An Email Conversation That highlights The Problems Borrowers Are Having In Finding Real World Help In Stopping Wrongful Foreclosures And The Would Be Consultants Coaching Pro Se Who Are Suffering The Same Dilemma: We Are All Running Out Of Money And Personal Will To Go On

Return to Facebook

 by Danny Hammond & Cindy (not her real name)

DLH:  Oh come on Cindy, it cost me 10 years of my life, $300,000 in savings, my wife and family. I have lost over $9,000 a month in rental income, $500k in lost equity, and $100k in paying people for services that lost my home and wasted my time. I'm not going to do your deal for free. I have already told you what you are asking me now. If you didn't get it Cindy it's not because I'm smarter,  I have just seen it way more times than you.

Cindy:  I did not ask you to do my deal for free so I do not understand where you came up with that idea, however, you have left me with just a riddle. 

I have lost way too much going down rabbit holes with little explanation and promises of being the only one who could save my home and yet everyone failed me. I need to fully understand what you are saying/proposing, if not it is worthless because I will not be able to follow through.

I need to understand how your plan gets past res judicata, I need to understand how you will get me past being officially labeled a vexatious litigant. I don't mind paying a reasonable amount for help because I know I cannot do this alone, but you have to understand how many people promised me so much and totally let me down. 

DLH:  I have told you more than you think.  I wouldn't delete this thread, Cindy.  Read it again.

Danny Hammond signing off. Peace out.

Cindy:   You don’t know what I’ve been through.  I have spent over $16,000 on attorneys since 2010.  Each one left me off worse than when they started.  I have been Pro Se for 5 years.  I have no money left.  But, I want to save my home.  I need help now.  Not a riddle to solve. CONTINUE READING

Dlh: If you have come to this website for the reasons I think you have, I strongly recommend you read more

Do You Want To Ask About Affordable Answers For Stopping Your Foreclosure? Click This Line

MORTGAGE FRAUD-THE SACKING OF ROME IN 410 AD-THE GLASS STEAGALL ACT OF 1933 AND THE REASON FOR THE USE OF FIREWALLS

"When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.”        Theodore Roosevelt

[Glass-Steagall Act of 1933] link

Reposted because I have always liked it and not enough people have read it.

by Danny Hammond

FIREWALLS:  This word is broadly defined. But, I think we can all agree that it is a device or strategy placed within a system to back up the day to day rules and regulations are attacked from outside or within the system and this attack bypasses the system to cause damage to that system.

I just read that and yes, it will work for the purpose of this article.

Although the date of the founding of Rome is steeped in legend and mystery, as well as some historical writings, it is generally considered to be April 21, 753 BC. Since it is a story of at least one thousand two hundred years and it has to do with brothers named Romulus and Remus and something about their mother being a She-Wolf,  for the duration of this article we will just use the above date. All agreed?  Yes.

My only reason for referencing Rome is that throughout all of its in-fighting, treachery, betrayal, greatness, open government, etc., Rome survived so long because there were always in place some "must always be so" rules.

KEEP READING  I PROMISE THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT HOME LOAN FRAUD AND I'LL GET TO IT.  CLICK HERE

FREE DETAILED REVIEW OF YOUR FORECLOSURE CASE WITH STRATEGIES TO USE CLICK THIS LINE

Mortgage Fraud: From The Danny Hammond Pro Se Primer 101- You Need To Forget The Past! Yes, Your Government and Your Courts Have Screwed You Big Time. So What? That's Only What Happened Just Up To Now.

“It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood;”
― Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers

I started a Facebook Group.  People joined it and I don’t know what I am supposed to do
except to try and guide the members to the only solutions for Foreclosure Fraud I can find.
Use the power of the United States Constitution.

In my group forum, I noticed that most people aren’t trying to go forward and save their

homes.  They are mostly poking fingers at people and institutions that they think F****d

them over.  They are right.

They are right in everything they are saying.  But today foreclosure is not about law.  It is

about Outlaws.

This is a very serious and dangerous problem.  It is going to determine the future of the
United States. We have a civic duty to sue a judge.  Embrace it. Do not fear it.

You can’t just point fingers.  You have to figure out who is really responsible for hurting you
and deliver some hurt right back at them.
CONTINUE READING:

CLICK HERE TO TELL US WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE INCLUDED IN "REAL ESTATE LAW"
& "FORECLOSURE FRAUD ZOOM CLASSES"

by Danny Hammond

Would You Like To Get Answers On Your Particular Situation?

MORTGAGE FRAUD: THERE IS NO MAGIC BULLET, TRICKY ANGLE, NOR AN "AHA!" MOMENT. THE REMEDY WAS EMBEDDED IN THE CONSTITUTION BY THE BRILLIANT ANCIENTS

"The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse." 

                        James Madison

by Danny Hammond

I just got an email from a reader who was asking me once again, to tell him the best way to prove that a foreclosing party was not a "party in interest".  I am working on turning in a federal lawsuit against a federal lawsuit next week.  I have answered this question a thousand times (gross exaggeration).  The answer is always the same.  A borrower never has the burden of proof.  It is the foreclosing party and the judge of the court that have that burden.  Borrowers don't try to find your Promissory Note, it is the foreclosing party that does not have that note.  Why would you help them?  Make the court run the case as was directed in Article III of the constitution. That answer can be found in multiple places in this blog.  But, I had a different answer to the problem.  Read it below.

Richard, I have been preaching the same thing for a year and a half.  The laws cannot vary from state to state. The vast majority of judges are not even aware of the laws that remove their immunity due to actions of their own.  

CONTINUE READING

Foreclosure Fraud: Mortgage Fraud Does Not Mean the Same Thing as Home Loan Fraud

"WHAT IF THE HANKY PANKY IS WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT?"   

                                                                    A bumper sticker

A mortgage (the same thing as a Deed of Trust) is no more than the rule book for the agreement between the lender and the Borrrer of what happens if a Borrower can or cannot pay back his loan.   The presence of fraud isn't the burden of the Borrower to prove in court. That is the constitutional duty of the judge.  The judges are betraying their oath to protect the constitution and the "public perception of the nation's courts" on a massive scale.

by Danny Hammond
mtgfrd.info@gmail.com

MORTGAGE:  Defined as-- "mortgage [a conditional conveyance of property as security for the repayment of a loan]"  Proper term is "Security Instrument"

FRAUD:  Defined as-- an intentional misrepresentation of material existing fact made by one person to another with knowledge of its falsity and for the purpose of inducing the other person to act, and upon which the other person relies with resulting injury or damage.

Foreclosing Parties have to prove with concrete and particularized evidence that they are acting legally at the beginning of a case they begin because they are wanting to take something away from someone is who is in possession of the thing.  In other words, the Foreclosing Party must prove that they are, in fact, not committing fraud.  The Borrower is being made to "prove" fraud, by judges is a violation of the constitution, a very grave and wrongful act for a judge.  

CONTINUE READING