You Can Also See Danny Hammond Speaking His Mind At "Deep Thoughts While Staring At A Wall"

Deepthoughtswhilestaringatawall.blogspot.com
Showing posts with label Upcoming Pension Crisis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Upcoming Pension Crisis. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 18, 2020

From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: CREDIT BID & DISTRIBUTION OF THE HOME FORECLOSURE SALE PROCEEDS: I AM SURE THOSE TWO PHRASES ARE FAMILIAR TO ALL OF MY READERS. NOT?

CREDIT BID; DISTRIBUTION OF THE HOME SALE PROCEEDS: THE BIGGEST FRAUD IN FORECLOSURE FRAUD IS THE FRAUDULENT FORECLOSURE SALE!  WHY IS IT ONLY BOTHERING ME?

It ain't what you don't know that get's you into trouble, it's what you know for sure that just ain't so!"         -Mark Twain


by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 court press

 

Let's just go through some real quick statistics here.  In 1994 there were just 48 non-judicial foreclosures for the ENTIRE YEAR in Jackson County, Missouri (a large part of Kansas City, MO proper) It is probably about as average as a county can be.  It contains areas of urban, suburban, rural, and forest.  It is a good place for me to vet my own strategies.  But, every county, city, or town in America will most certainly have the same ratios of wrongful foreclosures which are easy to spot in every county recorder's office.

By 2001 there were 1,700.  By 2006 there were 7,200 Non-Judicial Foreclosures for Jackson County, Missouri. 

For the last four years, there has been an average of 300 Non-Judicial Foreclosures per month or an average of 3,600 Non-Judicial Foreclosures per year for the last eight years. 


That is 14,400 families displaced in one average county over four years and each and every one of these Non-Judicial Foreclosures was so fraudulent that it makes my eyes burn just to type this.

    
All of our country's courts are limited to having jurisdiction over disputes described as cases and controversies That means that two parties are arguing over their interests in the same subject matter.

 
In every foreclosure sale, I have ever read or heard about, the foreclosing party claims to have paid some amount of money for your home at a sale conducted by themselves and, in non-judicial foreclosure states, their personally substituted Trustee.  (26 states have these unconstitutional sales)   


Folks, It is a load of crap. They all are letting everyone believe it was a sure-fire honest deal. No, it wasn't. There is no way they had the legally obtained Promissory Note, or if it was Fannie Mae or JPMorgan or some other member of that ilk, there were probably two or three different versions of copies of your one and only Promissory Note filed into your court.

  
The judge can't help either party, but they do have to protect their own court.  The United States Constitution makes it the COURT's responsibility to see that the foreclosing party can prove it was even injured.  Injured means that they really LOST some money on your deal.


The courts are not doing this.  The judges not seeing this lack of Standing are either crooked, biased, or stupid.  Maybe all three.  But, it is their own hide that they should be protecting.


Do you want to visit to see if you think we can help?  Click this line



Saturday, August 1, 2020

WHO HAS STOLEN THE TRUCKERS MONEY? WE HAVEN'T HEARD MUCH HAVE WE. I BET YOU THOUGHT THE MORTGAGE MELTDOWN WAS OVER. NOT SO FAST. THOUSANDS OF RETIREMENT PENSION FUNDS LOST TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS BUYING THOSE MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES.

“I am concerned for the security of our great Nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within.”


       General Douglas MacArthur




Members of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and their supporters attend a rally outside the 
Capitol in Washington on April 14. The demonstrators protested a plan by the Central States Pension
Fund to reduce payments to retirees. (Drew Angerer/Bloomberg)


WHO DID YOU THINK THE WALL STREET STOCKBROKERS WERE SELLING THE CRIMINALLY FLAWED MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES TO?



COULD YOUR PENSION HAVE BEEN AFFECTED?  MANY HAVE BEEN.


Danny Hammond

Reposted from April 2016- because it is all coming back around.  You should be making plans.  My wife mentioned four years ago that she could see a revolution on the horizon once everyone understood how many people had been fraudulently thrown from their homes by their own American government and courts.


I have written about the investors in the Mortgage-Backed Security bonds which included many, many pension funds three years ago.  One hard-hit investor was the Boston Police pension fund, but they didn't know it yet.  I wondered to many people who would be dumb enough to defraud the retirement of every Boston policeman?
Who knows better how to get even?  My personal guess is nobody.  READ MORE

WOULD YOU LIKE A FREE ASSESSMENT
OF YOUR FORECLOSURE CASE? 
FILL OUT THE FORM CLICK THIS LINE
GO TO THE BEGINNING OF THIS BLOG

Thursday, July 30, 2020

The Securitization Debacle – A U.S. Pension Shortfall: $3.4 Trillion+ [$3,400,000,000,000] REPOSTED FROM 2019

“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.”
― Abraham Lincoln

by Danny Hammond

I have been writing about this subject extensively, especially the devastation brought on the American people by the Democrat President Bill Clinton and the Republican dominated Congress when in 1999 they repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933.  This Act which was the government's answer to what caused the Great Depression had kept the country's financial markets safe for nearly 70 years.  They Repealed the Act, but put no regulation in its place. Nine short years later the Great Wall Street Meltdown nearly broke the entire world's markets.  There is still no such regulation in place and foreclosures are still spiking and retirees are already seeing their retirement income cut.  Idiots.

Ms. Sullivan wrote this piece in 2016.  She was right on it then.  But, who do we complain to?  If we are to survive as a country, it is the people who must do the heavy lifting.   Danny Hammond


By Sydney Sullivan

looting the pension fundsPeople are wondering why unions are dwindling – it’s because of the securitization/rehypothecation scheme targeted unions to invest in their UNREGULATED DERIVATIVES,.  while Congress has done nothing to stop it. Union busting? Globalism? Agenda 21?

Shortfall. Unfunded. Underfunding.  It sounds like a minimal pension issue – however, it is anything but that. You may have heard the words “shortfall” when your state refers to its government budget or pension plan; and, if you are young (say, under 40), you’ve probably not given it a second thought. Just so you know “shortfall” is defined as “a failure to come up to expectation or need” and at 40 it seems like there will be plenty of time and ways to make up a shortfall… not so much when you are 60.

If you’re like many Americans, you’re worried about retirement. Maybe before the new century securitization scheme was launched, a “shortfall” might have been more easily explained and handled. But after 2000, the Wall Street securities system ramped up and took deficits to a new high while lining the pockets of Wall Street traders. How did this happen?
How did the USA get to over $3.4 TRILLION in unfunded pension debt? The answer is not something your Congressional or state legislators want to discuss in public …or even in confidence. What caused “shortfalls”? To understand how a state could get so severely “underfunded” with their pension funds, you must first understand that this hqdefault (1)didn’t just happen overnight. De-regulation and rule changing have been going on since the last Great Depression, though the final wallop occurred when Congress repealed Glass-Steagall in 1999. “Glass-Steagall was designed to prevent exactly the kind of collaboration that brought us the Goldman-Sachs fraud.” Source: Daily Kos.
Now, a lot of people blame a Republican Congress under the Clinton administration for the demise of Glass-Steagall – however, that is not altogether true. The House Democrats were instrumental in passing the repeal – even Nancy Pelosi (whose husband worked for Countrywide) voted “yea”. A sad fact, but true. We all make mistakes as both the parties agreed it was best to reinstate Glass-Steagall – at least as far as their party platforms go.

Check the record … how did your own Senators and Congresspersons vote?