Saturday, April 23, 2022

From "The Pro Se Series by Danny Hammond: THE IMPORTANCE OF CHALLENGING THE CONSTITUTIONAL STANDING TO FORECLOSE CONCERNING YOUR FRAUDULENT LENDER AND THE "SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION" OF THE COURT. THIS IS EXACTLY THE SAME IN BOTH JUDICIAL AND NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURES AND STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS

“Until you guys own your own souls you don't own mine. Until you guys can be trusted every time and always, in all times and conditions, to seek the truth out and find it and let the chips fall where they may—until that time comes, I have the right to listen to my conscience and protect my client the best way I can. Until I'm sure you won't do him more harm than you'll do the truth good. Or until I'm hauled before somebody that can make me talk."      Raymond Chandler "High Window"

Republished by Danny Hammond


IF YOU ONLY RETAIN THREE WORDS FROM THIS POST YOU WILL NOT HAVE WASTED YOUR TIME.


THE WORDS ARE:  "INJURY IN FACT"



Article III of the Constitution of the United States as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court has long ago established a constitutional, irreducible, minimum set of requirements for a party in a genuine dispute to establish that it has the Standing to redress a claimed "Injury In Fact" before it can bring a dispute before any court.

Without the existence of Standing all courts in the land must acknowledge that the court has no subject matter jurisdiction to hear any merits of a case and that it has no choice whatsoever but to dismiss the subject action.

In Borrower's cases, this subject action is the claim that the foreclosing party is the party in interest that has the "right" to foreclose on a Borrower's property and that it is claiming and proving that it has been injured by the Borrower enabling its right to foreclose.
The three requirements to prove Standing in a case involving Judicial Foreclosure state foreclosure actions in which the foreclosing party is the Plaintiff and the Borrower is the defendant.


at
Labels: , , , , , , , ,