove this ownership of your debt by meeting the "Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements of Standing." The Foreclosing Party must do this in its Complaint in a Judicial Foreclosure case or in a Non-judicial foreclosure in its Answer before the case can become a case.
Of course, this is not happening. Since 2002 nothing has been done correctly. But, I want you to know that I have seen an awful lot of cases and I have never seen any attempt by any Foreclosing Party to meet the minimum requirements for standing. It should start with "we have suffered an Injury and we have included in this filing, our concrete and particularized evidence that the injury is real and that we can "fairly trace" the causation of our Injury to the actions of the Borrower.
The judge must review the writings of the alleged Foreclosing Party for those words. If he does not then the case against you must be dismissed.
When the government and the judiciary cannot be trusted, researching the legal answer is pretty easy to describe and scope. If a court (judge) has been promised cash, gold and a boat and he must decide against you to get those things, he is going to Rule against you and it won't matter what you file. Let's say you file a Motion to Dismiss the Case and the judge has 30 days to rule something? He is going to simply ignore your motion. He can't address it in writing or by speaking about it.
How can he do that? There is no one for you to tell on him to. Tom Kibler proved this with the most amazing amount of letters, emails, phone calls, to everyone that might be in charge of something. Including Minnesota's Attorney General. He has inundated the Sheriff's office which was the auctioneer who sold his home. He has tried to contact the CFPB. This is all ten years ago.
Today he is working with a large number of truly smart people in more than one group. They are trying to change the system from within. They are now much more sophisticated and cagey. They have been to Washington D.C. and they are getting meetings. They met with DOGE the agency thought up by Trump and Elon Musk and made everyone in the US mad because they got maybe all of our information possessed by the IRS. How are you going to protest?
Tom and the rest are working on it. We collaborate on everything several times a week. If either group makes a truly giant breakthrough, we all will join together. Right now I am trying to save houses from Pirates and Robbers.
(Maxim: Even when held hostage by Pirates and Robbers their ownership does not change)
Most of you have many good laws ready to put into your Complaint to prove fraud.
Those laws are on the shelf, but they are very dusty.
Question. Is a law, a law, when it is not enforced?
Now, if you hang around losing and making "notes to self" long enough, you will figure out if any laws work or not.
The Constitution:
1.) The Burden Of Truth: Since 2010 everyone I have talked to has been trying to prove to a court that they have been, or still are, being defrauded. I started out the same way. We were not attorneys who worked in the same court every day with all the same judges and having relationships with those judges for years. The framers of the constitution knew much more about human nature than we do. They could see the future. They did not see this. They also left room for changes that they didn't try to imagine, but they left methods for a majority of good Americans (66%) in all of the states to make changes if absolutely needed.
They said in the constitution that everyone had civil rights that could not be violated. (Thus, the often stated but inaccurate "judges have some leeway," No, they don't.
Even these brilliant men had not written down or thought through those civil rights. The first Supreme Court (called "The Court") had its first melt down before the ink dried on the Constitutional Signatures.
It seems many people decided that they should avail themselves of those rights in court. They wanted to know what the civil rights actually were. And the court had to go to Congress with the logical questions "What are our civil rights when addressed in court?" (Three Stooges slap to the head)
The Answer was the Bill of Rights, the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. Much better to work with and the result was The Doctrine of Cases and Controversies. There have been only 27 amendments to the Constitution. 27 changes since 1787, 250 years. Ten went into effect before 1800 due to the 2/3 or 66% of all states rule.
Their burden is to prove that they have a right to collect money from you according to the terms in the contract using the strictest evidence available. The contract is the Promissory Note. They don't have it. So they have to make something up. They have been using the same stupid strategy since 2001.
They claim that your remaining debt was transferred from one ridiculous party to another with the assignment of your Security Instrument (mortgage or deed of trust.) Sometimes the one Security Instrument has been transferred from one racketeer to some other racketeer multiple times This has worked for 26 years.
Your Foreclosing Party has not met the minimum requirements. Your case is void. STOP protesting or accusing using the things that happened within a case that was Void Ab Initio. It was Void when written.
It did not exist yesterday. It does not exist today. It will not exist tomorrow. It does not exist at all.
The Answer was the Bill of Rights, the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. Much better to work with and the result was The Doctrine of Cases and Controversies and the impossible to circumvent STANDING to even bring a case to be filed by the clerk of the court.
There have been only 27 amendments to the Constitution which went into effect before 1800 due to the 2/3 or 66% of all states voting "Yea".
The rest of every person's identical Civil Rights are numbered in order and have been permanently added to the Constitution as Amendments.
1. BURDEN OF PROOF IN EVERY FORECLOSURE CASE: That is the basis of what I want you to understand. I have had two breakthroughs since I was attacked by the horde known as the Federal National Mortgage Association (often abbreviated as FNMA). Created in 1938, it is a government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) that provides liquidity to the mortgage market by purchasing, guaranteeing, and securitizing mortgages to make homeownership more accessible.
All laws and statute both state and Federal are still sitting where they were but getting very dusty since the repeal of the Glass-Steagal Act of 1934. Most were written a long time ago. For me a long time ago means everything before 1999 by men and to a lesser degree women.
These people had never heard of the internet. Many had never ridden in a car or even traveled about on paved roads.
There has always been a percentage of people who were corrupt, greedy, and had no interest in doing the right thing, but nothing in history can come close to today. I blame the internet, the very technology I am typing this "article" on.
After 2005-2008 there is little research that can be done to teach you how to win, especially because your mindset limits you to seeing only that your foreclosure problem must be stopped by making those who are trying to foreclose on you stop. This is fraud and you are trying to convince the judge you are being defrauded. You may have figured out that many judges are crooked, but you think there is some good in him and that you must prove fraud by suing the Servicer, Trustee, Foreclosing Party, Etc., Etc, Etc.
In law, this is not your burden. It has never been your burden. It will never be your burden.
It is the burden of the foreclosing party to prove with "concrete and particularized" evidence that he, she, it, they, them own your Promissory Note which is the contract between you and a lender.
The Foreclosing Party must demonstrate this ownership is legal and it must prove this BEFORE a case against you can even begin.
The foreclosing party must prove this ownership of your debt by meeting the "Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements of Standing." The Foreclosing Party must do this in its Complaint in a Judicial Foreclosure case or in a Non-judicial foreclosure in its Answer before the case can become a case.
Of course, this is not happening. Since 2002 nothing has been done correctly. But, I want you to know that I have seen an awful lot of cases and I have never seen any attempt by any Foreclosing Party to meet the minimum requirements for standing. It should start with "we have suffered an Injury and we have included in this filing, our concrete and particularized evidence that the injury is real and that we can "fairly trace" the causation of our Injury to the actions of the Borrower.
The judge must review the writings of the alleged Foreclosing Party for those words. If he does not then the case against you must be dismissed.
When the government and the judiciary cannot be trusted, researching the legal answer is pretty easy to describe and scope. If a court (judge) has been promised cash, gold and a boat and he must decide against you to get those things, he is going to Rule against you and it won't matter what you file. Let's say you file a Motion to Dismiss the Case and the judge has 30 days to rule something? He is going to simply ignore your motion. He can't address it in writing or by speaking about it.
How can he do that? There is no one for you to tell on him to. Tom Kibler proved this with the most amazing amount of letters, emails, phone calls, to everyone that might be in charge of something. Including Minnesota's Attorney General. He has inundated the Sheriff's office which was the auctioneer who sold his home. He has tried to contact the CFPB. This is all ten years ago.
Today he is working with a large number of truly smart people in more than one group. They are trying to change the system from within. They are now much more sophisticated and cagey. They have been to Washington D.C. and they are getting meetings. They met with DOGE the agency thought up by Trump and Elon Musk and made everyone in the US mad because they got maybe all of our information possessed by the IRS. How are you going to protest?
Tom and the rest are working on it. We collaborate on everything several times a week. If either group makes a truly giant breakthrough, we all will join together. Right now I am trying to save houses from Pirates and Robbers.
(Maxim: Even when held hostage by Pirates and Robbers their ownership does not change)
Most of you have many good laws ready to put into your Complaint to prove fraud.
Those laws are on the shelf, but they are very dusty.
Question. Is a law, a law, when it is not enforced?
Now, if you hang around losing and making "notes to self" long enough, you will figure out if any laws work or not.
The Constitution:
1.) The Burden Of Truth: Since 2010 everyone I have talked to has been trying to prove to a court that they have been, or still are, being defrauded. I started out the same way. We were not attorneys who worked in the same court every day with all the same judges and having relationships with those judges for years. The framers of the constitution knew much more about human nature than we do. They could see the future. They did not see this. They also left room for changes that they didn't try to imagine, but they left methods for a majority of good Americans (66%) in all of the states to make changes if absolutely needed.
They said in the constitution that everyone had civil rights that could not be violated. (Thus, the often stated but inaccurate "judges have some leeway," No, they don't.
Even these brilliant men had not written down or thought through those civil rights. The first Supreme Court (called "The Court") had its first melt down before the ink dried on the Constitutional Signatures.
It seems many people decided that they should avail themselves of those rights in court. They wanted to know what the civil rights actually were. And the court had to go to Congress with the logical questions "What are our civil rights when addressed in court?" (Three Stooges slap to the head)
The Answer was the Bill of Rights, the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. Much better to work with and the result was The Doctrine of Cases and Controversies. There have been only 27 amendments to the Constitution. 27 changes since 1787, 250 years. Ten went into effect before 1800 due to the 2/3 or 66% of all states rule.
Their burden is to prove that they have a right to collect money from you according to the terms in the contract using the strictest evidence available. The contract is the Promissory Note. They don't have it. So they have to make something up. They have been using the same stupid strategy since 2001.
They claim that your remaining debt was transferred from one ridiculous party to another with the assignment of your Security Instrument (mortgage or deed of trust.) Sometimes the one Security Instrument has been transferred from one racketeer to some other racketeer multiple times This has worked for 26 years.
Your Foreclosing Party has not met the minimum requirements. Your case is void. STOP protesting or accusing using the things that happened within a case that was Void Ab Initio. It was Void when written.
It did not exist yesterday. It does not exist today. It will not exist tomorrow. It does not exist at all.
The Answer was the Bill of Rights, the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. Much better to work with and the result was The Doctrine of Cases and Controversies and the impossible to circumvent STANDING to even bring a case to be filed by the clerk of the court.
