"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." "Since when do you have to agree with people to defend them from injustice?" "If it were not for injustice, man would not know justice." "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
Mark Twain
by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press
A very good way to show the "too complicated" I have been talking about. Is the dreadful lack of wins in court when the Borrower is trying to use statute and law against mostly nonexistent or organized racketeer entities pushing their limited, wrong, and mostly "made up" strategies that cannot possibly win without the interference and facilitating of a judge.
I see a lot of wrong rulings now, that seem to be reasoned out, unless you read very carefully.
In the beginning of the Wall Street Meltdown my judges just didn't recognize that I had even filed anything. Then ruled Denied or Granted without explanation. The law gave them 30 days to answer my motions or other filings. I mean to tell you, they never acknowledged anything I wrote.
All laws and statute both state and Federal are still where they were before. They have not been stolen or destroyed. Most were written a long time ago. For me a long time ago means everything written before 1999. Things made sense before then.
Our laws are for the most part simple and logical. The authors of the Constitution, Federal Law, and state law would never know of the internet. They never dreamed of air travel. None of them ever got to ride in a car or even travel about on paved roads. They were not as distracted as we are, so they had the time and the schooling to make simple logical law.
There has always been and there will always be a percentage of people who are corrupt, greedy, and have no interest in doing the right thing.
But nothing in history can come close to the hell we are living with today. I blame the internet, the very technology I am typing this "article" on.
After 2004-2008 there is little research that you can do that will be effective in saving your home. This is because the laws that should work, don't. "Is a law, a law, if it is not enforced.
When your government along with the judiciary cannot be trusted, researching for the legal answers and protections you are looking for is pretty easy to describe and scope.
If a court (judge) has been promised cash, gold and a boat, and he must "rule" against you to get those things, he is going to rule against you.
The laws are still on shelves, in libraries and even on the internet. They are untouched. It is easy for you to have the expectation that you can use them in your wrongful foreclosure case and that they will help you prove fraud against everyone involved.
But, if you hang around losing and making "notes to self" long enough, you will figure out which laws won't work and narrow down your choices of which laws will work.
The Burden Of Proof: Since 2010 everyone I have talked to has been trying to prove to a court that they have been, or still are, being defrauded. I started out the same way. We were not attorneys who worked in the same court every day with all the same judges and having relationships with those judges for years.
The framers of the constitution knew much more about human nature than we do. They could see the future. They did not see this coming. That the judiciary would rule against law if they were offered enough incentive.
But they did guess that things would go wrong. They left room for changes that they didn't try to imagine. They gave us methods and remedies to correct changes for the worse.
For instance, the constitution states in one sentence that everyone had civil rights that could never be violated. (Thus, the often stated heresay that "judges have some leeway" is inaccurate. Because, no, they don't.)
They had some rough spots in the very beginning of the Judiciary. These brilliant men had not written down or thought through those civil rights. The first Supreme Court (called "The Court") had its first melt down before the ink dried on the Constitutional Signatures.
It seems many people decided that they should avail themselves of those civil rights in court. The court had to go to Congress with a very logical question about the ensuing logjam. You have said that we have rights, but the people are asking us if their civil rights in various ways have been violated. So, Mr. Congress just "What are our civil rights when addressed by a court?" (Three Stooges slap to the head)
READ More Here: Don't Believe That ALL of What You Need Know Was In The Beginning. Read it all.
