Sunday, August 25, 2024
What If Your Wrongful Foreclosure Was Already Void, But You Were Unaware Of This Fact?
Monday, January 8, 2024
MORTGAGE FRAUD: It Is A Straight Line! Your Entire Fraudulent Foreclosure Case Is Based On A Straight Line With No Gaps. But In Today's Corrupted System There Are Always Unexplainable Gaps.
"I have complete faith in the continued absurdity of whatever's going on."
Friday, January 5, 2024
From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: DIRTY DEEDS DONE DIRT CHEAP: FORECLOSURE FRAUD DEPENDS ON JUST A FEW PLAYERS TO BE SUCCESSFUL.
I lead a life of crime!
Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!
Dirty Deeds and their done dirt cheap! AC DC
Jackson County is just one medium-sized county in the United States.
If you want me to name these firms in this blog and tell what I know about each one, then fill out the form below (you don't have to put your name or contact info) just let me know that you are pissed off.)
QUESTION: HOW MANY SOCIOPATHIC RACKETEER ENTERPRISE PARTIES DOES IT TAKE TO STEAL YOUR HOUSE?
Thursday, January 4, 2024
From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: BORROWERS AS PRO SE WIN BIG FORECLOSURE FRAUD LAWSUIT AND GET THE HOUSE PLUS $2.5 MILLION DAMAGES
"Turn this thing around,
Friday, November 10, 2023
The Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements of Article III Standing As Defined By the The United States Supreme Court- From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: Foreclosure Fraud Primer 101 #4
The United States Constitution
by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press
The judge promised when he took the job that he, or she, would enforce and protect the laws that come from the constitution and that they would defend the public perception of the court ferociously in order to keep from losing the public trust in the integrity of the court.
Maybe that was too much to ask from some pompous asses. Why did we all expect more of judges and attorneys anyway? If I am any part of the public, then I can tell you for sure, the courts have already lost some of MY public trust.
It is difficult for me to pull Borrowers back from their searches for Promissory Notes, and the Assignments of Mortgage, MERS, PSA, etc., etc., thinking like Dick Tracy and Perry Mason, as well as Captain Kirk looking for a way to "prove" that the party trying to foreclose on them does not have the RIGHT or, STANDING, to do so.
Saturday, November 4, 2023
Fraudulent Foreclosure and the Danny Hammond MIKE SINGLETARY Offense For Borrowers Facing Fraudulent Foreclosure
Vince Lombardi
by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press
The theory behind my "Mike Singletary Mortgage Fraud Offense" begins with the premise that in your foreclosure court there are some nameless players who aren't really affecting the game as much as you think.
You are not going to win if Mike Singletary continues to play.
Tuesday, July 4, 2023
The Borrower Can Challenge The Assignments Of The Security Instruments Pursuant To The Rulings In "Slorp": The Full Case is Included Here
Just put you in the corner like an old banjo
The strings are breakin' but you can't say no
You're runnin' with the devil and it's touch and go
ALL OF THE FORECLOSING PARTIES HAVE BEEN USING THE WORN OUT INTERPRETATION OF LAW, SAYING "THE BORROWERS CANNOT CHALLENGE ANY ASSIGNMENTS OF THE MORTGAGE". BUT, MORTGAGE FRAUD CHANGES ALL OF THAT ACCORDING TO THE SIXTH CIRCUIT APPEALS COURT IN "SLORP"!
Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press
mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
|
The Imposter Foreclosing Party almost always claims that the Borrower (as the mortgagor) cannot challenge assignments. You did make your Promissory Note negotiable according to the terms of your Promissory Note that you allegedly signed. That is why the foreclosing parties use this interpretation.
But did the foreclosing party buy it legally? No almost assuredly it was never involved in a purchase and sale transaction which even involved any real purchase of your debt.
Saturday, June 3, 2023
MORTGAGE FRAUD-THE SACKING OF ROME IN 410 AD-THE GLASS STEAGALL ACT OF 1933 AND THE REASON FOR THE USE OF FIREWALLS
Reposted because I have always liked it and not enough people have read it.
by Danny Hammond |
KEEP READING I PROMISE THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT HOME LOAN FRAUD AND I'LL GET TO IT. CLICK HERE
Friday, May 12, 2023
Jeffrey Stephan 2nd Deposition: How Do You Confess To 10,000 Foreclosure Forgeries Per Month and No One Goes To Jail? Why Doesn't The American Public Know? These Are Well-Published Facts.
Saturday, April 23, 2022
From "The Pro Se Series by Danny Hammond: THE IMPORTANCE OF CHALLENGING THE CONSTITUTIONAL STANDING TO FORECLOSE CONCERNING YOUR FRAUDULENT LENDER AND THE "SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION" OF THE COURT. THIS IS EXACTLY THE SAME IN BOTH JUDICIAL AND NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURES AND STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS
IF YOU ONLY RETAIN THREE WORDS FROM THIS POST YOU WILL NOT HAVE WASTED YOUR TIME.
THE WORDS ARE: "INJURY IN FACT"
Article III of the Constitution of the United States as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court has long ago established a constitutional, irreducible, minimum set of requirements for a party in a genuine dispute to establish that it has the Standing to redress a claimed "Injury In Fact" before it can bring a dispute before any court.
Without the existence of Standing all courts in the land must acknowledge that the court has no subject matter jurisdiction to hear any merits of a case and that it has no choice whatsoever but to dismiss the subject action.
In Borrower's cases, this subject action is the claim that the foreclosing party is the party in interest that has the "right" to foreclose on a Borrower's property and that it is claiming and proving that it has been injured by the Borrower enabling its right to foreclose.
The three requirements to prove Standing in a case involving Judicial Foreclosure state foreclosure actions in which the foreclosing party is the Plaintiff and the Borrower is the defendant.
To Comment or email: mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
Friday, April 22, 2022
The Use of The Constitution Instead of Trying Over and Over To Find A Way To Convince A Judge He Does Not Now, Nor Did He Ever Understand What The Meaning Was In His Solemn Oath To Protect The Constitution And The Public's Confidence In the Courts As He Violates That Oath Over And Over In Fraudulent Foreclosure Cases
Monday, April 4, 2022
Wednesday, March 30, 2022
From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: LET'S ALL JUST TAKE THREE STEPS BACK FROM CRAZY! THAT IS RULE #1-- WHEN FIGHTING MORTGAGE FRAUD:
Crazy, I just cannot bear, That I'm living with something that just isn't fair
Mental wounds not healing.....Who and what's to blame
The Supreme Court settled the matter of assigning a mortgage or deed of trust in 1872. You can't assign those instruments. The case is CARPENTER V LONGAN AND THE CASE IS IN THIS ARTICLE JUST BELOW.
Find out why any assignment of the security agreement is void. Keep reading.
IN THE 26 STATES THAT USE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE THE MORTGAGE IS CALLED A DEED OF TRUST. THE WORD MORTGAGE IS RARELY SPOKEN IN THESE STATES.
In Judicial foreclosure states, the assignment of the security instrument involves what is called a mortgage. A mortgage is not a home loan. It is merely the rule book concerning the collateral you put up to ensure that the bank will be paid back.
A mortgage has no value and the assignment of a mortgage does NOT transfer your home loan from one party to another. In the Non-Judicial States, the security instrument is called a Deed of Trust which serves the same purpose as a mortgage. There is no such thing as "the assignment of a mortgage or a deed of trust. The mortgage or deed of trust exists only as part of the loan agreement and it is incidental. The security instrument is known as the incidental instrument (there are no laws that require collateral for a loan at all.)
Your house is the usual collateral involving a home loan because that is where the loan money was spent. But, collateral could also consist of one thousand Schwinn bicycles in a warehouse. It is my strong personal belief that all (ALL) of the foreclosures in the United States from about the year 2000, or earlier, are based on the exact (EXACT) same lie. What is that lie?
CARPENTER V LONGAN (SUPREME COURT 1872) THE ENTIRE RULING IS NEXT
Tuesday, February 2, 2021
From The Mortgage Fraud "Pro Se" Series by Danny Hammond: I Am Going To Show You Why I Say, "If You Hire An Attorney You Will Lose"- Neil Garfield has gotta go!
I am not an attorney. Thank god. I am not a lawyer. I don't even know the difference. You must not construe what I say and write as the learned knowledge spewing from someone who only took 3 credit hours on real estate in law school and passed the bar. Although, I really do believe that I could pass the bar right now. But, warning!! I am not an attorney!! Another warning!!! Who would believe that an attorney who only took 3 credit hours of real estate law is capable of going up against the Gangsters that you have been dealing with? Do not take my advice as an attorney. I am not an attorney and that is good news for you. I am a real estate broker and a mortgage broker with 30 years of credits in real estate law and mortgage documents. I brokered the loan on my own house. CONTINUE READING