THE FHFA IS A CONSERVATOR … NOT A RECEIVER, COURT RULES! THEREFORE FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC ARE "NOT" STATE ACTORS

     "When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.”        Theodore Roosevelt

(BREAKING NEWS, OP-ED) —

FHFA stands for Federal Housing Finance Agency:

• 
  
• What it does:
• The FHFA is an independent agency that regulates and supervises Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks. The FHFA's mission is to promote a safer and stronger housing finance system in the United States. 
• How it's funded:
• The FHFA is funded by a portion of the budgets of Fannie, Freddie, and the FHLBanks. 
• Who leads it:
• The Honorable Sandra L. Thompson is the Director of the FHFA. She was sworn in on June 22, 2022. 
• What it's responsible for:
• Ensuring the regulated entities operate in the public interest 
• Addressing barriers to sustainable housing opportunities for underserved communities 
• Overseeing the fulfillment of the statutory purposes of the regulated entities)
• Promoting the safety and soundness of the regulated entities 
• 
  
• Danny Hammond Version:  The United States formed this entity to protect Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC)) from being sued by victims of their illeagal actions which facilitated millions of the fraudulent foreclosures.
• Fannie Mae foreclosed on $5 million worth of investment property that my wife and I had worked very hard on and and with earnings from other real estate projects we were able set the money aside to build these properties and we paid cash and had no loans.
• I am questioned often on how that can be true. Why do I think It is true?  Because Fannie and Freddie which were not part of the government before the Obama administration took them over after their own internal fraudulent acts caused the spectacular failures of Fannie, Freddie, and Ginne, the Obama Administration made them part of the government (as state actors) and you can't sue the government.  I have had a Federal Lawsuit against them since 2015.
• There are several recent court rulings that have determined that Fannie and Freddie are, in fact, not state actors.  
• If you have been foreclosed by either or these two criminal finance behemoths and you want to follow what I find out next, (and I will absolutely find out more) please send me an email to mtgfrd.info@gmail.com  Danny Hammond

      

                  Now, the facts, Scrounged up be Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

        

        This was sent to me as is.  I did not report this.  I would like to know who wrote this story and I 

        would like to get permission to print it here.  I would however, respect their wishes as to what I

        can do.  If the publishers would like to contact me at mtgfrd.info@gmail.com I will quickly                        respond.

    

          Danny Hammond

       

 FANNIE MAE FREDDIE MAC NEWS FOR FORECLOSED BORROWERS

For those of you who might have missed this Memorandum and Order out of Rhode Island (whose courts typically favor the banks and their servicers), you may wish to read this 19-page ruling:

Sisti v FHFA et al, US D. R.I. No 17-005 (Aug 2, 2018)

The FHFA attempted to get a judgment on the pleadings, which the court denied!   While this isn’t much of a setback, it does make clear a few potential misconceptions about Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the FHFA, the FDIC and the mortgage loan servicers who deal with these entities:

THE BUCK STOPS WHERE?

(1) Following the subprime mortgage crisis, Congress passed the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, which created the FHFA (Federal Housing Finance Agency), giving it the power to supervise and regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the government-sponsored entities, or GSEs). The FHFA pretty much has complete control over the activities of both GSEs, including their reorganization or rehabilitation.  In the fall of 2008, the director of the FHFA placed both GSEs into a CONSERVATORSHIP, NOT A RECEIVERSHIP!  The Director of the FHFA had a choice … he chose Conservatorship!

(2) There is no date set for when this conservatorship will end.  In the meantime, both GSEs are prohibited from paying any dividends to their common shareholders.

(3) The U.S. Government owns ALL of the senior preferred stock of BOTH GSEs. As a result, the U.S. Government gets perks that common stockholders don’t get.

(4) Both GSEs have received over $187-billion from the U.S. Treasury to maintain liquidity and have paid more than $249-billion in dividends back into the Treasury; however, the U.S. Government’s interest in the GSEs has not been diminished as a result.

HOMEOWNERS GOT SCREWED … AND SUED!

Read More

I will find out more and let you know here and on our YouTube Channel @mtgfrd

We are also setting up a Telegram Posting site.

WE ARE TRYING TO START AN ASSOCIATION OF FORECLOSED BORROWERS AND HOPEFULLY RAISE MONEY FOR BORROWERS WHO HAVE SPENT WAY MORE MONEY TRYING TO FIGHT FORECLOSURES THAN SHOULD HAVE BEEN NECESSARY IN A REAL DEMOCRACY.

PLEASE HELP BY GOING TO THE YOUTUBE CHANNEL @mtgfrd AND CLICK ON SUBSCRIBE AND LIKE EVERYWHERE YOU CAN. IT IS FREE FOR YOU TO DO, BUT IT HELPS TREMENDOUSLY IN OUR EFFORT TO TRY TO RAISE ENOUGH MONEY TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

Please visit our YouTube Channel by searching @mtgfrd and Subscribing and Liking us if you believe it is a good idea to try to get us all into one group with one voice.

If you would like to have us evaluate your situation please fill out this form:

Click for Form Here

The Term "Void" Is Often Used In Contrast To "Voidable" And "Unenforceable". The Main Difference Is That An Action That Is Voidable Remains Valid Until It Is Avoided.

“I was playing for time. Just for time. I played the wrong way, of course.”

Raymond Chandler

"Here cum da Judge"

   by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press.

  

Surely no one can truly believe that it is the Borrowers that come up with these bizarre scenarios? 

My sister uh, Mary, is an attorney, who is probably the smartest person I have ever known, was home this weekend and I asked about maybe we should be objecting to the new judge in this case who has oddly not committed a crime yet, and he was going to take over to provide cover for the original judge who had committed all of the crimes by removing the case to Federal Court.  That is like stealing 3rd base from 1st base.  No one would do that.  The Constitution is perfectly clear.  Not on stealing 3rd, but removing a VOID case to Federal court.  You can't do that.  

Although, if he says one more sentence, we are gonna pounce hard on him and make him the defendant, not as a judge but as himself, and make it stick.  

Mary came up with a Motion For Reconsideration, which startled me because I had actually begun to believe that was a term I made up, because I never had a judge comment on it, even though I tried it over 7 and a half billion times while helping Borrowers understand courts and such.

I told her that I just didn't see how you could remove VOID.  It is unthinkable.  Void cannot be arranged.  It is nothingness.  It never was.  I can never even be.

She kind of agreed.  But, neither of us could explain that notion in "earth terms". 

(You see most attorneys don't ever deal with law all that much.  Except sewer court rat attorneys like ambulance chasers and Borrower representation in foreclosure)

Borrowers have been treated differently than other contract law cases all along.  That is why we do not have contract law directly associated with our cases, which no one seems to care if this is true.  

That is why Blue Planet's attorney (Blue Planet in this case is the Foreclosing Party in this case and improbably changes from Plaintiff to Defendant at will) uses bombastic writings designed to wow and scare the defendants by bluffing and using what he says are reasons and truths that are neither.

In the first answered filed in the Complaint (lawsuit he wrote, The reason we have the right to foreclose, is because we are the ABSOLUTE owner of the Note by Assignment of the Mortgage on Jan. 25th, Stardate 26785.

He is not making even nominal good sense.   In law, rights must be proven that cannot just be claimed.  But, the bad guys have been doing it for 22 years and very, very rarely do they get caught.

Read More

If you would like to have us evaluate your situation please fill out this form:

Click for Form Here

LET'S ALL JUST TAKE THREE STEPS BACK FROM CRAZY! THAT IS RULE #1-- WHEN FIGHTING MORTGAGE FRAUD:

 Heirs of a cold war,  that's what we've become, Inheriting troubles,  I'm mentally numb

Crazy, I just cannot bear,  That I'm living with something that just isn't fair, Mental wounds not healing.....Who and what's to blame

I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train,  I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train

                                                                                                                      Ozzy Osborne

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE:  "ASSIGNMENT OF YOUR MORTGAGE",

EVEN THOUGH IT HAS BEEN USED ILLEGALLY 30 MILLION TIMES IN 22 YEARS

The Supreme Court settled the matter of assigning a mortgage or deed of trust in 1872. You can't assign those instruments.  The case is CARPENTER V LONGAN AND THE CASE IS IN THIS ARTICLE JUST BELOW. 

Find out why any assignment of the security agreement is void.  Keep reading.

Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

I have reviewed hundreds, possibly thousands of home loan paperwork preceding a fraudulent foreclosure.   I have read about many more.  I have never seen any deal where the foreclosing party was not relying on an assignment of the security instrument.  

IN THE 26 STATES THAT USE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE THE  MORTGAGE IS CALLED A DEED OF TRUST.  THE WORD MORTGAGE IS RARELY SPOKEN IN THESE STATES.

In Judicial foreclosure states, the assignment of the security instrument involves what is called a mortgage.  A mortgage is not a home loan.  It is merely the rule book concerning the collateral you put up to ensure that the bank will be paid back.  

A mortgage has no value and the assignment of a mortgage does NOT transfer your home loan from one party to another.  In the Non-Judicial States, the security instrument is called a Deed of Trust which serves the same purpose as a mortgage.  There is no such thing as "the assignment of a mortgage or a deed of trust.  The mortgage or deed of trust exists only as part of the loan agreement and it is incidental.  The security instrument is known as the incidental instrument (there are no laws that require collateral for a loan at all.)  

Your house is the usual collateral involving a home loan because that is where the loan money was spent.  But, collateral could also consist of one thousand Schwinn bicycles in a warehouse.  It is my strong personal belief that all (ALL) of the foreclosures in the United States from about the year 2000, or earlier, are based on the exact (EXACT) same lie.  What is that lie?

CARPENTER V LONGAN (SUPREME COURT 1872)  THE ENTIRE RULING IS NEXT

CONTINUE READING    mtgfrd.info@gmail.com   For questions or comments

But, check out the recently upgraded YouTube Channel @mtgfrd or search "Danny Hammond Foreclosure that should get you in.  Leave comments.  And if you think I am on the right track, then like all the good ones say, "Subscribe, join, and hit the like button.

It doesn't cost anything, but if enough of us join in it could make money.  We don't need as much as we used to.  It can be done with a small staff.  I have now seen it.

If you get a chance try the YouTube Channel all you put in search is "  @mtgfrd  "  

You can email me at   mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

If you would like to have us evaluate your situation please fill out this form:

Click for Form Here

As You Review This Website Regarding Foreclosure, You Are Going To Find That My Bias Is Moving Further Away From The Search For The "Silver Bullet" Statute Or Case Law Answers You Seek

"I decided I could lose nothing by trying the soft approach.  If that didn't produce for me—and I didn't think it would—nature could take its course and we could bust up the furniture.”                                  

                               Phillip Marlowe character from Raymond Chandler's – "The Lady In The Lake"

 

      

by Danny Hammond of The 3/4 Court Press

This is not because the laws of nearly 238 years of our judiciary's history are gone. They are there and remarkably very well reasoned and written.  The problem has to do with a question I have with the present day courts veering away without apparantly noticing when we use them in Borrower foreclosure cases without mentioning or discussing them.  If it is not intentional then they are stupid and if it is intentional they have broken the only laws that you have a right to sue them for.

The Question is this:  Is a law, a law, when it is not enforced?

It isn't the attorneys getting away with total lack of use of law or breaking the law.  It is not the Servicers.  They wouldn't do it if they lost all the time and even went to jail, which is what they are so close to, but it never happens.

They couldn't do it unless, someone let them. 
I say you are going to have to look somewhere else, if you want to keep your house.

READ MORE         "Do you think you have a problem, but want a review?

I am going to inactivate this website for maintenance.  It needs some tuning up and changes after 14 years. We are going to need it for my plan to form an association of Borrowers to raise money to help as many  as we can.

I will leave messages here.  But, check out the recently upgraded YouTube Channel @mtgfrd or search "Danny Hammond Foreclosure that should get you in.  Leave comments.  And if you think I am on the right track, then like all the good ones say, "Subscribe, join, and hit the like button. It doesn't cost anything, but if enough of us join in it could make money.  We don't need as much as we used to.  It can be done with a small staff.  I have now seen it.

If you get a chance try the YouTube Channel all you put in search is "  @mtgfrd  "  If that doesn't work you can search "Danny Hammond Foreclosure"  I think that will take you right there.

More informatrion here tomorrow.   You can email me at   mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

What Is Up With The Judges In Wrongful Foreclosure Cases?" This Is Another Post Inspired By My Good Friend Tom Kibler. He Knows More About Statute and Case Law Than Anyone. He Copied Me An Email He Had Sent To A Large Number Of People. Since 2010 Everyone Has Been Searching For The Statute Or Case Law "Silver Bullet'".

 "Venal and evil men are destroying the world you were born in. It's us against them, my good friend. Don't compromise your principle  or abandon your cause." 

                                                                                             

                                                                                                 Major General John Bell Hood CSA

     Article by Danny Hammond

       of the 3/4 Court Press

The laws for land ownership have not changed appreciably for two hundred years.  All the laws you find, we found 10 to 12 years ago.  For the most part they are very good and fair and if you are getting swindled IT IS BECAUSE a judge is working to derail you.

We all presented these laws to judges over and over and over.  It got to the point that we joked about the fact that all of the judges at all levels of judiciary in the United States attended a "crooked judge" convention in Las Vegas every two years to figure out their new strategy for siding with attorneys to swindle borrowers being wrongfully foreclosed.

Of course, that is not it.

Judges are all attorneys who got to be judges by attending clubs, and cocktail parties of important people, old judges and political parties. Most of them probably have not learned anything new since they graduated from law school.  I know I am an idiot, but I am convinced that I can pass the Missouri Bar without studying at any time I choose.  Idiot or not, I believe that.

READ MORE

Would you like a free review of your loan and foreclosure documents?

mtgfrd.info@gmail.com Comment or Ask Questions

I am going to inactivate this website for maintenance.  It needs some tuning up and changes after 14 years. We are going to need it for my plan to form an association of Borrowers to raise money to help as many  as we can.

I will leave messages here.  But, check out the recently upgraded YouTube Channel @mtgfrd or search "Danny Hammond Foreclosure that should get you in.  Leave comments.  And if you think I am on the right track, then like all the good ones say, "Subscribe, join, and hit the like button. It doesn't cost anything, but if enough of us join in it could make money.  We don't need as much as we used to.  It can be done with a small staff.  I have now seen it.

If you get a chance try the YouTube Channel all you put in search is "  @mtgfrd  "  If that doesn't work you can search "Danny Hammond Foreclosure"  I think that will take you right there.

More informatrion here tomorrow.   You can email me at   mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

The Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements for Standing

MORTGAGE FRAUD PRO SE PRIMER 101 #4:  THE CONSTITUTIONAL IRREDUCIBLE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR STANDING AS DEFINED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

“Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities. Truth isn’t.”

                                         Mark Twain

Actually, it is Strange, That Is Truther Than Fiction.

Danny Hammond

If you walk into a 2nd grade elementary school class room and see that all of the boys are standing on their desks shaking their butts, laughing and shouting, and throwing things at the girls in the class, who respond by screaming and running, and then you notice that the 2nd grade teacher is setting at his desk doing nothing to stop the chaos, would you really blame, the children?

No, it is the teacher who is in charge of the room.  If the teacher does not enforce the rules of classroom behavior, then the children will act like wild monkeys.  How would they know not to? 

It is no different than the judge in the court case who is charged with controlling and enforcing correctness in information and procedure in a court case.  

If the judge does not enforce the constitution, which is all that keeps this country great; or If the judge does not make the attorneys prove their claims and/ or does not keep them from claiming transfers of ownership of essential Promissory Notes with assignments of incidental security instruments (mortgage or deed of trust) which do nothing but describe the collateral, then, of course the attorneys are going to forge and fake and lie, worse than wild monkeys. (Carpenter v Longan US Sup Ct 1872 from the Colorado Territory (except the monkey part)

Then lack of subject matter jurisdiction is the fault of the judge of the court.  He or she has wrongly put the burden of proof of standing on the borrower (very nearly every time), yet it is very clearly the burden of the court.  The court is allowing the Borrower to prove he was defrauded.  That is bizarre.  The very definition of fraud means it was hidden from the borrower.

Continue Reading

Comment or Ask Questions At: mtgfrd.info@gmail.com Comment or Ask Questions

Would you like a free review of your loan and foreclosure documents?