"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." "Since when do you have to agree with people to defend them from injustice?" "If it were not for injustice, man would not know justice." "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
Mark Twain
by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press
That was a very good way to show me the "too complicated" I was talking about.
All laws and statute both state and Federal are still where they were. Most were written a long time ago. For me a long time ago means everything before 1999 by men and to a lesser degree women.
These people, as adults, had never heard of the internet. They never did. None of them ever got to ride in a car or even travel about on paved roads.
There has always been and there will always be a percentage of people who were corrupt, greedy, and had no interest in doing the right thing.
But nothing in history can come close to what we are living with today. I blame the internet, the very technology I am typing this "letter" on.
After 2005-2008 there is little research that can be done.
When the government and the judiciary cannot be trusted, researching the legal answer is pretty easy to describe and scope. If a court (judge) has been promised cash, gold and a boat, and he must decide against you to get those things, he is going to. The laws are on the shelf, but they are very dusty.
But, if you hang around losing and making "notes to self" long enough, you will figure out if any laws work or not.
1.) The Burden Of Truth: Since 2010 everyone I have talked to has been trying to prove to a court that they have been, or still are, being defrauded. I started out the same way. We were not attorneys who worked in the same court every day with all the same judges and having relationships with those judges for years. The framers of the constitution knew much more about human nature than we do. They could see the future. They did not see this. They also left room for changes that they didn't try to imagine, but they left methods for a majority of good Americans (66%) in all of the states to make changes if absolutely needed.
They said in the constitution that everyone had civil rights that could not be violated. (Thus, the often stated "judges have some leeway" is inaccurate. No, they don't.)
These brilliant men had not written down or thought through those civil rights. The first Supreme Court (called "The Court") had its first melt down before the ink dried on the Constitutional Signatures.
It seems many people decided that they should avail themselves of those civil rights in court and the court had to go to Congress with the logical question, You have said that we have rights, but people are asking us if their civil rights have been violated. So, Mr. Congress just "What are our civil rights when addressed in court?" (Three Stooges slap to the head)
READ More Here: Don't Believe That ALL of What You Need Know Was In The Beginning. Read it all.
