The Term "Void" Is Often Used In Contrast To "Voidable" And "Unenforceable". The Main Difference Is That An Action That Is Voidable Remains Valid Until It Is Avoided.

“I was playing for time. Just for time. I played the wrong way, of course.”

Raymond Chandler

"Here cum da Judge"

   by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press.

  

Surely no one can truly believe that it is the Borrowers that come up with these bizarre scenarios? 

My sister uh, Mary, is an attorney, who is probably the smartest person I have ever known, was home this weekend and I asked about maybe we should be objecting to the new judge in this case who has oddly not committed a crime yet, and he was going to take over to provide cover for the original judge who had committed all of the crimes by removing the case to Federal Court.  That is like stealing 3rd base from 1st base.  No one would do that.  The Constitution is perfectly clear.  Not on stealing 3rd, but removing a VOID case to Federal court.  You can't do that.  

Although, if he says one more sentence, we are gonna pounce hard on him and make him the defendant, not as a judge but as himself, and make it stick.  

Mary came up with a Motion For Reconsideration, which startled me because I had actually begun to believe that was a term I made up, because I never had a judge comment on it, even though I tried it over 7 and a half billion times while helping Borrowers understand courts and such.

I told her that I just didn't see how you could remove VOID.  It is unthinkable.  Void cannot be arranged.  It is nothingness.  It never was.  I can never even be.

She kind of agreed.  But, neither of us could explain that notion in "earth terms". 

(You see most attorneys don't ever deal with law all that much.  Except sewer court rat attorneys like ambulance chasers and Borrower representation in foreclosure)

Borrowers have been treated differently than other contract law cases all along.  That is why we do not have contract law directly associated with our cases, which no one seems to care if this is true.  

That is why Blue Planet's attorney (Blue Planet in this case is the Foreclosing Party in this case and improbably changes from Plaintiff to Defendant at will) uses bombastic writings designed to wow and scare the defendants by bluffing and using what he says are reasons and truths that are neither.

In the first answered filed in the Complaint (lawsuit he wrote, The reason we have the right to foreclose, is because we are the ABSOLUTE owner of the Note by Assignment of the Mortgage on Jan. 25th, Stardate 26785.

He is not making even nominal good sense.   In law, rights must be proven that cannot just be claimed.  But, the bad guys have been doing it for 22 years and very, very rarely do they get caught.

Read More

If you would like to have us evaluate your situation please fill out this form:

Click for Form Here

LET'S ALL JUST TAKE THREE STEPS BACK FROM CRAZY! THAT IS RULE #1-- WHEN FIGHTING MORTGAGE FRAUD:

 Heirs of a cold war,  that's what we've become, Inheriting troubles,  I'm mentally numb

Crazy, I just cannot bear,  That I'm living with something that just isn't fair, Mental wounds not healing.....Who and what's to blame

I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train,  I'm goin' off the rails on a crazy train

                                                                                                                      Ozzy Osborne

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE:  "ASSIGNMENT OF YOUR MORTGAGE",

EVEN THOUGH IT HAS BEEN USED ILLEGALLY 30 MILLION TIMES IN 22 YEARS

The Supreme Court settled the matter of assigning a mortgage or deed of trust in 1872. You can't assign those instruments.  The case is CARPENTER V LONGAN AND THE CASE IS IN THIS ARTICLE JUST BELOW. 

Find out why any assignment of the security agreement is void.  Keep reading.

Republished by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press

I have reviewed hundreds, possibly thousands of home loan paperwork preceding a fraudulent foreclosure.   I have read about many more.  I have never seen any deal where the foreclosing party was not relying on an assignment of the security instrument.  

IN THE 26 STATES THAT USE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE THE  MORTGAGE IS CALLED A DEED OF TRUST.  THE WORD MORTGAGE IS RARELY SPOKEN IN THESE STATES.

In Judicial foreclosure states, the assignment of the security instrument involves what is called a mortgage.  A mortgage is not a home loan.  It is merely the rule book concerning the collateral you put up to ensure that the bank will be paid back.  

A mortgage has no value and the assignment of a mortgage does NOT transfer your home loan from one party to another.  In the Non-Judicial States, the security instrument is called a Deed of Trust which serves the same purpose as a mortgage.  There is no such thing as "the assignment of a mortgage or a deed of trust.  The mortgage or deed of trust exists only as part of the loan agreement and it is incidental.  The security instrument is known as the incidental instrument (there are no laws that require collateral for a loan at all.)  

Your house is the usual collateral involving a home loan because that is where the loan money was spent.  But, collateral could also consist of one thousand Schwinn bicycles in a warehouse.  It is my strong personal belief that all (ALL) of the foreclosures in the United States from about the year 2000, or earlier, are based on the exact (EXACT) same lie.  What is that lie?

CARPENTER V LONGAN (SUPREME COURT 1872)  THE ENTIRE RULING IS NEXT

CONTINUE READING    mtgfrd.info@gmail.com   For questions or comments

But, check out the recently upgraded YouTube Channel @mtgfrd or search "Danny Hammond Foreclosure that should get you in.  Leave comments.  And if you think I am on the right track, then like all the good ones say, "Subscribe, join, and hit the like button.

It doesn't cost anything, but if enough of us join in it could make money.  We don't need as much as we used to.  It can be done with a small staff.  I have now seen it.

If you get a chance try the YouTube Channel all you put in search is "  @mtgfrd  "  

You can email me at   mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

If you would like to have us evaluate your situation please fill out this form:

Click for Form Here

RATED LO For Disturbing Language by an Old Guy: In Debating About When It Is The Right Time to Sue Your Judge and Why I Have Become a Little Testy. I Just Wrote This To Tom Who I Really Respect.

“I needed a drink, I needed a lot of life insurance, I needed a vacation, I needed a home in the country. What I had was a coat, a hat and a gun. I put them on and went out of the room.”
                                            

                                                                                           ― Raymond Chandler, Farewell, My Lovely

 One Of Those New Baby in a Box Gifts

  Tom, more than two times in that old law thing that you had me read, it            clearly says “It was formerly a rule on pleading that pleas……" This could        be a reference to old common law or even English law.

  Nowhere did I see stated any current law. I have read and researched and in    real life interaction with judges I have never seen any resistance to a pro Se      filing anything that an attorney can file. 

  Now I have seen judges not rule on a filing in 180 days when they only have    30 to rule on a dispositive motion. 

It is my strong opinion that a judge who has not taken up any dispositive Motion from me as directed by MO Sup Ct Civil Procedure (and the federal court system)  has committed the crime of deprivation of my civil rights. 

 But you can’t jump up on his bench and slap the dumb fuck around until he recognizes his duty. (Although I am thinking about trying) 

READ MORE

Would you like a free review of your loan and foreclosure documents?

THEY'RE GONNA PARTY LIKE IT'S 1999! DANNY HAMMOND FORECLOSURE FRAUD PRIMER 101 - JUST WHAT DID CAUSE THE WALL STREET MELTDOWN OF 2008

 (Mortgage Meltdown Is The Wrong Terminology.  It was a Wall Street Meltdown)

These words below do not come from current events.  They aren't the only quotes from this famous writer. They all have something to do with my thinking, as I have tried to do the right thing for all Borrowers who were cheated from obtaining the American Dream.

 

 “Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.”

 “Waste no more time arguing about what a good man should be. Be one.”

 

 “Understand at last that you have something in you more powerful and divine than what causes the bodily passions, and pulls you like a mere puppet. What thoughts now occupy my mind? Is it not fear, suspicion, desire, or something like that?”

 

 "The art of living is more like wrestling than dancing, because an artful life requires being prepared to meet and withstand sudden and unexpected attacks.”

 

 “You shouldn’t give circumstances the power to rouse anger, for they don’t care at all.”  Anger is not thought.  Anger is anti-thought.

  

 Marcus Aurelius Antoninus was Roman emperor from 161 to 180 AD and a Stoic philosopher. He was the last of the rulers known, non-contemporaneously, as the Five Good Emperors and the last emperor of the Pax Romana, an age of relative peace, calmness and stability for the Roman Empire lasting from 27 BC to 180 AD

 

 

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 Court Press
 

For those of you who have followed the news for the last several weeks, did you notice that four medium banks had failed suddenly?

 

 The word "medium" is what I would like to point out first.  These were medium banks by todays measure.  Before 1999 they would have been mega banks.  But, the last of these four recent banks to fail and be snatched up by the one time failures of Wall was purchased by JpMorgan Chase Bank a bank that is mega by today's standards.  JpMorgan Bank, Bank of America, Citi, Wells Fargo

 

 In September 2008, Congress approved the “Bailout Bill,” which provided $700 billion to add emergency liquidity to the markets. Through the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) passed in October 2008, the U.S. Treasury added billions more to stabilize financial markets - including buying equity in banks.

  

Now, if you don't know this you should.  That when you read the government used money to prop up the same broke banks that stole our houses that the government they were talking about was our government.  In other words, you as a taxpayer and all of your taxpayer compadres took this burden on our consolidated taxpayer backs.

 

The Federal Reserve began buying the same mortgage-backed securities that myself  

and everyone I know that thinks about this stuff looked for many years years to find any mortgage-backed securities and found none.  The Federal Reserve which is not part of the US Government is an association of US Banks has been buying $40 Billion of mortgage-backed securities every month by printing the money (which is very, very inflationary) with our money printer which is again placed on the backs of the US taxpayers.  (If you are a taxpayer this includes you)

 

What caused all this ruckus?  Well our government in 1934 was nothing like the lunatic asylum that it is today.   Smart men with no television and no mega yachts, and believed in facts and truth studied what caused the 1929 Wall Street Crash and the ensuing Great Depression.  The law that they came up with was called the Glass-Steagall Finance Act of 1934.

 

Any one can understand that the two most important parts of it are what kept our country's economy safe for nearly 70 years.  In 1999 the democrat president Clinton and a Republican Congress thought it would be best if they repealed Glass-Steagall in full without putting back any laws in its place.  8 years later all of our lives were destroyed and we were left with nothing except the pleasure of paying all of the broke mega banks money to make them rich again.  And we have a worn out money printer to replace.

 

 See all of the banks you helped rescue by paying off their debts since 1970  here.

Would you like a free review of your loan and foreclosure documents?

 

The Undisputed King of Robo Signing Jeffrey Stephan's 1st Deposition As An Employee of GMAC Mortgage, LLC (or similarly named entities), Robo-Signing, 60 minutes, ROBO-SIGNING, 60 MINUTES, Tens of Millions of Stolen Homes, And No One In Govt or The Judiciary Saw a Thing.

"Venal and evil men are destroying the world you were born in. It's us against them, my good friend. Don't compromise your principle  or abandon your cause." 

                                                                                             

Major General John Bell Hood CSA

I am as frustrated right now as I have ever been during the 12 years that I have been fighting

mortgage fraud.  In the movie "The Big Short" towards the end one of the Wall Street characters

is frustrated that a group of them has figured out how massive the fraud in mortgages has been. 

They even know who the worst perpetrators are beginning with Fannie Mae and working down through Citi Mortgage and the rest.  They have gone to all the big newspapers to blow the whistle just knowing in their minds and hearts that this is a near apocalypse and the biggest story in history.  Not one newspaper editor or reporter will give them the time of day.

1.  Because a fraud this large was too big to believe and 

2.  The newspapers' biggest stock owners were the same criminals running the fraud.

As they are walking back toward their office one of them muses, "I was afraid we were going to ceate panic in the streets.  I was sure that once people knew that their retirement plans had been ransacked by their own government and banking industry that we would have an actual revolution, an uprising by all Americans.  But look at them walking on along the street completely unaware and without enough background information to even get an inkling of what's going on.  And it's not their fault, they shouldn't have to worry about their lives being destroyed from within."

That's how I feel.  There are a scattered few around the country screaming their lungs out in warning, but the message isn't getting through.

I need to let one of the dupe perpetrators explain it to you himself.  What could be more powerful?

My 2nd most popular posting of all time on this blog is the one about GMAC/ResCap fraudulent bankruptcy where literally millions of homes are being taken from families by players like Fannie Mae (thank you US government), Ocwen, Nationstar, Green Tree, Seterus without any ties to the players they are stealing from.

Continue Reading

Everyone Has Their Own Pet Issue That Is "The Greatest Danger To American Democracy". I Believed It Was Congress "BAILING OUT" All 7 Of The Biggest Banks That Caused The "Wall Street" Meltdown. I Was Wrong It Was Our Judiciary.

 The American Judiciary Is The Greatest Danger To American Democracy

To Save Your Home You Have To Sue Your Judge And Your Attorney Won't Use Your Civil Rights. He is scared of the Judge.

But, really, Bailing out the Too Big To Fail Banks was stupid

        

by Danny Hammond

I seem to have the most diverse set of actual case examples of Judges ruling insanely against Borrower's that I have myself ever seen.

I have now topped my collection as I, acting as a landlord for once have had two trespassers in my 4,800 sq ft. Lake House at (dare I say it?) Lake of the Ozarks in Benton County Missouri.  The court is in Warsaw, MO and I have been trying to evict these trespassers for 15 months in an Unlawful Detainer court.  "Eviction Court".

 READ MORE

The Use of The Constitution Instead of Trying Over and Over To Find A Way To Convince A Judge He Does Not Now, Nor Did He Ever Understand What The Meaning Was In His Solemn Oath To Protect The Constitution And The Public's Confidence In the Courts As He Violates That Oath Over And Over In Fraudulent Foreclosure Cases

VIDEO: THE THREE SIMPLE WORDS THAT ARE NEEDED TO WIN MORTGAGE FRAUD FORECLOSURE CASES!

"INJURY IN FACT"

THE FORECLOSURE SOLUTIONS GROUP: CIVIL RIGHTS SERIES

Republished by Danny Hammond 04-22-2022

WOULD YOU LIKE A FREE ASSESSMENT  OF YOUR FORECLOSURE CASE?  FILL OUT THE FORM CLICK THIS LINE

email:   mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

"SUE YOUR FORECLOSURE JUDGE": That Slogan Is Not Completely Correct In Essence; It Is A Simple Phrase I Use To Get Your Attention Directed To The Inescapable Fact That There Is Only One Party Responsible For ALL Of The Illegal Acts In Your Foreclosure Case

Get a Review of Your Foreclosure Case

by Danny Hammond

If you have been wanting to know more about my "Sue Your Foreclosure Judge" slogan, the truth is that it should be called: 

"Sue The Citizen That Was Not A Judge Because He Had Disobeyed His Oath And Constitutional Law When He Had Not Reviewed The Filings To Determine Whether The Foreclosing Party Had Met the Constitutional Requirements For Standing".

However, that is not as catchy or as easy to understand.

This subject brings 12,000 visits to my website each and every month.  But, I am puzzled that I don't understand the reason why they come.

When I do the Zoom classes I never have anyone argue or debate whether I am right.  I get many questions and seems like Borrowers understand the answers.  Then they leave that thought and start telling me every mean and nasty thing that was done to them by everyone that participated in cases that lasted 2 to 12 years.  None of that matters.  Their cases, my cases, your case, they are all void and they never happened anyway.  We are all still at the beginning of the case.  At the starting line.  Your judge has already injured you and his actions represent the worst violations of law that a judge can commit.

I have told you the reason your case has lasted too long, but I have somehow done all of you a disservice.  I am not getting across to you that your research, and studying, and collaborating with Borrowers who have had similar experiences, and hiring attorneys is, all of it, wasting your time, lowering your resolve, and spending more money than you have.

In other words, that paragraph is the only plan that the bad guys have used since 2001.  Their antics are part of some grand scheme to get you to research and collaborate with others and hire attorneys to take up your time, lower your resolve and break your back and ass.  They could not do it if judges were just doing a bad job of carrying out the law.  But, no.  They are giving it all that they got to take your house and give it to a stranger and break CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS concerning your civil rights to Due Process of Law which can be found in the 5th and 14th amendments to the Constitution and which are civil rights.

What happens when you hear what I say and you believe my reasoning, but you can't quite see why it is true.  I think that it is because what I am telling you is "UNBELIEVABLE".  And it really is.  

But, now you have seen an attempted "coup d'état" by a group of Americans whose goal was to take over the government in the building where the government was governing the United States in order to overthrow the democratically elected government.  And please.  Don't accuse me of being for a democrat or republican, or whatever else your weakness to fend off conspiracy lies makes you believe.  You are on my website.  I am trying to help you for free.  It shouldn't make any difference if I was a martian.  Get over yourself.

CONTINUE READING:  This one is IMPORTANT

Get a Review of Your Foreclosure Case