Showing posts with label cases and controversies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cases and controversies. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 27, 2024

LET'S ALL JUST TAKE THREE STEPS BACK FROM CRAZY! THAT IS RULE #1-- WHEN FIGHTING MORTGAGE FRAUD:

 Heirs of a cold war,  that's what we've become, Inheriting troubles,  I'm mentally numb

Crazy, I just cannot bear,  That I'm living with something that just isn't fair, Mental wounds not healing.....Who and what's to blame

I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train,  I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train
                                                                                                                      Ozzy Osborne


THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE:  "ASSIGNMENT OF YOUR MORTGAGE",

EVEN THOUGH IT HAS BEEN USED ILLEGALLY 30 MILLION TIMES IN 22 YEARS




The Supreme Court settled the matter of assigning a mortgage or deed of trust in 1872. You can't assign those instruments.  The case is CARPENTER V LONGAN AND THE CASE IS IN THIS ARTICLE JUST BELOW. 

Find out why any assignment of the security agreement is void.  Keep reading.




Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press


I have reviewed hundreds, possibly thousands of home loan paperwork preceding a fraudulent foreclosure.   I have read about many more.  I have never seen any deal where the foreclosing party was not relying on an assignment of the security instrument.  

IN THE 26 STATES THAT USE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE THE  MORTGAGE IS CALLED A DEED OF TRUST.  THE WORD MORTGAGE IS RARELY SPOKEN IN THESE STATES.

In Judicial foreclosure states, the assignment of the security instrument involves what is called a mortgage.  A mortgage is not a home loan.  It is merely the rule book concerning the collateral you put up to ensure that the bank will be paid back.  


A mortgage has no value and the assignment of a mortgage does NOT transfer your home loan from one party to another.  In the Non-Judicial States, the security instrument is called a Deed of Trust which serves the same purpose as a mortgage.  There is no such thing as "the assignment of a mortgage or a deed of trust.  The mortgage or deed of trust exists only as part of the loan agreement and it is incidental.  The security instrument is known as the incidental instrument (there are no laws that require collateral for a loan at all.)  


Your house is the usual collateral involving a home loan because that is where the loan money was spent.  But, collateral could also consist of one thousand Schwinn bicycles in a warehouse.  It is my strong personal belief that all (ALL) of the foreclosures in the United States from about the year 2000, or earlier, are based on the exact (EXACT) same lie.  What is that lie?


CARPENTER V LONGAN (SUPREME COURT 1872)  
THE ENTIRE RULING IS NEXT

CONTINUE READING    mtgfrd.info@gmail.com   For questions or comments


But, check out the recently upgraded YouTube Channel @mtgfrd or search "Danny Hammond Foreclosure that should get you in.  Leave comments.  And if you think I am on the right track, then like all the good ones say, "Subscribe, join, and hit the like button.

It doesn't cost anything, but if enough of us join in it could make money.  We don't need as much as we used to.  It can be done with a small staff.  I have now seen it.

If you get a chance try the YouTube Channel all you put in search is "  @mtgfrd  "  
You can email me at   mtgfrd.info@gmail.com


If you would like to have us evaluate your situation please fill out this form:

Wednesday, January 10, 2024

What Is Up With The Judges In Wrongful Foreclosure Cases?" This Is Another Post Inspired By My Good Friend Tom Kibler. He Knows More About Statute and Case Law Than Anyone. He Copied Me An Email He Had Sent To A Large Number Of People. Since 2010 Everyone Has Been Searching For The Statute Or Case Law "Silver Bullet'".

 "Venal and evil men are destroying the world you were born in. It's us against them, my good friend. Don't compromise your principle  or abandon your cause." 
                                                                                             
                                                                                                 Major General John Bell Hood CSA



   
 Article by Danny Hammond
       of the 3/4 Court Press

The laws for land ownership have not changed appreciably for two hundred years.  All the laws you find, we found 10 to 12 years ago.  For the most part they are very good and fair and if you are getting swindled IT IS BECAUSE a judge is working to derail you.

We all presented these laws to judges over and over and over.  It got to the point that we joked about the fact that all of the judges at all levels of judiciary in the United States attended a "crooked judge" convention in Las Vegas every two years to figure out their new strategy for siding with attorneys to swindle borrowers being wrongfully foreclosed.

Of course, that is not it.

Judges are all attorneys who got to be judges by attending clubs, and cocktail parties of important people, old judges and political parties. Most of them probably have not learned anything new since they graduated from law school.  I know I am an idiot, but I am convinced that I can pass the Missouri Bar without studying at any time I choose.  Idiot or not, I believe that.

mtgfrd.info@gmail.com Comment or Ask Questions

I am going to inactivate this website for maintenance.  It needs some tuning up and changes after 14 years. We are going to need it for my plan to form an association of Borrowers to raise money to help as many  as we can.

I will leave messages here.  But, check out the recently upgraded YouTube Channel @mtgfrd or search "Danny Hammond Foreclosure that should get you in.  Leave comments.  And if you think I am on the right track, then like all the good ones say, "Subscribe, join, and hit the like button. It doesn't cost anything, but if enough of us join in it could make money.  We don't need as much as we used to.  It can be done with a small staff.  I have now seen it.

If you get a chance try the YouTube Channel all you put in search is "  @mtgfrd  "  If that doesn't work you can search "Danny Hammond Foreclosure"  I think that will take you right there.

More informatrion here tomorrow.   You can email me at   mtgfrd.info@gmail.com


Wednesday, May 10, 2023

The Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements for Standing

MORTGAGE FRAUD PRO SE PRIMER 101 #4:  THE CONSTITUTIONAL IRREDUCIBLE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR STANDING AS DEFINED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT


Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities. Truth isn’t.”

                                         Mark Twain


Actually, it is Strange, That Is Truther Than Fiction.

Danny Hammond


If you walk into a 2nd grade elementary school class room and see that all of the boys are standing on their desks shaking their butts, laughing and shouting, and throwing things at the girls in the class, who respond by screaming and running, and then you notice that the 2nd grade teacher is setting at his desk doing nothing to stop the chaos, would you really blame, the children?

No, it is the teacher who is in charge of the room.  If the teacher does not enforce the rules of classroom behavior, then the children will act like wild monkeys.  How would they know not to? 

It is no different than the judge in the court case who is charged with controlling and enforcing correctness in information and procedure in a court case.  

If the judge does not enforce the constitution, which is all that keeps this country great; or If the judge does not make the attorneys prove their claims and/ or does not keep them from claiming transfers of ownership of essential Promissory Notes with assignments of incidental security instruments (mortgage or deed of trust) which do nothing but describe the collateral, then, of course the attorneys are going to forge and fake and lie, worse than wild monkeys. (Carpenter v Longan US Sup Ct 1872 from the Colorado Territory (except the monkey part)

Then lack of subject matter jurisdiction is the fault of the judge of the court.  He or she has wrongly put the burden of proof of standing on the borrower (very nearly every time), yet it is very clearly the burden of the court.  The court is allowing the Borrower to prove he was defrauded.  That is bizarre.  The very definition of fraud means it was hidden from the borrower.

Continue Reading


Comment or Ask Questions At: mtgfrd.info@gmail.com Comment or Ask Questions