A Letter From One Who Was Uniquely Qualified To Point Out The Chronic and Permanent Deficiencies In Setting Up The Constitutional Judiciary

In The Constitution, It is stated that it is the citizens who must defend the 

Constitution from defects or intentional changes when it is absolutely 

imperative.

Below is a letter considering whether the founders had made a grave error in establishing the parity of the 3 branches of government.  It is a fundamental problem today.

It is singularly responsible for the foreclosure crisis today.

The different Supreme Courts over decades and centuries have slowly created laws (which only Congress can do) covering the total ass of every judge by giving all judges (including their asses) Absolute Immunity. 

No matter what intentional or unintentional unlawful every judge has Absolute Immunity from being sued by the Parties in court case. Again. Absolute Immunity if your house is taken in a crime in which a judge was a co-conspirator.  My strategy will still work, but it may be harder.  My problem with this is that the Constitution is clear that no citizen can be raised higher than any other citizen.  This is especially covered the 5th,11th, and 14th Amendments to the Constitution.  These Common Law abominations are just made up by multiple Supreme Courts.  They are inventions of convenience and not real laws.  They  didn't try to amend the constitution.  They just buried all of the self-invented self interest changes in common law backwater.

They made law.  They made every judge, not matter what he has done, untouchable and irresponsible for any act or crime they commit.  They can't do that, so those changes they made to protect their asses, but not ours, are unconstitutional.

There is no change in any of the words of those Amendments in the Constitution.  They changed constitutional law and buried these laws they made up which could only done following:

Only a majority vote in both houses in Congress and a vote of yes, by the citizens of 2/3 of the all of the states can amend the constitution.  There were ten amendments added immediately which make up the original Bill of Civil Rights.  This process makes changing the constitution so difficult that in 250 years there have been only 17 amendments since the enactment of the United States Constitution.

Today's King Robert's Supreme Court is the worst offender of all of the Supreme Court's over the entire 250 years of the Citizens created Judiciary.

Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

The Letter From a United States Citizen Complaining About The Lack of Any Oversite of Judges Starts Below:

"With us all the branches of the government are elective by the people themselves, except 

the Judiciary, of whose science and qualifications they are not competent judges." 

Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous;
that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and
irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only,
pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become 

law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and 

working its change by construction, before anyone has been busily employed in consuming its substance.

In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account.

             

Thomas Jefferson: letter to Monsieur A. Coray, Oct 31, 1823

Adamantios Coray (also spelled Koraes) did respond to Jefferson, though 
The exchange was limited due to Jefferson's death shortly after their final
letter.

Coray's Follow-Up Letter (January 30, 1825)

Coray sent a letter dated January 30, 1825, which Jefferson received
shortly before his death on July 4, 1826. In this response: Acknowledgment 

of Advice: Coray explicitly stated that in his new publication of Plutarch’s

political pamphlets, he had "not failed to take advantage of your advice" 

regarding the formation of a government.

Political Urging: He urged the United States to officially recognize Greek
independence sooner rather than later, warning that Great Britain would
otherwise be the first to do so and gain undue influence
over the new nation.

Anonymity: Interestingly, Coray requested that this specific letter be
treated as anonymous, likely to protect himself or the Greek cause
from diplomatic repercussions while pressing for official U.S. action.

Limitations of the Exchange

No Further Reply: There is no record of Jefferson replying to this 1825 letter.
Jefferson was in declining health and died less than two years later.

Silence on Trade: While Coray had originally requested U.S. trade
representative

In his 1823 letter, Jefferson had remained silent on that specific point in his 

1823 response, adhering strictly to the U.S. policy of non-entanglement in

European conflicts.

Coray’s 1825 letter attempted to revisit the need for a formal relationship 

but could not elicit a further response.