"Huh"? |
Hubzu is not a typical Real Estate Sales company. It is a Dark Participant of a "Racketeering Enterprise".
"Huh"? |
“I needed a drink, I needed a lot of life insurance, I needed a vacation, I needed a home in the country. What I had was a coat, a hat and a gun. I put them on and went out of the room.”
― Raymond Chandler, Farewell, My Lovely
Republished by Danny Hammond
mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
|
IF YOU ONLY RETAIN THREE WORDS FROM THIS POST YOU WILL NOT HAVE WASTED YOUR TIME.
THE WORDS ARE: "INJURY IN FACT"
Article III of the Constitution of the United States as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court has long ago established a constitutional, irreducible, minimum set of requirements for a party in a genuine dispute to establish that it has the Standing to redress a claimed "Injury In Fact" before it can bring a dispute before any court.
Without the existence of Standing all courts in the land must acknowledge that the court has no subject matter jurisdiction to hear any merits of a case and that it has no choice whatsoever but to dismiss the subject action.
In Borrower's cases, this subject action is the claim that the foreclosing party is the party in interest that has the "right" to foreclose on a Borrower's property and that it is claiming and proving that it has been injured by the Borrower enabling its right to foreclose.
The three requirements to prove Standing in a case involving Judicial Foreclosure state foreclosure actions in which the foreclosing party is the Plaintiff and the Borrower is the defendant.
To Comment or email: mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
BUT, USING YOUR RIGHTS IN THE CONSTITUTION, YOU CAN STILL GET IT BACK!
Fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten.-
G.K. Chesterton
After seven years of doing nothing else, but studying and researching mortgage fraud, I have finally figured out how to tell you how the whole deal worked.
I have had a dozen epiphanies along the way. Each time I believed that I had finally discovered the formula of winning cases that should have been winners.
But, in actuality, I had found something very important, but there was another layer just behind it. Like the way actors describe an onion and how you peel away one layer just to find another under it over and over.
Recently, I got my head around two rather significant issues. CONTINUE READING
GET A DETAILED REVIEW OF YOUR CASE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
ASK ABOUT STUDENT LOANS-CREDIT CARDS- AND ALL OTHER COLLECTION ISSUES