Jeffrey Stephan 2nd Deposition: How Do You Confess To 10,000 Foreclosure Forgeries Per Month and No One Goes To Jail? Why Doesn't The American Public Know? These Are Well-Published Facts.

"If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace".   

                         December 19, 1776, Thomas Paine, The American Crisis, ...

by Danny Hammond

I am not posting the 2nd deposition of the most notorious Robo-Signor of them because you will learn

something new.

It is because you won't. Jeffrey Stephan describes in tortured detail the forging of fake assignments of

American families loans at a rate of 10,000 counterfeited and forged assignments and Promissory Notesper month by ten GMAC Mortgage Corp and GMAC Mortgage, LLC employees in one group.

We all knew this in 2012. It was out in broad daylight. You had to be wearing dark sunglasses to see it

comfortably. But, it was very, very, hard to miss. The problem was we could find no honest attorneys

and we didn't have quite enough procedural prowess to use it right.

This is 2023, we have that ability now. And there are more of us trying to work together.

The GMAC Mortgage, LLC attorney, Frank Lipsman of Kansas City, is doing everything he can to steal my

families home in a federal court case had to admit in Discovery that Jeffrey Stephan worked for six more

years for GMAC Mortgage, LLC, before going to work for Ocwen Loan Servicing an even more damaging

racketeering heir to the mountain of GMAC faked paper of tens of millions of loans.  

This was all approved by the 2nd District Federal Bankruptcy Court Judge Glenn. It is all public record.

(I could not make this stuff up: See my post archives for the Ocwen story)

But now on to the 2nd Jeffrey Stephan deposition which took place in the state of Maine

CONTINUE READING

The King of Robo Signing Jeffrey Stephan's 1st Deposition As An Employee of GMAC Mortgage, LLC (or similarly named entities), Robo-Signing, 60 minutes, ROBO-SIGNING, 60 MINUTES, Tens of Millions of Stolen Homes, And No One In Govt or The Judiciary Saw a Thing.

"Venal and evil men are destroying the world you were born in. It's us against them, my good friend. Don't compromise your principle  or abandon your cause." 

                                                                                             

Major General John Bell Hood CSA

I am as frustrated right now as I have ever been during the 12 years that I have been fighting

mortgage fraud.  In the movie "The Big Short" towards the end one of the Wall Street characters

is frustrated that a group of them has figured out how massive the fraud in mortgages has been. 

They even know who the worst perpetrators are beginning with Fannie Mae and working down through Citi Mortgage and the rest.  They have gone to all the big newspapers to blow the whistle just knowing in their minds and hearts that this is a near apocalypse and the biggest story in history.  Not one newspaper editor or reporter will give them the time of day.

1.  Because a fraud this large was too big to believe and 

2.  The newspapers' biggest stock owners were the same criminals running the fraud.

As they are walking back toward their office one of them muses, "I was afraid we were going to ceate panic in the streets.  I was sure that once people knew that their retirement plans had been ransacked by their own government and banking industry that we would have an actual revolution, an uprising by all Americans.  But look at them walking on along the street completely unaware and without enough background information to even get an inkling of what's going on.  And it's not their fault, they shouldn't have to worry about their lives being destroyed from within."

That's how I feel.  There are a scattered few around the country screaming their lungs out in warning, but the message isn't getting through.

I need to let one of the dupe perpetrators explain it to you himself.  What could be more powerful?

My 2nd most popular posting of all time on this blog is the one about GMAC/ResCap fraudulent bankruptcy where literally millions of homes are being taken from families by players like Fannie Mae (thank you US government), Ocwen, Nationstar, Green Tree, Seterus without any ties to the players they are stealing from.

Continue Reading

From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: LET'S ALL JUST TAKE THREE STEPS BACK FROM CRAZY! THAT IS RULE #1-- WHEN FIGHTING MORTGAGE FRAUD:

Heirs of a cold war,  that's what we've become

Inheriting troubles,  I'm mentally numb
Crazy, I just cannot bear,  That I'm living with something that just isn't fair
Mental wounds not healing.....Who and what's to blame

I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train,  I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train

                                                                                                                      Ozzy Osborne

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE:

 "ASSIGNMENT OF YOUR MORTGAGE",

EVEN THOUGH IT HAS BEEN USED ILLEGALLY

20 MILLION TIMES IN 15 YEARS

Republished by Danny Hammond

mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

The Supreme Court settled the matter of assigning a mortgage or deed of trust in 1872. You can't assign those instruments.  The case is CARPENTER V LONGAN AND THE CASE IS IN THIS ARTICLE JUST BELOW. 

Find out why any assignment of the security agreement is void.  Keep reading.


I have reviewed hundreds, possibly thousands of home loan paperwork preceding a fraudulent foreclosure.   I have read about many more.  I have never seen any deal where the foreclosing party was not relying on an assignment of the security instrument.  

IN THE 26 STATES THAT USE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE THE  MORTGAGE IS CALLED A DEED OF TRUST.  THE WORD MORTGAGE IS RARELY SPOKEN IN THESE STATES.

In Judicial foreclosure states, the assignment of the security instrument involves what is called a mortgage.  A mortgage is not a home loan.  It is merely the rule book concerning the collateral you put up to ensure that the bank will be paid back.  

A mortgage has no value and the assignment of a mortgage does NOT transfer your home loan from one party to another.  In the Non-Judicial States, the security instrument is called a Deed of Trust which serves the same purpose as a mortgage.  There is no such thing as "the assignment of a mortgage or a deed of trust.  The mortgage or deed of trust exists only as part of the loan agreement and it is incidental.  The security instrument is known as the incidental instrument (there are no laws that require collateral for a loan at all.)  

Your house is the usual collateral involving a home loan because that is where the loan money was spent.  But, collateral could also consist of one thousand Schwinn bicycles in a warehouse.  It is my strong personal belief that all (ALL) of the foreclosures in the United States from about the year 2000, or earlier, are based on the exact (EXACT) same lie.  What is that lie?

CARPENTER V LONGAN (SUPREME COURT 1872)  THE ENTIRE RULING IS NEXT

CONTINUE READING

You are reading this article on the Foreclosure Solutions Group website. Go to the website CLICK THIS LINE

WHO HAS STOLEN THE TRUCKERS MONEY? WE HAVEN'T HEARD MUCH HAVE WE. I BET YOU THOUGHT THE MORTGAGE MELTDOWN WAS OVER. NOT SO FAST. THOUSANDS OF RETIREMENT PENSION FUNDS LOST TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS BUYING THOSE MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES.

“I am concerned for the security of our great Nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within.”

       General Douglas MacArthur

Members of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and their supporters attend a rally outside the 
Capitol in Washington on April 14. The demonstrators protested a plan by the Central States Pension
Fund to reduce payments to retirees. (Drew Angerer/Bloomberg)

WHO DID YOU THINK THE WALL STREET STOCKBROKERS WERE SELLING THE CRIMINALLY FLAWED MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES TO?

COULD YOUR PENSION HAVE BEEN AFFECTED?  MANY HAVE BEEN.

Danny Hammond

Reposted from April 2016- because it is all coming back around.  You should be making plans.  My wife mentioned four years ago that she could see a revolution on the horizon once everyone understood how many people had been fraudulently thrown from their homes by their own American government and courts.

I have written about the investors in the Mortgage-Backed Security bonds which included many, many pension funds three years ago.  One hard-hit investor was the Boston Police pension fund, but they didn't know it yet.  I wondered to many people who would be dumb enough to defraud the retirement of every Boston policeman?
Who knows better how to get even?  My personal guess is nobody.  READ MORE

WOULD YOU LIKE A FREE ASSESSMENT
OF YOUR FORECLOSURE CASE? 
FILL OUT THE FORM CLICK THIS LINE
GO TO THE BEGINNING OF THIS BLOG

Foreclosure Fraud: Mortgage Fraud Does Not Mean the Same Thing as Home Loan Fraud

"WHAT IF THE HANKY PANKY IS WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT?"   

                                                                    A bumper sticker

A mortgage (the same thing as a Deed of Trust) is no more than the rule book for the agreement between the lender and the Borrrer of what happens if a Borrower can or cannot pay back his loan.   The presence of fraud isn't the burden of the Borrower to prove in court. That is the constitutional duty of the judge.  The judges are betraying their oath to protect the constitution and the "public perception of the nation's courts" on a massive scale.

by Danny Hammond
mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

MORTGAGE:  Defined as-- "mortgage [a conditional conveyance of property as security for the repayment of a loan]"  Proper term is "Security Instrument"

FRAUD:  Defined as-- an intentional misrepresentation of material existing fact made by one person to another with knowledge of its falsity and for the purpose of inducing the other person to act, and upon which the other person relies with resulting injury or damage.

Foreclosing Parties have to prove with concrete and particularized evidence that they are acting legally at the beginning of a case they begin because they are wanting to take something away from someone is who is in possession of the thing.  In other words, the Foreclosing Party must prove that they are, in fact, not committing fraud.  The Borrower is being made to "prove" fraud, by judges is a violation of the constitution, a very grave and wrongful act for a judge.  

CONTINUE READING