What If Your Wrongful Foreclosure Was Already Void, But You Were Unaware Of This Fact?

If you don't stick to your values when they're being tested, they're not values: they're hobbies.

               Jon Stewart

Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 court press

04-21-2022

I have just read a very long email from a borrower who was trying to tell me how he had proven over and over that the foreclosing party which does not exist, did not have the right to foreclose. He has been in court for years and suffered nearly unimaginable suffering and pain and costs.

But, I can imagine. I can remember. Trying to figure out the courts

shouldn't be that hard, should it? The court seems crazy. But, what if Chuck's court is only incompetent? What if this judge is just a no-talent judge guy.

This judge won't learn anything because the other judge guys will protect him from the Borrower. He will protect his other judge guys also, so.....they won't learn anything either. That's how judges go. They are Knuckleheads. They all used to be attorney guys.

I know this is true. After years of working it out, I know that the majority of judges in these mortgage fraud cases are hopelessly devoid of knowledge of, or experience with, real estate chains of title or real estate law, or finance.

When I reply to him I know what I will say. It has been going around in my head like a song for a year. It will go something like this:

CONTINUE READING

Comment at:  mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

You are reading this article on the Foreclosure Solutions Group website. Go to the website CLICK THIS LINE

The Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements of Article III Standing As Defined By the The United States Supreme Court- From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: Foreclosure Fraud Primer 101 #4

“All power is originally vested in, and consequently derived from, the people.”

The United States Constitution

by Danny Hammond  mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

The judge promised when he took the job that he, or she, would enforce and protect the laws that come from the constitution and that they would defend the court ferociously from losing the public trust in the integrity of the court.

Maybe that was too much to ask from some pompous asses. Why did we all expect more of judges and attorneys anyway? If I am any part of the public, then I can tell you for sure, the courts have already lost some of MY public trust.

It is difficult for me to pull Borrowers back from their searches for Promissory Notes, and the Assignments of Mortgage, MERS, PSA, etc., etc., thinking like Dick Tracy and Perry Mason, as well as Captain Kirk looking for a way to "prove" that the party trying to foreclose on them does not have the authority, or, STANDING, to do so.

But, if what I say is true and the judges are letting the attorneys run amuck like the 2nd graders in my description, who can blame the attorneys for running amuck. "Amuck" is quickly becoming synonymous with the "actions of the courts" to me.

If you had seen judges simply ignore proof when it is presented as much as I have, then what I am now really trying to say is that this whole thing is only about Standing and nothing else. The initial burden of determining if the foreclosing party is a party with Standing is the review of the concrete and particularized evidence and the review of that evidence and the burden of proof is on the foreclosing party and the review of this "concrete and particularized" proof is the very foundation of law and it is the judge who must find Standing of the Foreclosing Party or refuse to take the case. The burden of investigating the "story" of the foreclosing is NOT ON THE BORROWER. 

CONTINUE READING

Fraudulent Foreclosure and the Danny Hammond MIKE SINGLETARY Offense For Borrowers Facing Fraudulent Foreclosure

“There is only one way to succeed in anything and that is to give it everything.”

                                                                             Vince Lombardi

Reposted because it is the 3rd most popular article out of 271 articles still posted

by Danny Hammond

mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

The theory behind my "Mike Singletary Mortgage Fraud Offense" begins with the premise that in your foreclosure court there are some nameless players who aren't really affecting the game as much as you think.

These players include the Imposter and Fictitious Payee Foreclosing party who is pushing a baseless claim and its attorneys who are the puppets voicing this claim. But, there is one party in your court who is keeping you from winning.

It is no secret that I think it is your judge and I am almost always right.  So, to explain my strategy let's pretend that your court is a football game. You are in the right which puts you down on your opponent's 30-yard line with the ball and one minute left to score a touchdown and win the game.   Your foreclosure judge is the embodiment of Mike Singletary. For the 8 people in America who are not children, but still haven't heard of Mike Singletary, he was the phenomenal middle linebacker who was drafted by the Chicago Bears in the 2nd round of the 1981 NFL Draft and became to be known as probably the greatest linebacker of all time as "The Heart of the Defense" for the Chicago Bears' Monsters of the Midway in the mid-1980s.

So, in my little metaphor, Mike Singletary represents your judge and he has been knocking down passes, sacking you, the quarterback, stuffing all the running plays and pretty much controlling the game. He is offsides on every play.  He is holding lineman, interfering with pass receivers, roughing the quarterback and generally is operating with complete disregard for the rules.  There is no accountability for his actions.  No one will argue with him.  He is accountable to no one.  There are no consequences for his actions.

You are not going to win if Mike Singletary continues to play.

Therefore, Mike Singletary must be removed from play, no matter what it takes. So, you call a timeout and on the next play, you send 15 players on the field and hike the ball to the quarterback who takes a knee while the other 14 players pile on Mike and twist his ankles, bite his ears, and break his arm.

This is, of course, against the rules so you accept your penalty for "too many men on the field " and huddle up. Three plays later you score. You win because you neutralized the one person who is intent on beating you on this day and he could have without your brutal and decisive action.

MORTGAGE FRAUD: It Is A Straight Line! Your Entire Fraudulent Foreclosure Case Is Based On A Straight Line With No Gaps. But In Today's Corrupted System There Are Always Unexplainable Gaps.

If you fall during your life, it doesn't matter. You're never a failure as long as you try to get up. 

                                                                                                                          Evel Knievel

                           

Republished by Danny Hammond

I have read and I still read many messages from Borrowers

who are looking for help against mortgage fraud and wrongful foreclosure involving their homes.  Lately, I have run into

several Facebook Groups that exist for their members to collaborate and share their own searches on the internet

and strategies that they have heard about or read about.

There are some issues with this that are causing them to

get overwhelmed and stuck.  I know a lot about this.  

Not because I am so smart, but because I have gotten overwhelmed and stuck.

It was easier for me to overcome because I learned about the Chain of Title of records

recorded against the property that houses sit on starting at 12 years old with my Dad.  Most

people never really deal with it more than once or twice in their lives.

Everything in life has a straight line.  A beginning and the middle and the end.  They never

change positions.  In real estate, the straight line is usually more obvious than say a drive

across the country.

CONTINUE READING

The Borrower Can Challenge The Assignments Of The Security Instruments Pursuant To The Rulings In "Slorp": The United States Court Of Appeals 6th Circuit

They're leaving you nothing and nowhere to go
Just put you in the corner like an old banjo
The strings are breakin' but you can't say no
You're runnin' with the devil and it's touch and go

                                               Emerson Lake and Powel (Running with the Devil)

RICK A. SLORP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LERNER, SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; SHELLIE HILL; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

ALL OF THE FORECLOSING PARTIES HAVE BEEN USING THE WORN OUT INTERPRETATION  OF LAW,  SAYING "THE BORROWERS CANNOT CHALLENGE ANY ASSIGNMENTS OF THE MORTGAGE".   BUT, MORTGAGE FRAUD CHANGES ALL OF THAT ACCORDING TO THE SIXTH CIRCUIT APPEALS COURT IN "SLORP"!

   Republished by Danny Hammond

   The Foreclosure Solutions Group

   mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

The Imposter Foreclosing Party almost always claims that the Borrower (as the mortgagor) cannot challenge assignments. You did make your Promissory Note negotiable according to the terms of your Promissory Note that you allegedly signed. That is why the foreclosing parties use this interpretation.

But did the foreclosing party buy it legally? No almost assuredly it was never involved in a purchase and sale transaction which even involved any real purchase of your debt.  

When it did not, that's Fraud.  No matter what claims your foreclosing party makes if there is fraud present it changes the rules.  It is impossible to commit a legal act using fraudulent means or tactics.  So, this argument that the Borrower is a 3rd party to the sale of the loan and cannot challenge its validity is nonsense.  There are two reasons why I have never seen a good foreclosure (a legal one).

I really gained an understanding of how Borrowers were being railroaded and how real property laws were being broken many times every day by judges when I first read the case known as "Slorp". The attorneys we see as our adversaries could not operate as they do without the judge's inactions.  Like little kids, who without supervision, the attorneys will run amuck.  A judge is constitutionally bound to be this supervision.  It is the judge who is your adversary.  Continue reading this post and I have included the full case of Rick Slorp v Bank of America et. al.  This may be the best information you will ever read concerning your own case.

READ MORE OF FULL RULING IN THE SLORP CASE:

From "The Pro Se Series by Danny Hammond: THE IMPORTANCE OF CHALLENGING THE CONSTITUTIONAL STANDING TO FORECLOSE CONCERNING YOUR FRAUDULENT LENDER AND THE "SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION" OF THE COURT. THIS IS EXACTLY THE SAME IN BOTH JUDICIAL AND NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURES AND STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS

“Until you guys own your own souls you don't own mine. Until you guys can be trusted every time and always, in all times and conditions, to seek the truth out and find it and let the chips fall where they may—until that time comes, I have the right to listen to my conscience and protect my client the best way I can. Until I'm sure you won't do him more harm than you'll do the truth good. Or until I'm hauled before somebody that can make me talk."      Raymond Chandler "High Window"

Republished by Danny Hammond

IF YOU ONLY RETAIN THREE WORDS FROM THIS POST YOU WILL NOT HAVE WASTED YOUR TIME.

THE WORDS ARE:  "INJURY IN FACT"

Article III of the Constitution of the United States as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court has long ago established a constitutional, irreducible, minimum set of requirements for a party in a genuine dispute to establish that it has the Standing to redress a claimed "Injury In Fact" before it can bring a dispute before any court.

Without the existence of Standing all courts in the land must acknowledge that the court has no subject matter jurisdiction to hear any merits of a case and that it has no choice whatsoever but to dismiss the subject action.

In Borrower's cases, this subject action is the claim that the foreclosing party is the party in interest that has the "right" to foreclose on a Borrower's property and that it is claiming and proving that it has been injured by the Borrower enabling its right to foreclose.
The three requirements to prove Standing in a case involving Judicial Foreclosure state foreclosure actions in which the foreclosing party is the Plaintiff and the Borrower is the defendant.

CONTINUE READING  VERY IMPORTANT ARTICLE

To Comment or email:   mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

CLICK HERE TO TELL US WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE INCLUDED IN A "REAL ESTATE LAW" & "FORECLOSURE FRAUD ZOOM CLASS"

The Use of The Constitution Instead of Trying Over and Over To Find A Way To Convince A Judge He Does Not Now, Nor Did He Ever Understand What The Meaning Was In His Solemn Oath To Protect The Constitution And The Public's Confidence In the Courts As He Violates That Oath Over And Over In Fraudulent Foreclosure Cases

VIDEO: THE THREE SIMPLE WORDS THAT ARE NEEDED TO WIN MORTGAGE FRAUD FORECLOSURE CASES!

"INJURY IN FACT"

THE FORECLOSURE SOLUTIONS GROUP: CIVIL RIGHTS SERIES

Republished by Danny Hammond 04-22-2022

WOULD YOU LIKE A FREE ASSESSMENT  OF YOUR FORECLOSURE CASE?  FILL OUT THE FORM CLICK THIS LINE

email:   mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

THE LETTER: A Letter From A US Citizen Whom, It Seems, Feels The Same Way As Me About The Problem Of Judges Using Their Jobs, Without Constraints, To Abuse The Meanings Of Constitutional Law And To Violate Their Own Oaths

Republished by Danny Hammond.  This and other posts will be placed not chronologically, but by relevance.  They are in the order that I wish I would have learned the information.  DLH

 I have not edited any of the words of this letter, however, I did add spacing since the writer (perhaps a bad student) wrote this harsh observation as a single paragraph and it was a little hard to read.   DLH

 

THE LETTER:

At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government.

Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous;

that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large;

that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and working its change by construction, before anyone has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance.

In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account.

                              Thomas Jefferson: letter to Monsieur A. Coray, Oct 31, 1823

SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES, WALL STREET IS UP TO SOMETHING CONCERNING OUR HOMES AND I DON'T THINK WE ARE GOING TO LIKE IT: MORTGAGE FRAUD

"I've got to keep in some sort of touch with all the loose ends of this dizzy affair if I'm ever gonna make heads or tails of it."

                                                       Sam Spade

Republished by Danny Hammond

mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

Yes! Something is up in Wall Street Land.  I, and dozens of Mortgage Fraud experts have been expecting a very large spike in foreclosures.  There are a lot of judicial and non-judicial foreclosures going on as I speak.  

I haven't tried to confirm if they are mostly non-conforming loans which doesn't mean that the people have a bad loan.  Non-Conforming Loans simply don't conform to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's rules and conditions.  

My requests for help from Borrowers are much higher than I have had at any time.   And this is really my point.  We seem to have as many as four vaccines that have completed testing and are ready for approval.  By the end of December mass vaccinations will begin and all hell is going to break loose when all of the frozen foreclosures thaw out at the same time.   If you are one of the millions who have been waiting and hoping for the miracle that government will continue the freeze don't wait any longer.  It is the government's entities that have been held up and nothing is going to stop the tsunami of foreclosures that will follow when they are cut loose.

(Here I think that some confusing terms need clarification.  This is true for home loans in general, the confusing terms come from the old common law which was in place for hundreds of years before being clarified in the Uniform Commercial Code.  For this article let's go through the synonyms that sound different but are actually interchangeable.

[The Borrower is the]                                  [The Lender, Foreclosing Party, Servicer, ]

Mortgagor                                                    Mortgagee

Obligor                                                        Obligee

Issuer                                                           Issuee

Grantor                                                       Grantee

The differences here are minor, but all of them mean it was the Borrower that created the flow of funds to the home loan by signing the original Promissory Note and the collateral instrument (mortgage or Deed of Trust) over to the actual Lender or Holder in Due Course using his or her signature.

FHA, Hud, FHFA, FNMA, and Freddie are all unable to have their servicers or correspondents foreclose on government conforming loans which are the vast majority of loans due to a government moratorium on foreclosures due to the Covid-19 pandemic.  This brings up a lot of bad things for a lot of American citizens.  You are in foreclosure due to fraud that the government could easily fix by making all judges run their courts as directed by Article III of the constitution.  So, the government puts no one in jail and our courts give our homes to funny-sounding parties, such as one I saw today "PLANET MORTGAGE" which has no right to foreclose.  I have never seen a foreclosing party in any state even try to meet the Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements of Article III STANDING.

CONTINUE READING                                                        Get Help With Your Case

From The Mortgage Fraud "Pro Se" Series by Danny Hammond: I Am Going To Show You Why I Say, "If You Hire An Attorney You Will Lose"- Neil Garfield has gotta go!

At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government.

Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; 

that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large;

that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and working its change by construction, before anyone has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance.

  

In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account.

                                                     Thomas Jefferson: letter to Monsieur A. Coray, Oct 31, 1823

NEWS FLASH!!

I have to add something astounding to this article.  I had a borrower send me 3 Neil Garfield articles.  I don't know if he was being smug, or if he had a question, or if it didn't mean anything.

I answered him by asking him what he wanted and why he would send me Neil Garfield's articles.  As I was shutting down my computer, just now, I had to shut down his emails from my screen.  Then I saw something that I had never noticed.  Neil has his credentials on his website.  We know he is an attorney, so that is pretty bad for a Borrower to have to see.  But, just below, I am going to show you my 2nd email to this Borrower.  I could not believe it.  If you have never read this article, this writing in red is going to be a real spoiler.  SPOILER ALERT!

Reposted out of dread

by Danny Hammond   mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

I am not an attorney.  Thank god.  I am not a lawyer.  I don't even know the difference.  You must not construe what I say and write as the learned knowledge spewing from someone who only took 3 credit hours on real estate in law school and passed the bar.  Although, I really do believe that I could pass the bar right now.  But, warning!! I am not an attorney!!  Another warning!!! Who would believe that an attorney who only took 3 credit hours of real estate law is capable of going up against the Gangsters that you have been dealing with?  Do not take my advice as an attorney.  I am not an attorney and that is good news for you.  I am a real estate broker and a mortgage broker with 30 years of credits in real estate law and mortgage documents.  I brokered the loan on my own house.   CONTINUE READING    

DO NOT QUIT READING.  CLICK ON THE BLUE "CONTINUE READING"!  THIS ARTICLE IS NOW A PERFECT DESCRIPTION OF THE "CHAOS" THEORY OF MORTGAGE FRAUD.  IF YOU DON'T READ IT ALL, YOU WILL BE GOING BACKWARD. 

"SUE YOUR FORECLOSURE JUDGE": That Slogan Is Not Completely Correct In Essence; It Is A Simple Phrase I Use To Get Your Attention Directed To The Inescapable Fact That There Is Only One Party Responsible For ALL Of The Illegal Acts In Your Foreclosure Case

Get a Review of Your Foreclosure Case

by Danny Hammond

If you have been wanting to know more about my "Sue Your Foreclosure Judge" slogan, the truth is that it should be called: 

"Sue The Citizen That Was Not A Judge Because He Had Disobeyed His Oath And Constitutional Law When He Had Not Reviewed The Filings To Determine Whether The Foreclosing Party Had Met the Constitutional Requirements For Standing".

However, that is not as catchy or as easy to understand.

This subject brings 12,000 visits to my website each and every month.  But, I am puzzled that I don't understand the reason why they come.

When I do the Zoom classes I never have anyone argue or debate whether I am right.  I get many questions and seems like Borrowers understand the answers.  Then they leave that thought and start telling me every mean and nasty thing that was done to them by everyone that participated in cases that lasted 2 to 12 years.  None of that matters.  Their cases, my cases, your case, they are all void and they never happened anyway.  We are all still at the beginning of the case.  At the starting line.  Your judge has already injured you and his actions represent the worst violations of law that a judge can commit.

I have told you the reason your case has lasted too long, but I have somehow done all of you a disservice.  I am not getting across to you that your research, and studying, and collaborating with Borrowers who have had similar experiences, and hiring attorneys is, all of it, wasting your time, lowering your resolve, and spending more money than you have.

In other words, that paragraph is the only plan that the bad guys have used since 2001.  Their antics are part of some grand scheme to get you to research and collaborate with others and hire attorneys to take up your time, lower your resolve and break your back and ass.  They could not do it if judges were just doing a bad job of carrying out the law.  But, no.  They are giving it all that they got to take your house and give it to a stranger and break CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS concerning your civil rights to Due Process of Law which can be found in the 5th and 14th amendments to the Constitution and which are civil rights.

What happens when you hear what I say and you believe my reasoning, but you can't quite see why it is true.  I think that it is because what I am telling you is "UNBELIEVABLE".  And it really is.  

But, now you have seen an attempted "coup d'état" by a group of Americans whose goal was to take over the government in the building where the government was governing the United States in order to overthrow the democratically elected government.  And please.  Don't accuse me of being for a democrat or republican, or whatever else your weakness to fend off conspiracy lies makes you believe.  You are on my website.  I am trying to help you for free.  It shouldn't make any difference if I was a martian.  Get over yourself.

CONTINUE READING:  This one is IMPORTANT

Get a Review of Your Foreclosure Case

YOU WORKED HARD TO SAVE YOUR HOME FROM FORECLOSURE AND STILL LOST IT OR ARE LOSING IT. WERE YOU DOOMED BY MORTGAGE FRAUD BEFORE YOU EVEN STARTED?.... YEP. I RECKON SO.

BUT, USING YOUR RIGHTS IN THE CONSTITUTION, YOU CAN STILL GET IT BACK! 

Fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten.-  

                                                                   G.K. Chesterton

After seven years of doing nothing else, but studying and researching mortgage fraud, I have finally figured out how to tell you how the whole deal worked.

 I have had a dozen epiphanies along the way.  Each time I believed that I had finally discovered the formula of winning cases that should have been winners.

But, in actuality, I had found something very important, but there was another layer just behind it.  Like the way actors describe an onion and how you peel away one layer just to find another under it over and over.

Recently, I got my head around two rather significant issues.    CONTINUE READING

GET  A DETAILED REVIEW OF YOUR CASE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS

ASK ABOUT STUDENT LOANS-CREDIT CARDS- AND ALL OTHER COLLECTION ISSUES

An Email Conversation That highlights The Problems Borrowers Are Having In Finding Real World Help In Stopping Wrongful Foreclosures And The Would Be Consultants Coaching Pro Se Who Are Suffering The Same Dilemma: We Are All Running Out Of Money And Personal Will To Go On

Return to Facebook

 by Danny Hammond & Cindy (not her real name)

DLH:  Oh come on Cindy, it cost me 10 years of my life, $300,000 in savings, my wife and family. I have lost over $9,000 a month in rental income, $500k in lost equity, and $100k in paying people for services that lost my home and wasted my time. I'm not going to do your deal for free. I have already told you what you are asking me now. If you didn't get it Cindy it's not because I'm smarter,  I have just seen it way more times than you.

Cindy:  I did not ask you to do my deal for free so I do not understand where you came up with that idea, however, you have left me with just a riddle. 

I have lost way too much going down rabbit holes with little explanation and promises of being the only one who could save my home and yet everyone failed me. I need to fully understand what you are saying/proposing, if not it is worthless because I will not be able to follow through.

I need to understand how your plan gets past res judicata, I need to understand how you will get me past being officially labeled a vexatious litigant. I don't mind paying a reasonable amount for help because I know I cannot do this alone, but you have to understand how many people promised me so much and totally let me down. 

DLH:  I have told you more than you think.  I wouldn't delete this thread, Cindy.  Read it again.

Danny Hammond signing off. Peace out.

Cindy:   You don’t know what I’ve been through.  I have spent over $16,000 on attorneys since 2010.  Each one left me off worse than when they started.  I have been Pro Se for 5 years.  I have no money left.  But, I want to save my home.  I need help now.  Not a riddle to solve. CONTINUE READING

Dlh: If you have come to this website for the reasons I think you have, I strongly recommend you read more

Do You Want To Ask About Affordable Answers For Stopping Your Foreclosure? Click This Line

WHY FORECLOSURE FRAUD CASES CANNOT BE WON NORMALLY...LIKE MOST CONTRACT LAW CASES IT IS THE COURT'S INHERENT BIAS & IGNORANCE AND THE BETRAYAL OF THEIR OATH TO THE CONSTITUTION

"When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hang on." 

                                                                                        -Franklin D. Roosevelt

WOULD YOU LIKE A FREE ASSESSMENT OF YOUR FORECLOSURE CASE? FILL OUT THE FORM CLICK THIS LINE

After nine years of fighting Promissory Note and Mortgage Fraud and never actually losing a case (nor ever quite winning outright in a normal way), I have figured out exactly why a case cannot be won by a borrower in any conventional way, yet winning should always have been a dunk shot if adjudicated correctly according to the constitution. I was dumbfounded. I have nearly stopped helping others, at least until  I prove convincingly that what I learned was right. Well, I am about to find out.

"CASES HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUDICATED CORRECTLY"?

By Danny Hammond

If you have tried to take your mortgage fraud case to court and you were absolutely convinced that you were a victim of fraud and you still want to fight your foreclosure, then you need foreclosure defenses to stop the judge from saying or demonstrating in any way his bias against borrowers or to completely dismiss all of the real facts in all cases.

 

I know how your civil rights work. What you believed so far is true and you were right. You just didn't have the proper info. You were fighting the wrong fight. If you have not taken your case to court yet, the above will happen when you do. I am using the simplest and most direct strategies to

 

overturn, or vacate, all foreclosures.  The founding fathers knew that one-day judges would do this.  they wrote the remedy into the constitution. 

 

It has been there waiting for this time since 1787.   CONTINUE READING

 

 

WOULD YOU LIKE A FREE ASSESSMENT

OF YOUR FORECLOSURE CASE? 

FILL OUT THE FORM CLICK THIS LINE

MORTGAGE FRAUD-THE SACKING OF ROME IN 410 AD-THE GLASS STEAGALL ACT OF 1933 AND THE REASON FOR THE USE OF FIREWALLS

"When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.”        Theodore Roosevelt

[Glass-Steagall Act of 1933] link

Reposted because I have always liked it and not enough people have read it.

by Danny Hammond

FIREWALLS:  This word is broadly defined. But, I think we can all agree that it is a device or strategy placed within a system to back up the day to day rules and regulations are attacked from outside or within the system and this attack bypasses the system to cause damage to that system.

I just read that and yes, it will work for the purpose of this article.

Although the date of the founding of Rome is steeped in legend and mystery, as well as some historical writings, it is generally considered to be April 21, 753 BC. Since it is a story of at least one thousand two hundred years and it has to do with brothers named Romulus and Remus and something about their mother being a She-Wolf,  for the duration of this article we will just use the above date. All agreed?  Yes.

My only reason for referencing Rome is that throughout all of its in-fighting, treachery, betrayal, greatness, open government, etc., Rome survived so long because there were always in place some "must always be so" rules.

KEEP READING  I PROMISE THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT HOME LOAN FRAUD AND I'LL GET TO IT.  CLICK HERE

FREE DETAILED REVIEW OF YOUR FORECLOSURE CASE WITH STRATEGIES TO USE CLICK THIS LINE