CONTINUE READING
Sunday, July 16, 2023
What If Your Wrongful Foreclosure Was Already Void, But You Were Unaware Of This Fact?
CONTINUE READING
Wednesday, July 12, 2023
The Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements of Article III Standing As Defined By the The United States Supreme Court- From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: Foreclosure Fraud Primer 101 #4
The United States Constitution
by Danny Hammond mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
The judge promised when he took the job that he, or she, would enforce and protect the laws that come from the constitution and that they would defend the court ferociously from losing the public trust in the integrity of the court.
Maybe that was too much to ask from some pompous asses. Why did we all expect more of judges and attorneys anyway? If I am any part of the public, then I can tell you for sure, the courts have already lost some of MY public trust.
It is difficult for me to pull Borrowers back from their searches for Promissory Notes, and the Assignments of Mortgage, MERS, PSA, etc., etc., thinking like Dick Tracy and Perry Mason, as well as Captain Kirk looking for a way to "prove" that the party trying to foreclose on them does not have the authority, or, STANDING, to do so.
But, if what I say is true and the judges are letting the attorneys run amuck like the 2nd graders in my description, who can blame the attorneys for running amuck. "Amuck" is quickly becoming synonymous with the "actions of the courts" to me.
If you had seen judges simply ignore proof when it is presented as much as I have, then what I am now really trying to say is that this whole thing is only about Standing and nothing else. The initial burden of determining if the foreclosing party is a party with Standing is the review of the concrete and particularized evidence and the review of that evidence and the burden of proof is on the foreclosing party and the review of this "concrete and particularized" proof is the very foundation of law and it is the judge who must find Standing of the Foreclosing Party or refuse to take the case. The burden of investigating the "story" of the foreclosing is NOT ON THE BORROWER.
Sunday, July 2, 2023
RATED LO For Disturbing Language by an Old Guy: In Debating About When It Is The Right Time to Sue Your Judge and Why I Have Become a Little Testy. I Just Wrote This To Tom Who I Really Respect.
“I needed a drink, I needed a lot of life insurance, I needed a vacation, I needed a home in the country. What I had was a coat, a hat and a gun. I put them on and went out of the room.”
― Raymond Chandler, Farewell, My Lovely
Thursday, June 15, 2023
Fraudulent Foreclosure and the Danny Hammond MIKE SINGLETARY Offense For Borrowers Facing Fraudulent Foreclosure
Vince Lombardi
by Danny Hammond
The theory behind my "Mike Singletary Mortgage Fraud Offense" begins with the premise that in your foreclosure court there are some nameless players who aren't really affecting the game as much as you think.
You are not going to win if Mike Singletary continues to play.
Friday, May 12, 2023
Jeffrey Stephan 2nd Deposition: How Do You Confess To 10,000 Foreclosure Forgeries Per Month and No One Goes To Jail? Why Doesn't The American Public Know? These Are Well-Published Facts.
by Danny Hammond
Thursday, May 11, 2023
The King of Robo Signing Jeffrey Stephan's 1st Deposition As An Employee of GMAC Mortgage, LLC (or similarly named entities), Robo-Signing, 60 minutes, ROBO-SIGNING, 60 MINUTES, Tens of Millions of Stolen Homes, And No One In Govt or The Judiciary Saw a Thing.
Tuesday, May 9, 2023
MORTGAGE FRAUD: It Is A Straight Line! Your Entire Fraudulent Foreclosure Case Is Based On A Straight Line With No Gaps. But In Today's Corrupted System There Are Always Unexplainable Gaps.
Not because I am so smart, but because I have gotten overwhelmed and stuck.
CONTINUE READING
Monday, May 8, 2023
The Borrower Can Challenge The Assignments Of The Security Instruments Pursuant To The Rulings In "Slorp": The United States Court Of Appeals 6th Circuit
Just put you in the corner like an old banjo
The strings are breakin' but you can't say no
You're runnin' with the devil and it's touch and go
ALL OF THE FORECLOSING PARTIES HAVE BEEN USING THE WORN OUT INTERPRETATION OF LAW, SAYING "THE BORROWERS CANNOT CHALLENGE ANY ASSIGNMENTS OF THE MORTGAGE". BUT, MORTGAGE FRAUD CHANGES ALL OF THAT ACCORDING TO THE SIXTH CIRCUIT APPEALS COURT IN "SLORP"!
Republished by Danny Hammond
mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
|
The Imposter Foreclosing Party almost always claims that the Borrower (as the mortgagor) cannot challenge assignments. You did make your Promissory Note negotiable according to the terms of your Promissory Note that you allegedly signed. That is why the foreclosing parties use this interpretation.
But did the foreclosing party buy it legally? No almost assuredly it was never involved in a purchase and sale transaction which even involved any real purchase of your debt.
Sunday, May 7, 2023
THEY'RE GONNA PARTY LIKE IT'S 1999! DANNY HAMMOND FORECLOSURE FRAUD PRIMER 101 - JUST WHAT DID CAUSE THE WALL STREET MELTDOWN OF 2008
These words below do not come from current events. They aren't the only quotes from famous writer. They all have something to do with my thinking, as I have tried to do the right thing for all Borrowers who were cheated from obtaining the American Dream. “Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.” “Waste no more time arguing about what a good man should be. Be one.” “Understand at last that you have something in you more powerful and divine than what causes the bodily passions, and pulls you like a mere puppet. What thoughts now occupy my mind? Is it not fear, suspicion, desire, or something like that?” "The art of living is more like wrestling than dancing, because an artful life requires being prepared to meet and withstand sudden and unexpected attacks.” “You shouldn’t give circumstances the power to rouse anger, for they don’t care at all.” Anger is not thought. Anger is anti-thought. Marcus Aurelius Antoninus was Roman emperor from 161 to 180 AD and a Stoic philosopher. He was the last of the rulers known, non-contemporaneously, as the Five Good Emperors and the last emperor of the Pax Romana, an age of relative peace, calmness and stability for the Roman Empire lasting from 27 BC to 180 AD |
Tuesday, May 3, 2022
Everyone Has Their Own Pet Issue That Is "The Greatest Danger To American Democracy". I Believed It Was Congress "BAILING OUT" All 7 Of The Biggest Banks That Caused The "Wall Street" Meltdown. I Was Wrong It Was Our Judiciary.
The American Judiciary Is The Greatest Danger To American Democracy
Saturday, April 23, 2022
From "The Pro Se Series by Danny Hammond: THE IMPORTANCE OF CHALLENGING THE CONSTITUTIONAL STANDING TO FORECLOSE CONCERNING YOUR FRAUDULENT LENDER AND THE "SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION" OF THE COURT. THIS IS EXACTLY THE SAME IN BOTH JUDICIAL AND NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURES AND STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS
IF YOU ONLY RETAIN THREE WORDS FROM THIS POST YOU WILL NOT HAVE WASTED YOUR TIME.
THE WORDS ARE: "INJURY IN FACT"
Article III of the Constitution of the United States as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court has long ago established a constitutional, irreducible, minimum set of requirements for a party in a genuine dispute to establish that it has the Standing to redress a claimed "Injury In Fact" before it can bring a dispute before any court.
Without the existence of Standing all courts in the land must acknowledge that the court has no subject matter jurisdiction to hear any merits of a case and that it has no choice whatsoever but to dismiss the subject action.
In Borrower's cases, this subject action is the claim that the foreclosing party is the party in interest that has the "right" to foreclose on a Borrower's property and that it is claiming and proving that it has been injured by the Borrower enabling its right to foreclose.
The three requirements to prove Standing in a case involving Judicial Foreclosure state foreclosure actions in which the foreclosing party is the Plaintiff and the Borrower is the defendant.
To Comment or email: mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
Wednesday, March 30, 2022
From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: LET'S ALL JUST TAKE THREE STEPS BACK FROM CRAZY! THAT IS RULE #1-- WHEN FIGHTING MORTGAGE FRAUD:
Crazy, I just cannot bear, That I'm living with something that just isn't fair
Mental wounds not healing.....Who and what's to blame
The Supreme Court settled the matter of assigning a mortgage or deed of trust in 1872. You can't assign those instruments. The case is CARPENTER V LONGAN AND THE CASE IS IN THIS ARTICLE JUST BELOW.
Find out why any assignment of the security agreement is void. Keep reading.
I have reviewed hundreds, possibly thousands of home loan paperwork preceding a fraudulent foreclosure. I have read about many more. I have never seen any deal where the foreclosing party was not relying on an assignment of the security instrument.
IN THE 26 STATES THAT USE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE THE MORTGAGE IS CALLED A DEED OF TRUST. THE WORD MORTGAGE IS RARELY SPOKEN IN THESE STATES.
In Judicial foreclosure states, the assignment of the security instrument involves what is called a mortgage. A mortgage is not a home loan. It is merely the rule book concerning the collateral you put up to ensure that the bank will be paid back.
A mortgage has no value and the assignment of a mortgage does NOT transfer your home loan from one party to another. In the Non-Judicial States, the security instrument is called a Deed of Trust which serves the same purpose as a mortgage. There is no such thing as "the assignment of a mortgage or a deed of trust. The mortgage or deed of trust exists only as part of the loan agreement and it is incidental. The security instrument is known as the incidental instrument (there are no laws that require collateral for a loan at all.)
Your house is the usual collateral involving a home loan because that is where the loan money was spent. But, collateral could also consist of one thousand Schwinn bicycles in a warehouse. It is my strong personal belief that all (ALL) of the foreclosures in the United States from about the year 2000, or earlier, are based on the exact (EXACT) same lie. What is that lie?
CARPENTER V LONGAN (SUPREME COURT 1872) THE ENTIRE RULING IS NEXT
Tuesday, February 2, 2021
From The Mortgage Fraud "Pro Se" Series by Danny Hammond: I Am Going To Show You Why I Say, "If You Hire An Attorney You Will Lose"- Neil Garfield has gotta go!
I am not an attorney. Thank god. I am not a lawyer. I don't even know the difference. You must not construe what I say and write as the learned knowledge spewing from someone who only took 3 credit hours on real estate in law school and passed the bar. Although, I really do believe that I could pass the bar right now. But, warning!! I am not an attorney!! Another warning!!! Who would believe that an attorney who only took 3 credit hours of real estate law is capable of going up against the Gangsters that you have been dealing with? Do not take my advice as an attorney. I am not an attorney and that is good news for you. I am a real estate broker and a mortgage broker with 30 years of credits in real estate law and mortgage documents. I brokered the loan on my own house. CONTINUE READING
Saturday, December 19, 2020
IT IS ALWAYS THE INNOCENTS. THEY ARE JUST FAMILIES WHO BELIEVE IN THEIR COUNTRY AND ITS SYSTEM OF JUSTICE. I'M SICK OF IT. THE CRIME IS ALWAYS DONE THE SAME STUPID LITTLE WAY. THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAIL
Each Case Looks Different. Each Borrower Thinks That His or Her Case Has Special Details of Fraud or Criminal Behavior. Their Cases Are Not Different. Your Case Is Not Different.
So, Listen Up Kiddos. Here Are The Details That The Devil Is In (Learn it, Love it, Live it)
When I get a call from a Borrower wanting to talk over their foreclosure situation I always show them that they have nothing new, by showing them a magic trick. I tell them that I need two pieces of their records to put their case into a timeline. (See my article "It is a Straight Line" Everything is a Straight Line").
There are basically two sets of records in every case that exist and that have been based on the same set of fraudulent information since 1999. It never changes. There is no good reason to think about it. It makes no difference if your state is a judicial foreclosure state or a non-judicial foreclosure state. It doesn't matter if there is a server named Ocwen, Greentree, SPS, or the newly discovered Planet Mortgage. (The real name of a new mtg broker.)
The two sets of records are:
1.) The court docket is the listed items that have been "filed" into your case in the order and the date that they were recorded. This begins with a lawsuit (sometimes called a Complaint or Petition) and runs until there is an order or ruling which ("appears") to end the case. In a case filed before 1999, this filed order probably did end the case. That is not true, but we will get to that.
The docket includes everything that makes any difference which was filed by you, the foreclosing party, and the court.
2.) All of the instruments, documents, liens, and other "things" that have been recorded by the recorder's office in your county on or against or for the legal description in your case. If your case is a Federal Court the filed docket is there and the recorded "things of all kinds" affecting the legal description of your property are still at your county recorder's office.
First I will go in the loose order of what I expect I am going to see in every case.
Get a Review of Your Foreclosure Case
Monday, August 24, 2020
Blogger will not let me keep going down. So, if you want to see my Posts in a straight line. Click on the title to see MORE POSTS FROM THE FORECLOSURE SOLUTIONS GROUP & DANNY HAMMOND
CREDIT BID & DISTRIBUTION OF THE HOME FORECLOSURE SALE PROCEEDS: I AM SURE THOSE TWO PHRASES ARE FAMILIAR TO ALL OF MY READERS. NOT?
I CAN'T AFFORD AN ATTORNEY TO HELP ME DEFEND MY HOME FROM MORTGAGE FRAUD BY STOPPING FORECLOSURE
FRAUDULENT FORECLOSURE SALE WITH NO DETAILED ACCOUNTING OF THE DISBURSEMENT OF THE PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE
CONTRARY TO POPULAR BELIEF THE FOLLOWING CALCULATION IS RIDICULOUS MYTH AND LEGEND “BAD MORTGAGE LOAN” = “BAD MORTGAGE BORROWER”
MORTGAGE FRAUD: THERE IS NO MAGIC BULLET, TRICKY ANGLE, NOR AN "AHA!" MOMENT. THE REMEDY WAS EMBEDDED IN THE CONSTITUTION BY THE BRILLIANT ANCIENTS
WHAT IF YOUR WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE WAS ALREADY VOID, BUT YOU WERE UNAWARE OF IT?
IF YOU WERE FORECLOSED AFTER YOUR MONTHLY PAYMENT SUDDENLY JUMPED UP DRAMATICALLY, YOU WERE A VICTIM OF WHAT I CALL A CALENDAR ARM
SUBJECT: MORTGAGE FRAUD--I SAY THAT YOU SHOULD SUE YOUR JUDGE, BUT UNLESS I DO IT MYSELF ISN'T THAT ADVICE A LITTLE LAME.?
YOU HAVEN'T THOUGHT ABOUT THE MORTGAGE CRISIS FOR A LONG TIME. DID YOU THINK IT WAS OVER? THOUSANDS OF PENSION FUNDS BOUGHT THE WALL STREET MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES BONDS CALLED TOXIC BY FEDERAL RESERVE WHICH BOUGHT THEM BACK AT PAR WITH THE MONEY THEY PRINTED
MY NEW METAPHOR FOR "MORTGAGE FRAUD" IS A GAMBLING CASINO THAT LETS NO ONE WIN, WITHOUT ANYONE REALIZING IT