Saturday, August 1, 2020

An Email Conversation That highlights The Problems Borrowers Are Having In Finding Real World Help In Stopping Wrongful Foreclosures And The Would Be Consultants Coaching Pro Se Who Are Suffering The Same Dilemma: We Are All Running Out Of Money And Personal Will To Go On

Return to Facebook


 by Danny Hammond & Cindy (not her real name)


DLH:  Oh come on Cindy, it cost me 10 years of my life, $300,000 in savings, my wife and family. I have lost over $9,000 a month in rental income, $500k in lost equity, and $100k in paying people for services that lost my home and wasted my time. I'm not going to do your deal for free. I have already told you what you are asking me now. If you didn't get it Cindy it's not because I'm smarter,  I have just seen it way more times than you.


Cindy:  I did not ask you to do my deal for free so I do not understand where you came up with that idea, however, you have left me with just a riddle. 


I have lost way too much going down rabbit holes with little explanation and promises of being the only one who could save my home and yet everyone failed me. I need to fully understand what you are saying/proposing, if not it is worthless because I will not be able to follow through.


I need to understand how your plan gets past res judicata, I need to understand how you will get me past being officially labeled a vexatious litigant. I don't mind paying a reasonable amount for help because I know I cannot do this alone, but you have to understand how many people promised me so much and totally let me down. 


DLH:  I have told you more than you think.  I wouldn't delete this thread, Cindy.  Read it again.


Danny Hammond signing off. Peace out.


Cindy:   You don’t know what I’ve been through.  I have spent over $16,000 on attorneys since 2010.  Each one left me off worse than when they started.  I have been Pro Se for 5 years.  I have no money left.  But, I want to save my home.  I need help now.  Not a riddle to solve. CONTINUE READING



Dlh: If you have come to this website for the reasons I think you have, I strongly recommend you read more




Friday, July 31, 2020

WHY FORECLOSURE FRAUD CASES CANNOT BE WON NORMALLY...LIKE MOST CONTRACT LAW CASES IT IS THE COURT'S INHERENT BIAS & IGNORANCE AND THE BETRAYAL OF THEIR OATH TO THE CONSTITUTION

"When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hang on." 
                                                                                        -Franklin D. Roosevelt



After nine years of fighting Promissory Note and Mortgage Fraud and never actually losing a case (nor ever quite winning outright in a normal way), I have figured out exactly why a case cannot be won by a borrower in any conventional way, yet winning should always have been a dunk shot if adjudicated correctly according to the constitution. I was dumbfounded. I have nearly stopped helping others, at least until  I prove convincingly that what I learned was right. Well, I am about to find out.


"CASES HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUDICATED CORRECTLY"?


By Danny Hammond


If you have tried to take your mortgage fraud case to court and you were absolutely convinced that you were a victim of fraud and you still want to fight your foreclosure, then you need foreclosure defenses to stop the judge from saying or demonstrating in any way his bias against borrowers or to completely dismiss all of the real facts in all cases.

 

I know how your civil rights work. What you believed so far is true and you were right. You just didn't have the proper info. You were fighting the wrong fight. If you have not taken your case to court yet, the above will happen when you do. I am using the simplest and most direct strategies to

 

overturn, or vacate, all foreclosures.  The founding fathers knew that one-day judges would do this.  they wrote the remedy into the constitution. 

 

It has been there waiting for this time since 1787.   CONTINUE READING

 

 

WOULD YOU LIKE A FREE ASSESSMENT

OF YOUR FORECLOSURE CASE? 

FILL OUT THE FORM CLICK THIS LINE



Thursday, July 30, 2020

The Securitization Debacle – A U.S. Pension Shortfall: $3.4 Trillion+ [$3,400,000,000,000] REPOSTED FROM 2019

“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.”
― Abraham Lincoln

by Danny Hammond

I have been writing about this subject extensively, especially the devastation brought on the American people by the Democrat President Bill Clinton and the Republican dominated Congress when in 1999 they repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933.  This Act which was the government's answer to what caused the Great Depression had kept the country's financial markets safe for nearly 70 years.  They Repealed the Act, but put no regulation in its place. Nine short years later the Great Wall Street Meltdown nearly broke the entire world's markets.  There is still no such regulation in place and foreclosures are still spiking and retirees are already seeing their retirement income cut.  Idiots.

Ms. Sullivan wrote this piece in 2016.  She was right on it then.  But, who do we complain to?  If we are to survive as a country, it is the people who must do the heavy lifting.   Danny Hammond


By Sydney Sullivan

looting the pension fundsPeople are wondering why unions are dwindling – it’s because of the securitization/rehypothecation scheme targeted unions to invest in their UNREGULATED DERIVATIVES,.  while Congress has done nothing to stop it. Union busting? Globalism? Agenda 21?

Shortfall. Unfunded. Underfunding.  It sounds like a minimal pension issue – however, it is anything but that. You may have heard the words “shortfall” when your state refers to its government budget or pension plan; and, if you are young (say, under 40), you’ve probably not given it a second thought. Just so you know “shortfall” is defined as “a failure to come up to expectation or need” and at 40 it seems like there will be plenty of time and ways to make up a shortfall… not so much when you are 60.

If you’re like many Americans, you’re worried about retirement. Maybe before the new century securitization scheme was launched, a “shortfall” might have been more easily explained and handled. But after 2000, the Wall Street securities system ramped up and took deficits to a new high while lining the pockets of Wall Street traders. How did this happen?
How did the USA get to over $3.4 TRILLION in unfunded pension debt? The answer is not something your Congressional or state legislators want to discuss in public …or even in confidence. What caused “shortfalls”? To understand how a state could get so severely “underfunded” with their pension funds, you must first understand that this hqdefault (1)didn’t just happen overnight. De-regulation and rule changing have been going on since the last Great Depression, though the final wallop occurred when Congress repealed Glass-Steagall in 1999. “Glass-Steagall was designed to prevent exactly the kind of collaboration that brought us the Goldman-Sachs fraud.” Source: Daily Kos.
Now, a lot of people blame a Republican Congress under the Clinton administration for the demise of Glass-Steagall – however, that is not altogether true. The House Democrats were instrumental in passing the repeal – even Nancy Pelosi (whose husband worked for Countrywide) voted “yea”. A sad fact, but true. We all make mistakes as both the parties agreed it was best to reinstate Glass-Steagall – at least as far as their party platforms go.

Check the record … how did your own Senators and Congresspersons vote?  

Friday, July 24, 2020

A CHAT CONCERNING THE SAME ISSUES BETWEEN VERY INFORMED PEOPLE ABOUT STANDING AND SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom. 
                                                                                                           Jon Stewart

AXJ- You are on the right track...but read some Roman Law...in dubio pro reo...contractus legem...Because we always look at Subject Matter Jurisdiction first and then Standing.

Danny Hammond- Jurisdiction can not exist without a Plaintiff with Standing. Until the moment that Standing is reviewed and validated Subject Matter can not be attacked because it does not exist until Standing exists. I don't understand how you claim you are challenging Subject Matter Jurisdiction before you attack Standing. The only function a judge really has to perform at the very beginning of a case is to make sure he has a genuine dispute between two or more parties with proven adverse interests in an issue. If the judge finds that the Plaintiff has no standing, then Subject Matter Jurisdiction cannot exist and can not and need not be addressed. So, I would be interested in your description of challenging Subject Matter Jurisdiction before Standing.

Danny Hammond- Can we use pig Latin? I am better versed in it.

Thursday, July 16, 2020

ARE YOU READY TO SUE YOUR JUDGE AND STOP LOOKING FOR ALTERNATIVES? DOES YOUR FORECLOSURE CASE SEEM TO DEFY LOGIC? FREE ZOOM CLASS

"A settled plan to deprive the people of the benefits, blessings, and ends of the contract, to subvert the fundamentals of the constitution, to deprive them of all share in making and executing laws, will justify a revolution.'''  

                                        John  Adams, Novanglus Papers, 1774




We are facing the destruction of our constitution.  It will require a revolution to put things back as they were.  I don't mean a violent revolution.  I mean an effective one.  It isn't just a good idea to save your house from foreclosure.  The suing of judges who don't believe that Article III applies to them is a civic duty


Danny Hammond's Zoom Meetings

COMING SOON



by Danny Hammond

I have never believed that I would be able to make a template for a WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE CASE based on DEPRIVATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS.
But, I was wrong. I have created a cookie-cutter lawsuit that is short, sweet, and targets the only person in yours or any court who allowed all of the crime, deception, and property theft.
You know who it is, your judge. The criminal attorneys and fake foreclosing parties could never have pulled off any foreclosures without JUDGES depriving Borrowers of multiple civil rights by not doing the job that we are paying them to do.
There are only 3 reasons a judge could force you to lose to racketeering enterprises that steal homes thousands of times never getting caught while Borrowers are stuck researching and flailing away at saving their doomed homes.
The 3 reasons a judge would allow it in his or her court?
1. Your judge is stupid and barely passed the bar 20 years ago and never studied law since.
2. Your judge is wildly misinformed. He thinks that no borrower should get a home for free in his court. So, he is going to give your house to a foreclosing party who has no right to collect money for free.
3. Your judge is a crook.
I have thought about it. Your frustration is that you know that the foreclosing party is breaking the law in a United States court. So you are targeting the wrong parties. You are trying to expose SPS, Green Tree, Ocwen etc., and their attorneys as criminal fraudsters. But, how can they commit these crimes so blatantly?
It isn't all of the parties that you have to beat. It is only the person controlling your whole case. It is only this one official that can ignore evidence and case law.
It isn't an attorney, a servicer, a Fictitious Payee claiming he has the right to foreclose.
IT IS YOUR JUDGE! Why are you leaving the judge alone?
The Judge controls your fate by controlling the fate of your house and he is allowing the attorneys to run amuck.
I am looking for 1-3 Borrowers who really want to save their home and who will agree that what I am saying is the only way to get the damn judge out of the way.
Tomorrow I am going to begin the final work on my three cases. I have one Borrower who is all in and I am beginning to outline his case. But, I am doing this full-time now. I don't have an income so I am inviting committed Borrowers to fight back using the only real laws left in place. Constitutional civil rights.
I will add Borrowers so that we can start multiple ruckuses in multiple locations.
I will need one Borrower at $900 per month for two months to follow this all the way through.

That is all I feel comfortable with. It isn't enough money, but I am not an attorney and if I win my three cases I will get my retirement and my life back. So, I will get myself and the first Borrower done and follow through with whatever comes next.
I will take on three more cases that fit my model. I will not talk about wrongful foreclosure or teach "Chain of Title" or Mortgage Fraud any longer. I am going to sue some judges using the laws that are meant to keep judges from running amuck and harming citizens. The judge is a citizen nothing more.
I am going to hold a Zoom class tomorrow at 4 pm to answer questions and debate my sanity. I am very rarely wrong on this subject. 
There will be no charge to attend and ask me questions. Vet me. Punch a hole in what I say. If I am wrong that would be easy to uncover. 
I will only consider going further with Borrowers who attend this class. If no one attends, then I will just take on the cases I have. There will be no more offers. 
This is going to be tough and I am going to have to concentrate on behalf of whoever joins in.


VIDEO: STOPPING FORECLOSURE: TO SAVE YOUR HOUSE, YOU MUST PUSH YOUR JUDGE OUT OF THE WAY!

     

Thursday, July 2, 2020

A Simple Question. I Hope I Provided a Simple Answer. I Think I Wrote a Post: WHEN I SAY YOU SHOULD SUE YOUR WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE CASE JUDGE, THAT IS FOR SIMPLIFICATION; YOU WILL ACTUALLY SUE A CITIZEN WHO IS A JUDGE WHENEVER HE IS NOT DEPRIVING OTHER CITIZENS OF THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS JOB IS

"Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat."  -Tzun Tzu 4000 BC give or take



AXJ NEW YORK: Danny Hammond we at Actions for Justice ( AXJ ) go as far as stating that housing is a human right and in the case of homeowners would prevail over any repayment of a debt. Your opinion?

 · Reply · 21h

Danny Hammond  Well, it is a step too far without clarification. It is bad enough to have to consider a suing a judge, which is how I say it for simplification, you actually are suing a citizen who is a judge whenever he is not depriving citizens of constitutional "civil" rights.


But, when he moves a case forward without reviewing the pleadings of the foreclosing party for the claim of injury and the "concrete and particularized" evidence at the very BEGINNING of a contract law case, he and his court (one and the same) do not have the absolutely required "Subject Matter Jurisdiction". The court has no choice but to dismiss the case, or in non-judicial states vacate and set aside the illegal non-judicial foreclosure.

To move the case forward is to commit the most heinous of crimes possible.  Deprivation of Civil Rights, under color of law. This cannot be done and everything that happens after this is void ab initio. "Void at the beginning". Never not "void". 

A judge can be proven to have taken a bribe and when his ruling injures you, he still maintains his immunity from a party to sue him for damages. The difference is that the bribed judge may be in a "judicial setting" and therefore is still a judge. Continue Reading

Monday, June 29, 2020

VIDEO: HOW WILL THE CONSTITUTION HELP ME SAVE MY HOME FROM FORECLOSURE IN MY COURT CASE? WILL YOUR CLASSES REALLY HELP ME FIGHT MORTGAGE FRAUD??

“You’re in pretty good shape for the shape you are in. 
I have heard there are troubles of more than one kind. 
Some come from ahead and some come from behind
But I’ve brought a big bat. I’m all ready you see. 
Now my troubles are going to have troubles with me!” 

– Dr. Seuss


by Danny Hammond

In 2012 everyone including me thought that we just had to have an attorney to fight mortgage fraud in our wrongful foreclosure cases. After spending thousands of dollars and having the attorneys botch the majority of all cases and experiencing judges who did not read what we wrote I came to a dire conclusion.

We were, in my opinion, doomed.

That is not true today.  Today I believe if you hire an attorney you will lose. But you can represent yourself (Pro Se) if you are well-coached and you understand these issues. 

Today, I also believe if you keep trying to find the silver bullet to turn your judge around, you will lose.

But the Framers of the United States Constitution knew this time would come. They feared that judges would accumulate too much power and become little dictators of the fiefdom of their jurisdictions. 

They embedded the remedy into the constitution.  CONTINUE READING

VIDEO BELOW

Tuesday, June 23, 2020

Mortgage Fraud: From The Danny Hammond Pro Se Primer 101- You Need To Forget The Past! Yes, Your Government and Your Courts Have Screwed You Big Time. So What? That's Only What Happened Just Up To Now.

It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood;”
― Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers


I started a Facebook Group.  People joined it and I don’t know what I am supposed to do
except to try and guide the members to the only solutions for Foreclosure Fraud I can find.
Use the power of the United States Constitution.


In my group forum, I noticed that most people aren’t trying to go forward and save their

homes.  They are mostly poking fingers at people and institutions that they think F****d

them over.  They are right.


They are right in everything they are saying.  But today foreclosure is not about law.  It is

about Outlaws.


This is a very serious and dangerous problem.  It is going to determine the future of the
United States. We have a civic duty to sue a judge.  Embrace it. Do not fear it.


You can’t just point fingers.  You have to figure out who is really responsible for hurting you
and deliver some hurt right back at them.
CONTINUE READING:


CLICK HERE TO TELL US WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE INCLUDED IN "REAL ESTATE LAW"
& "FORECLOSURE FRAUD ZOOM CLASSES"

by Danny Hammond
Would You Like To Get Answers On Your Particular Situation?


Saturday, June 20, 2020

From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: EVERY TIME I THOUGHT I HAD FIGURED OUT WHO WAS BLOCKING BORROWERS THREATENED WITH WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE FROM WINNING MORTGAGE FRAUD LAWSUITS-I WOULD FIND ANOTHER FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM

NOW I AM ABSOLUTELY STUNNED TO FIGURE OUT THAT MOST (yes, it is most) OF OUR AMERICAN COURTS ARE A BIG, BIG PART OF THE SO-CALLED "MORTGAGE" PROBLEM.  
(IT'S THE JUDGES STUPID!)


"HERE COME 'DA  JUDGE!"

"You know what's wrong with karate Jerry? It's based on the ridiculous assumption that the other guy will fight fair."   
            

Jim Rockford (the lead character on the Rockford Files)

by Danny Hammond
All of the Borrowers who come to me for advice on how to handle their mortgage foreclosure problems portray one distinct trait in common.  None of them understand the problem. They don't know why it seems so complicated. They know that there is something wrong with the system, but are completely unable to see what it is.  Why?

Because all of their lives they were led to believe that while some corruption did exist in America, you could still depend on the law and the financial system to treat you fairly because of the law and the trustworthiness (if that isn't a word, we will use it anyway) of generally our country.  We all have believed that America was the greatest country in the world.  That we were the good guys and that Americans, in the end, will do the right thing.  Not True.   

CONTINUE READING    


CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO                                                                        

Tuesday, June 16, 2020

I CAN'T AFFORD AN ATTORNEY TO HELP ME DEFEND MY HOME FROM MORTGAGE FRAUD BY STOPPING FORECLOSURE

Whenever we're afraid, it's because we don't know enough. If we understood enough, we would never be afraid. 

                                                                                                                                        Earl Nightingale


AM I SUPPOSED TO JUST STEP ASIDE 
AND LET A FAKE  LENDER TAKE MY HOUSE?


by Danny Hammond
There are 12 of us working loosely as a group and making our way through court each representing ourselves.  Is it wrong? Are we going to lose?  I have felt both confident and anxious over the last three years.  But, we have won four cases very recently, so the answer is that, yes it is possible.

I have been sitting in court and heard every judge admonish each of the members of my group that they "need to get an attorney"
. It is, on a general level, good advice.  But, these judges are missing some details that reduce that advice down to not really advice so much as an ignorant lack of reality.

Monday, June 15, 2020

MORTGAGE FRAUD: THERE IS NO MAGIC BULLET, TRICKY ANGLE, NOR AN "AHA!" MOMENT. THE REMEDY WAS EMBEDDED IN THE CONSTITUTION BY THE BRILLIANT ANCIENTS

"The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse." 
                        James Madison

by Danny Hammond


I just got an email from a reader who was asking me once again, to tell him the best way to prove that a foreclosing party was not a "party in interest".  I am working on turning in a federal lawsuit against a federal lawsuit next week.  I have answered this question a thousand times (gross exaggeration).  The answer is always the same.  A borrower never has the burden of proof.  It is the foreclosing party and the judge of the court that have that burden.  Borrowers don't try to find your Promissory Note, it is the foreclosing party that does not have that note.  Why would you help them?  Make the court run the case as was directed in Article III of the constitution. That answer can be found in multiple places in this blog.  But, I had a different answer to the problem.  Read it below.

Richard, I have been preaching the same thing for a year and a half.  The laws cannot vary from state to state. The vast majority of judges are not even aware of the laws that remove their immunity due to actions of their own.  

Tuesday, May 19, 2020

THE FORECLOSURE SOLUTIONS GROUP & Danny Hammond ARE LOOKING FOR BORROWERS WHO WOULD BE INTERESTED IN A ZOOM SEMINAR ON "WHY YOU CANNOT WIN YOUR FORECLOSURE BATTLE WITHOUT USING YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL CIVIL RIGHTS IN COURT"


ZOOM SEMINAR: 
 CONSTITUTIONAL CIVIL RIGHTS IN FORECLOSURE COURT CASES

DO YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT A ZOOM SEMINAR WITH THE FORECLOSURE SOLUTIONS GROUP & Danny Hammond concerning:
YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL CIVIL RIGHTS RIGHTS AS A BORROWER

and Why Judges Are Not Using Them To Protect All Of Us From The Twenty-Year Onslaught Of Mortgage & Foreclosure Fraud AS THE OATH THE EACH TOOK TO PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION AND THE PEOPLES PERCEPTION OF THE INTEGRITY OF THE COURTS?
Please consider attending. This will work better if many were attacking at one time.
Danny Hammond
We have three questions that we need your help with?  We have already started a Zoom account and we are trying to figure out what to charge for a series of this type of Seminar.  Obviously, the more attendees that we have, the less we have to charge each attendee.  So, if you are interested you should tell others to fill out a form or contact us.  The information will be on our website at:


So, do you want to know why you are getting nowhere with your foreclosure court case?  Danny Hammond says that it is because judges in America are universally depriving your civil right to due process and a fair trial.  The judge is guilty of taking the case forward without subject matter jurisdiction because he did not review the evidence put forward by the foreclosing party at the very beginning of pleadings.  

Therefore, the court has no party which has met the Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements of Standing.  The judge has committed an act of "Deprivation of Constitutional Civil Rights".  This is the only way the judge can cause himself to lose his immunity from the parties in a case from suing him as a citizen.

That is what the judge is in this situation.

Why won't your attorneys help you with this pleading?  They are scared of the judge and his perceived power.  Informed Pro Se need not fear a judge.  We will not play golf with the judge next week, nor will we bring another case before him soon.

There is no one to help us but each other.

The three questions?

1. How much is too much to pay for this information in an organized presentation?

2. Would you attend this cyber presentation from your home or work if there were no special accessories to install or use?  You would just use your computer.

3.  What would you pay to attend?

Monday, April 27, 2020

YOU HAVE BEEN WRONGFULLY FORECLOSED. YOU KNOW WHICH BANKS WERE THE ORIGINAL BAD GUYS. I HAVE A QUESTION. WHERE DO YOU KEEP YOUR CHECKING A SAVINGS ACCOUNT?

"We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." 
                                                                     Supreme Court Chief Justice Louis Dembitz Brandeis
                                                                         (November 13, 1856 – October 5, 1941)


By Danny Hammond
On at least a dozen occasions over that last decade, especially before the known "Too Big to Fail" jumped out of the spotlights, I have been working with clients who had been "used, abused and tattooed" by, let's say Bank of America. I had done some work and sent the clients a bill. Every now and then I would receive a check in payment. I am telling the truth, but it's going to sound like a lie, I would look a the check and it would be from someone like Wells Fargo. Huh?

I just can't believe it.  Are some of you today guilty of this?  Whether they were standing right in front of me or I received the check by mail I would just have to ask, "why do you have your money deposited in a criminal bank that you know is foreclosing on you, as well as foreclosing on millions of other families?   Wells Fargo (or another name that the reader knows well) is the same exact racketeering organization as Bank of America (again, insert name).  There is no company in your life that has done you more harm than one of these banks.  Can you explain to me why you are keeping your money in this bank?  Please, I need to know.  I'm the guy helping you.

The answers were all kind of similar.  Well, Danny, you know they have offices everywhere.  They are just so convenient.

You know that was just an example.  It isn't just two of the biggest names.  There are so many, many more.  But, I used Wells Fargo as an example because they were probably the most abusive and nasty Imposter foreclosing Party and Fictitious Payee of the whole pile.  But, also as they began to be forced to pay fines for felonies for which they were not made to admit guilt that they had to slow down their foreclosure pace.  This caused a new problem, they had become so addicted as an organization to giant piles of easy money that when the time came they saw nothing wrong with opening small accounts averaging 4 per customer and totaling $400 per month in fees from 2 million richer customers.  Customers that wouldn't notice $400 disappearing in smaller chunks from multiple accounts.  $400 X 2 million customers = $800 million dollars...per month.  Unearned, Unjust Enrichment, theft, white-collar crime but you get the idea.

They apologized and promised that heads would roll.  They did.  They fired 6,000 lower-level employees who could not have planned such a scheme or engaged in it, they fired the innocent low level.  Although they may have known that they had been ordered to facilitate it, they had no choice.  They owned a home, cars, kids, kids going to college too.

Don't believe that US Bank N.A., Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, PNC Bank, and the biggest advertiser that I have seen on TV wanting your deposits, Wells Fargo, weren't the ones that foreclosed on you and stole your home.  They all used surrogates to do the dirty work openly at first.  But, after absorbing billions of dollars in fines that everyone assumed they could afford as a cost of doing (dirty) business they took their names underground and left the work to the surrogates.  Now, they advertise giving money to Charities and noble causes and want you to believe that they love you so much that they will help you care for your money.  Can anyone explain why?  There are plenty of regional and community banks that can give you all of the same services.  There are Credit Unions that will welcome you using your name.  Why would you extend your hand to help the "banks too big to trust?  

This is one of the biggest problems in America.  People do not understand that there is no one watching out for them.  Not their government, not their courts, not their attorneys.  Americans need to watch out for themselves.  The laws that they assume are there to protect them began to be repealed at an accelerating rate starting with the repeal of Glass-Steagall in 1999.  Google that my friends. Or read my 3 part articles on the subject.  I have already researched de-regulation saving you one step in saving your constitution and, in fact, your country.  Do you want to gain some idea of what your Congressmen and Congresswomen are up to? Click on these articles:



The Term "Void" Is Often Used In Contrast To "Voidable" And "Unenforceable". The Main Difference Is That An Action That Is Voidable Remains Valid Until It Is Avoided.

by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 court press. Can Anyone truly believe that it is the Borrowers that come up with these bizarre scenarios?  My si...