Not because I am so smart, but because I have gotten overwhelmed and stuck.
CONTINUE READING
Republished by Danny Hammond
mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
|
These words below do not come from current events. They aren't the only quotes from famous writer. They all have something to do with my thinking, as I have tried to do the right thing for all Borrowers who were cheated from obtaining the American Dream. “Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.” “Waste no more time arguing about what a good man should be. Be one.” “Understand at last that you have something in you more powerful and divine than what causes the bodily passions, and pulls you like a mere puppet. What thoughts now occupy my mind? Is it not fear, suspicion, desire, or something like that?” "The art of living is more like wrestling than dancing, because an artful life requires being prepared to meet and withstand sudden and unexpected attacks.” “You shouldn’t give circumstances the power to rouse anger, for they don’t care at all.” Anger is not thought. Anger is anti-thought. Marcus Aurelius Antoninus was Roman emperor from 161 to 180 AD and a Stoic philosopher. He was the last of the rulers known, non-contemporaneously, as the Five Good Emperors and the last emperor of the Pax Romana, an age of relative peace, calmness and stability for the Roman Empire lasting from 27 BC to 180 AD |
"I have complete faith in the continued absurdity of whatever's going on."
A Very Comprehensive REVIEW of Article III Standing.
State Judges are not bound by this. They think that is the end of the matter. However, if your state judge has ruled against you and Granted for the party that could not pass the federal requirements of Standing against you. You can file for appeal to Federal Court. In almost every other instance if your case has been ruled on by a state court, a federal court cannot take your case.
After a miserable 10 years fighting ignorant judges, everything I write is based on your constitutional civil rights. That is the only law left for us. Stop believing that there is a magic statute.
The judge is not going to read what you file. The laws are fine. The laws are good. They have not been changed.
But you tell me, is a law a law, if it is not enforced?
“Court business is a hell of a problem. It’s a good deal like politics. It asks for the highest type of men and women, and there’s nothing in it to attract the highest type of men and women. So we have to work with what we get...”
Paraphrasing of ― Raymond Chandler, The Lady in the Lake
by Danny Hammond |
“I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power.”
IF YOU ONLY RETAIN THREE WORDS FROM THIS POST YOU WILL NOT HAVE WASTED YOUR TIME.
THE WORDS ARE: "INJURY IN FACT"
Article III of the Constitution of the United States as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court has long ago established a constitutional, irreducible, minimum set of requirements for a party in a genuine dispute to establish that it has the Standing to redress a claimed "Injury In Fact" before it can bring a dispute before any court.
Without the existence of Standing all courts in the land must acknowledge that the court has no subject matter jurisdiction to hear any merits of a case and that it has no choice whatsoever but to dismiss the subject action.
In Borrower's cases, this subject action is the claim that the foreclosing party is the party in interest that has the "right" to foreclose on a Borrower's property and that it is claiming and proving that it has been injured by the Borrower enabling its right to foreclose.
The three requirements to prove Standing in a case involving Judicial Foreclosure state foreclosure actions in which the foreclosing party is the Plaintiff and the Borrower is the defendant.
To Comment or email: mtgfrd.info@gmail.com
Republished by Danny Hammond. This and other posts will be placed not chronologically, but by relevance. They are in the order that I wish I would have learned the information. DLH
I have not edited any of the words of this letter, however, I did add spacing since the writer (perhaps a bad student) wrote this harsh observation as a single paragraph and it was a little hard to read. DLH
THE LETTER:
At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were
supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government.
Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most
dangerous;
that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a
freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to
concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at
large;
that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping, by
little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and working its change
by construction, before anyone has perceived that that invisible and helpless
worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance.
In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all
liability to account.