CONTINUE READING
Sunday, July 16, 2023
What If Your Wrongful Foreclosure Was Already Void, But You Were Unaware Of This Fact?
CONTINUE READING
Wednesday, July 12, 2023
The Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements of Article III Standing As Defined By the The United States Supreme Court- From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: Foreclosure Fraud Primer 101 #4
The United States Constitution
by Danny Hammond mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
The judge promised when he took the job that he, or she, would enforce and protect the laws that come from the constitution and that they would defend the court ferociously from losing the public trust in the integrity of the court.
Maybe that was too much to ask from some pompous asses. Why did we all expect more of judges and attorneys anyway? If I am any part of the public, then I can tell you for sure, the courts have already lost some of MY public trust.
It is difficult for me to pull Borrowers back from their searches for Promissory Notes, and the Assignments of Mortgage, MERS, PSA, etc., etc., thinking like Dick Tracy and Perry Mason, as well as Captain Kirk looking for a way to "prove" that the party trying to foreclose on them does not have the authority, or, STANDING, to do so.
But, if what I say is true and the judges are letting the attorneys run amuck like the 2nd graders in my description, who can blame the attorneys for running amuck. "Amuck" is quickly becoming synonymous with the "actions of the courts" to me.
If you had seen judges simply ignore proof when it is presented as much as I have, then what I am now really trying to say is that this whole thing is only about Standing and nothing else. The initial burden of determining if the foreclosing party is a party with Standing is the review of the concrete and particularized evidence and the review of that evidence and the burden of proof is on the foreclosing party and the review of this "concrete and particularized" proof is the very foundation of law and it is the judge who must find Standing of the Foreclosing Party or refuse to take the case. The burden of investigating the "story" of the foreclosing is NOT ON THE BORROWER.
Thursday, June 15, 2023
Fraudulent Foreclosure and the Danny Hammond MIKE SINGLETARY Offense For Borrowers Facing Fraudulent Foreclosure
Vince Lombardi
by Danny Hammond
The theory behind my "Mike Singletary Mortgage Fraud Offense" begins with the premise that in your foreclosure court there are some nameless players who aren't really affecting the game as much as you think.
You are not going to win if Mike Singletary continues to play.
Thursday, May 11, 2023
The Undisputed King of Robo Signing Jeffrey Stephan's 1st Deposition As An Employee of GMAC Mortgage, LLC (or similarly named entities), Robo-Signing, 60 minutes, ROBO-SIGNING, 60 MINUTES, Tens of Millions of Stolen Homes, And No One In Govt or The Judiciary Saw a Thing.
Tuesday, May 9, 2023
MORTGAGE FRAUD: It Is A Straight Line! Your Entire Fraudulent Foreclosure Case Is Based On A Straight Line With No Gaps. But In Today's Corrupted System There Are Always Unexplainable Gaps.
Not because I am so smart, but because I have gotten overwhelmed and stuck.
CONTINUE READING
Monday, May 8, 2023
The Borrower Can Challenge The Assignments Of The Security Instruments Pursuant To The Rulings In "Slorp": The United States Court Of Appeals 6th Circuit
Just put you in the corner like an old banjo
The strings are breakin' but you can't say no
You're runnin' with the devil and it's touch and go
ALL OF THE FORECLOSING PARTIES HAVE BEEN USING THE WORN OUT INTERPRETATION OF LAW, SAYING "THE BORROWERS CANNOT CHALLENGE ANY ASSIGNMENTS OF THE MORTGAGE". BUT, MORTGAGE FRAUD CHANGES ALL OF THAT ACCORDING TO THE SIXTH CIRCUIT APPEALS COURT IN "SLORP"!
Republished by Danny Hammond
mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
|
The Imposter Foreclosing Party almost always claims that the Borrower (as the mortgagor) cannot challenge assignments. You did make your Promissory Note negotiable according to the terms of your Promissory Note that you allegedly signed. That is why the foreclosing parties use this interpretation.
But did the foreclosing party buy it legally? No almost assuredly it was never involved in a purchase and sale transaction which even involved any real purchase of your debt.
Friday, April 22, 2022
The Use of The Constitution Instead of Trying Over and Over To Find A Way To Convince A Judge He Does Not Now, Nor Did He Ever Understand What The Meaning Was In His Solemn Oath To Protect The Constitution And The Public's Confidence In the Courts As He Violates That Oath Over And Over In Fraudulent Foreclosure Cases
Wednesday, March 30, 2022
From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: LET'S ALL JUST TAKE THREE STEPS BACK FROM CRAZY! THAT IS RULE #1-- WHEN FIGHTING MORTGAGE FRAUD:
Crazy, I just cannot bear, That I'm living with something that just isn't fair
Mental wounds not healing.....Who and what's to blame
The Supreme Court settled the matter of assigning a mortgage or deed of trust in 1872. You can't assign those instruments. The case is CARPENTER V LONGAN AND THE CASE IS IN THIS ARTICLE JUST BELOW.
Find out why any assignment of the security agreement is void. Keep reading.
I have reviewed hundreds, possibly thousands of home loan paperwork preceding a fraudulent foreclosure. I have read about many more. I have never seen any deal where the foreclosing party was not relying on an assignment of the security instrument.
IN THE 26 STATES THAT USE NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE THE MORTGAGE IS CALLED A DEED OF TRUST. THE WORD MORTGAGE IS RARELY SPOKEN IN THESE STATES.
In Judicial foreclosure states, the assignment of the security instrument involves what is called a mortgage. A mortgage is not a home loan. It is merely the rule book concerning the collateral you put up to ensure that the bank will be paid back.
A mortgage has no value and the assignment of a mortgage does NOT transfer your home loan from one party to another. In the Non-Judicial States, the security instrument is called a Deed of Trust which serves the same purpose as a mortgage. There is no such thing as "the assignment of a mortgage or a deed of trust. The mortgage or deed of trust exists only as part of the loan agreement and it is incidental. The security instrument is known as the incidental instrument (there are no laws that require collateral for a loan at all.)
Your house is the usual collateral involving a home loan because that is where the loan money was spent. But, collateral could also consist of one thousand Schwinn bicycles in a warehouse. It is my strong personal belief that all (ALL) of the foreclosures in the United States from about the year 2000, or earlier, are based on the exact (EXACT) same lie. What is that lie?
CARPENTER V LONGAN (SUPREME COURT 1872) THE ENTIRE RULING IS NEXT
Tuesday, February 2, 2021
From The Mortgage Fraud "Pro Se" Series by Danny Hammond: I Am Going To Show You Why I Say, "If You Hire An Attorney You Will Lose"- Neil Garfield has gotta go!
I am not an attorney. Thank god. I am not a lawyer. I don't even know the difference. You must not construe what I say and write as the learned knowledge spewing from someone who only took 3 credit hours on real estate in law school and passed the bar. Although, I really do believe that I could pass the bar right now. But, warning!! I am not an attorney!! Another warning!!! Who would believe that an attorney who only took 3 credit hours of real estate law is capable of going up against the Gangsters that you have been dealing with? Do not take my advice as an attorney. I am not an attorney and that is good news for you. I am a real estate broker and a mortgage broker with 30 years of credits in real estate law and mortgage documents. I brokered the loan on my own house. CONTINUE READING
Wednesday, September 23, 2020
YOU WORKED HARD TO SAVE YOUR HOME FROM FORECLOSURE AND STILL LOST IT OR ARE LOSING IT. WERE YOU DOOMED BY MORTGAGE FRAUD BEFORE YOU EVEN STARTED?.... YEP. I RECKON SO.
BUT, USING YOUR RIGHTS IN THE CONSTITUTION, YOU CAN STILL GET IT BACK!
Fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten.-
G.K. Chesterton
After seven years of doing nothing else, but studying and researching mortgage fraud, I have finally figured out how to tell you how the whole deal worked.
I have had a dozen epiphanies along the way. Each time I believed that I had finally discovered the formula of winning cases that should have been winners.
But, in actuality, I had found something very important, but there was another layer just behind it. Like the way actors describe an onion and how you peel away one layer just to find another under it over and over.
Recently, I got my head around two rather significant issues. CONTINUE READING
GET A DETAILED REVIEW OF YOUR CASE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
ASK ABOUT STUDENT LOANS-CREDIT CARDS- AND ALL OTHER COLLECTION ISSUES
Thursday, August 20, 2020
Using Bank Deposits (depositors checking & savings accounts insured by taxpayers) JPMorgan Chase Lost $3.2 Billion Trading Stocks and Credit Derivatives in First Quarter: NEWS ON 07-13-2020 I HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT; WRITING ABOUT; MAKING VIDEOS ABOUT; THE FACT THERE ARE NO BANKING REGULATIONS IN THE US.... NOT SINCE 1999
I don't think that hardly any American citizens are aware that the Democrat president Bill Clinton and a Republican Congress repealed a 66-year-old banking and finance act known as the Glass Steagall Banking Act of 1933. This Act put together all of the research of the 1929 Wall Street Meltdown that sparked the great depression and wrote an act to prohibit ever happening again. The Act did its job. For 66 years there was no such event in the US. The Act was repealed in full as an act of Deregulation of the banking and finance industry. The president and the congress that repealed all relevant regulation of banking in 1999 put nothing back in its place. Seven short years later Wall Street imploded triggering the Wall Street Meltdown of 2007-2008-2009 through today. Frank Dodd was supposed to replace it, but both sides of congress had gutted it into a meaningless corpse by the time it was enacted.
There has been no meaningful regulation of finance since 1999, over twenty years. If there are no regulations there is no need for regulators. The only meaningful regulation coming out of Frank-Dodd was provided by the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau. Donald Trump sent his evil little henchman Mick Mulvaney to render it useless in 2017. It took him 3 days to send 100 million dollars in collected fines back to the banks that paid had voluntarily paid them.
Mick Mulvaney | |
Acting Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau | |
In-office November 25, 2017 – December 11, 2018 | |
President | Donald Trump |
Deputy | Leandra English Brian Johnson (acting) |
The CFPB has been around but has done nothing relevant since December of 2018. If you have been wondering why the CFPB does not answer your pleadings for help, it is because there is no one there to read them. This is what the word deregulation means in America in the 21st century.
The taxpayers propped up the "Too Big To Fail Banks" with 3 trillion dollars. The revived banks have been on a relentless crime spree ever since. Responsible for tens of millions of fraudulent foreclosures based on servicing lists and not Promissory Notes.
In the headline in the story below from Wall Street On Parade, the beginning of the headline says"Using Bank Deposits". By this, they mean JPMorgan Chase used the money from the depositors checking and savings accounts to fund "risky investments". Glass-Steagall does did not allow this. However, there is no prohibition from doing this in NO regulation. Nothing is prohibited. This has not been fixed for twenty years. Wake up depositors, JPMorgan Chase was using taxpayer insured (FDIC) checking and savings deposits to fund its risky investments. These particular risky investments were in fact so risky they failed to the tune of 3.2 Billion bucks. The taxpayers will just have to pay even more taxes to cover it. Jamie Dimon is no better than a modern-day Al Capone. CONTINUE READING
WOULD YOU LIKE A FREE ASSESSMENT
FILL OUT THE FORM CLICK THIS LINE
RELATED ARTICLES: by Danny Hammond
Thursday, August 6, 2020
THE NAMED LENDER ON YOUR HOME LOAN PROMISSORY NOTE AND SECURITY INSTRUMENT IS BOGUS! ALL OF THE NAMED LENDERS ON ALL OF THE HOME LOANS ARE BOGUS!
Major General John Bell Hood CSA
By Danny Hammond
Deutsche Bank, Deutsch Bank National Trust Company as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, US Bank N.A. as Trustee, Bank of New York "BONY" as
An easier list to look at is just below. I wanted this to look like the mess it is.
The best known of the crooks are two of the Deutsche trustees. Now, these companies don't belong to Deutsche Bank AWG from Berlin, Germany. They just claim the name to confuse idiot judges who are arrogant enough to believe that they know anything about real estate law.
CONTINUE READING
Do You Want To Ask About Affordable Answers For Stopping Your Foreclosure? Click This Line
Saturday, August 1, 2020
An Email Conversation That highlights The Problems Borrowers Are Having In Finding Real World Help In Stopping Wrongful Foreclosures And The Would Be Consultants Coaching Pro Se Who Are Suffering The Same Dilemma: We Are All Running Out Of Money And Personal Will To Go On
by Danny Hammond & Cindy (not her real name)
DLH: Oh come on Cindy, it cost me 10 years of my life, $300,000 in savings, my wife and family. I have lost over $9,000 a month in rental income, $500k in lost equity, and $100k in paying people for services that lost my home and wasted my time. I'm not going to do your deal for free. I have already told you what you are asking me now. If you didn't get it Cindy it's not because I'm smarter, I have just seen it way more times than you.
Cindy: I did not ask you to do my deal for free so I do not understand where you came up with that idea, however, you have left me with just a riddle.
I have lost way too much going down rabbit holes with little explanation and promises of being the only one who could save my home and yet everyone failed me. I need to fully understand what you are saying/proposing, if not it is worthless because I will not be able to follow through.
I need to understand how your plan gets past res judicata, I need to understand how you will get me past being officially labeled a vexatious litigant. I don't mind paying a reasonable amount for help because I know I cannot do this alone, but you have to understand how many people promised me so much and totally let me down.
DLH: I have told you more than you think. I wouldn't delete this thread, Cindy. Read it again.
Danny Hammond signing off. Peace out.
Cindy: You don’t know what I’ve been through. I have spent over $16,000 on attorneys since 2010. Each one left me off worse than when they started. I have been Pro Se for 5 years. I have no money left. But, I want to save my home. I need help now. Not a riddle to solve. CONTINUE READING
Thursday, July 30, 2020
MORTGAGE FRAUD-THE SACKING OF ROME IN 410 AD-THE GLASS STEAGALL ACT OF 1933 AND THE REASON FOR THE USE OF FIREWALLS
Reposted because I have always liked it and not enough people have read it.
by Danny Hammond |
KEEP READING I PROMISE THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT HOME LOAN FRAUD AND I'LL GET TO IT. CLICK HERE